Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2006.19.5.407

Modification of conventional X-ray diffractometer for the measurement of phase distribution in a narrow region  

Park, Yang-Soon (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Han, Sun-Ho (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Kim, Jong-Goo (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Jee, Kwang-Yong (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Kim, Won-Ho (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Publication Information
Analytical Science and Technology / v.19, no.5, 2006 , pp. 407-414 More about this Journal
Abstract
An X-ray diffractometer for spatially resolved X-ray diffraction measurements was developed to identify phase in the narrow (micron-scaled) region of high burn-up fuels and some nuclear materials. The micro-XRD was composed of an X-ray microbeam alignment system and a sample micro translation system instead of a normal slit and a fixed sample stage in a commercial XRD. The X-ray microbeam alignment system was fabricated with a microbeam concentrator having two Ni deposited mirrors, a vertical positioner, and a tilt table for the generation of a concentrated microbeam. The sample micro translation system was made with a sample holder and a horizontal translator, allowing movement of a specimen at $5{\mu}m$ steps. The angular intensity profile of the microbeam generated through a concentrator was symmetric and not distorted. The size of the microbeam was $4,000{\times}20{\mu}m$ and the spatial resolution of the beam was $47{\mu}m$ at the sample position. When the diffraction peaks were measured for a $UO_2$ pellet specimen by this system, the reproducibility ($2{\Theta}={\pm}0.01^{\circ}$) of the peaks was as good as a conventional X-ray diffractometer. For the cross section of oxidized titanium metal, not only $TiO_2$ in an outer layer but also TiO near an oxide-metal interface was observed.
Keywords
micro X-ray diffraction; microbeam concentrator; narrow region; interface;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 D. H. Bilderback and D. J. Thiel, Review of Scientific Instruments, 66, 2059-2063 (1995)   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Y. Suzuki and F. Uchida, Review of Scientific Instruments, 63, 578-581 (1992)   DOI
3 A. Takeuchi, Y. Suzuki, K. Uesugi, and S. Aoki, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 467- 468, 302-304 (2001)   DOI
4 S. Hayakawa, A. Iida, S. Aoki, and Y. Gohshi, Review of Scientific Instruments, 60, 2452-2455 (1989)   DOI
5 H. N. Chapman, K. A. Nugent, and S. W. Wilkins, Applied Optics, 32, 6316-6332 (1993)   DOI
6 P. Dhez, P. Chevallier, T. B. Lucatorto, and C. Tarrio, Review of Scientific Instruments, 70, 1907-1920 (1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
7 A. Snigirev, Review of Scientific Instruments, 66, 2053- 2058 (1995)   DOI   ScienceOn
8 A. Snigirev, V. Kohn, I. Snigireva, and B. Lengeler, Nature, 364, 49-51 (1996)
9 Y. S. Park, Y. K. Ha, S. D. Park, S. H. Han, and W. H. Kim, 'X-ray microbeam generation with optical mirrors and lens', KAERI/AR-706/2004, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2004
10 C. David and A. Souvorov, Review of Scientific Instruments, 70, 4168-4173 (1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
11 H. N. Chapman, A. Rode, K. A. Nugent, and S. W. Wilkins, Applied Optics, 32, 6333-6340 (1993)   DOI
12 J. Spino and D. Papaioannou, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 281, 146-162 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
13 D. Papaioannou and J. Spino, Review of Scientific Instruments, 73, 2659-2665 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
14 M. R. Howells, D. Cambie, R.M. Duarte, S. Irick, A.A. MacDowell, Opt. Eng. 39, 2748-2762 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn