Browse > Article

Program Theory Evaluation of a Lifestyle Intervention Program for the Prevention and Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome  

Yoo, Seung-Hyun (Seoul National University Graduate School of Public Health/ Seoul National University Center for Health Promotion Research)
Kim, Hye-Kyeong (Health Promotion Research Institute, Korea Association of Health Promotion)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion / v.27, no.4, 2010 , pp. 165-175 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the program theory of a lifestyle intervention program for the prevention and treatment of metabolic syndrome. Methods: The program evaluated is a tailored intervention for multiple health behavior associated with metabolic syndrome which is informed by theoretical constructs from the Intervention Mapping and Transtheoretical model. The program components include one-to-one health counseling, a self-management handbook, and a health diary. To evaluate program impact theory we examined the logic of program goals and objectives, intervention methods and strategies, and the theoretical constructs of program materials through document review and matrix building. Results: This evaluation has found that the intervention program applied social cognitive theory constructs to design intervention methods and strategies in addition to the Transtheoretical model: self-monitoring for goal setting and monitoring skill, outcome expectation for the benefits of health behavior change, and interaction with environment for observational learning through modeling. While the intervention addresses multiple determinants and behaviors, it is limited to an individual level and lacks social and environmental approaches. Following the Transtheoretical framework, the contents of the intervention materials were developed utilizing consciousness raising as a main strategy for earlier stages of change, and counterconditioning and stimulus control for later stages of change. Conclusion: Program theory evaluation can be a process of enhancing program validity. It would also be necessary for providing basis for efficient program implementation. When comparisons of program theory between similar programs are possible, program theory and validity will be strengthened when comparisons of program theories between similar programs are possible.
Keywords
Program theory; Evaluation; Metabolic syndrome; Lifestyle intervention program; Intervention Mapping; Transtheoretical Model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 유승현, 김혜경. 건강증진 기획모형의 중재기획 단계 비교:PRECEDE-PROCEED와 Intervention Mapping. 보건교육 건강증진학회지 2010; 27(2): 141-149.   과학기술학회마을
2 Saito I, Murata K, Hirose H, Tsujioka M, Kawabe H. Relation between blood pressure control, body mass index, and intensity of medical treatment. Hypertension Research, 2003:26:711-715.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Blair SN. Changes in physical fitness and all cause mortality: A prospective study of healty and unhealthy men. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1995;273:1093-1098.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Meigs JB. Invited commentary: Insulin resistance syndrome? Syndrome X? Multiple metabolic syndrome? A syndrome at all? Factor analysis reveals patterns in the fabric of correlated metabolic risk factors. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2000;152:908-911.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Riccardi G, Rivellese A. Dietary treatment of the metabolic syndrome: The optimal diet. British Journal of Nutrition, 2000;83:S143-S148.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Sattar N, Gaw A, Scherbakova O, et al. Metabolic syndrome with and without C-reactive protein as a predictor of coronary heart disease and diabetes in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Circulation, 2003;108:414–419.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Uzu T, Kimura G, Yamaguchi A, Kanasaki M, Isshiki K, Araki S. et al. Enhanced sodium sensitivity and disturbed circadian rhythm of blood pressure in essential hypertension. Journal of Hypertension, 2006;24:1627-1632.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult treatment panel III). Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program(NCEP). Journal of the American Medical Association, 2001;285:2486-2497.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Meigs JB. Epidemiology of the metabolic syndrome. American Journal of Managed Care, 2002;8(11 Suppl):S282-S292.
10 Ohta Y, Tsuchihashi T, Ueno M, Kajioka T, Onaka U, Tominaga M. et al. relationp between the awareness of salt restriction and the actual salt intake in hypertensive patients. Hypertension Research, 2004;27:243-246.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: A systematic approach, 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004.
12 중앙일보. 한국대사증후군포럼 발족. 중앙일보 2010년 10월 25 일자.
13 김병성. 한국인에서의 대사증후군의 유병률. 대한임상건강증진학회지, 2001;2(1):17-25.
14 서울시 대사증후군 관리사업 지원단. 서울시와 5樂하자!http://www.5check.or.kr. 2009.
15 이은희, 김혜경, 이윤희, 문순영, 권은주, 지선하. 생활습관 중재프로그램이 성인의 건강생활습관실천과 대사증후군개선에 미치는 효과 분석. 보건교육건강증진학회지,2007;24(3):1-19.   과학기술학회마을
16 최영근, 오한진, 주일우. 한국 폐경 여성에서 생물학적 스트레스 지표와 대사증후군의 요소. 대한임상건강증진학회지 2009; 9(1): 50-55.
17 American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation, 2006;114:82-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Planning health promotion programs: Intervention Mapping, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2006.