Browse > Article

Evaluation of Health Promoting School by School Characteristics  

Lee, Eun-Young (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Choi, Bo-Youl (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Sohn, Ae-Ree (Division of Health Management, Sahmyook University)
Ahn, Dong-Hyun (Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess input for health promoting schools (HPS), and to evaluate HPS based on WHO's guidelines through school characteristics, and to identify the schools' need among six areas of HPS. Methods: A stratified and random cluster sampling design was used to obtain a cross-sectional sample. A total of 59 elementary, middle and high schools in Seoul and Gyeonggi areas were included, and 333 teachers (males 40.6%, females 59.4%) participated in this survey. A self-reported questionnaire consisted of ten items for input for HPS, 50 items for the evaluation of HPS and three items for the schools' needs among six areas of HPS. Data was analyzed through a t-test, ANOVA, and a Duncan test. Results: The mean score of input for HPS was 48.5 ($\pm$15.3). Elementary schools had higher mean scores of input than middle schools. The mean score of schools with a management committee was higher than those schools without it. The schools which had meetings on health issues had higher mean scores. The mean score for HPS was 76.8 ($\pm$9.4): the area of "School Physical Environment" had the highest score (80.0$\pm$10.9), and the area of "Community Relationships" had the lowest score (67.1$\pm$13.9). Elementary schools had higher mean scores of HPS than middle and high schools. The schools which had less than nine classes and more than 31 classes had higher mean scores. The mean scores of schools with less than 340 students and more than 1201 students had higher. The schools which had meetings on health issues had higher mean scores. The same results were found on six areas of HPS. The teachers responded that the areas of "School Health Policy", "The School Physical Environment", and "Health Service" should be supported among the six areas of HPS. Conclusion: Based on these results, more concerns and support for school health are necessary. Middle schools should give more regard on the development of HPS. For comprehensive school health promotion, all six areas of HPS should be equally supported.
Keywords
Health Promoting School; Evaluation; Needs; School Characteristics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김영임. 학교건강증진 지표개발 및 측정에 관한 연구. 한국학교보건학회지 1998;11(2):189-201
2 장창곡. 건강한 학교 만들기 모형 개발. 한국학교보건학회지 2001;14(1):39-46
3 Leger LS. What's the place of schools in promoting health? Are we too optimistic? Health Promotion International 2004;19(4):405-408   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 WHO. School health promotion-Series 5: Regional guidelines: Development of health promoting schools: A framework for action. Manila: WHO, 1996
5 박혜숙, 이훈재, 김은미, 공경애 등. 학교 건강증진사업 평가 및 지원체계 개발. 이화여자대학교. 건강증진사업단, 2006
6 WHO. Local action: Creating health promoting school. WHO's inforamtion series on school health, WHO, UNESCO, EDC, 2000
7 김혜련. 아동, 청소년 건강증진사업의 과제와 발전방향: 영양, 신체활동 증진 및 비만예방을 중심으로. 보건복지포럼 2008;141:20-21
8 보건복지가족부. 청소년 건강행태 온라인 조사: 제4차 조사 중간 결과 발표 및 청소년 건강정책 포럼. 서울: 질병관리본부, 보건복지가족부, 2008
9 Stewart-Brown S. What is the evidence on school health promotion in improving health or preventing disease and specifically, what is the effectiveness of the health promoting schools approach? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2006
10 Gray GI, Young I, Barneko V. Developing a health-promoting school, International Planning Committee of the European Network of Health Promoting Schools, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2006
11 김혜경, 고승덕. 우리나라 학교보건교육의 현황과 과제. 보건교육 건강증진학회지 2007;24(4):219-230   과학기술학회마을
12 Inchley J, Muldoon J, Currie C. Becoming a health promoting school: evaluating the process of effective implementation in Scotland. Health Promotion International 2007;22(1):65-71   DOI   ScienceOn
13 이정렬, 정영숙, 한주희, 이춘옥, 권인숙. 초등학교의 학교보건정책 지침개발 및 수행정도 분석. 지역사회간호학회지 2003;14(3):457-467
14 이은영, 최보율, 신영전, 김석현, 손애리, 안동현. 건강증진학교 수행 및 효과평가. 보건교육 건강증진학회지 2009;26(2):89-103   과학기술학회마을
15 Mukoma W, Flisher AJ. Evaluations of health promoting schools: A review of nine studies. Health Promotion International 2004;19(3):357-368   DOI   ScienceOn
16 윤순녕, 김영임, 최정명 등. 초, 중, 고등학교 학생, 학부모, 일반교사의 보건교육 영영별 요구도와 보건교육. 한국학교보건학회지 2005;18(1):1-14
17 교육과학기술부. 2009 학교보건급식 기본방향. 서울: 교육과학기술부, 2009
18 손애리, 김보람, 김석현, 신영전, 안동현, 최보율. WHO 건강증진학교 평가개념을 적용한 사정 및 평가. 한국학교보건교육학회지 2008;9(1):1-15