Browse > Article

Factors Effecting to the Stage of Change for Exercise on the Workers  

Seo Gi-Soon (Department of Nursing, Hyechon College)
Lee Dong-Bae (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion / v.23, no.1, 2006 , pp. 63-75 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: This study was performed to identify the related factors of change affecting the stage of change, on the assumption that there are various stages of change in the exercise behavior of workers. Method: The subjects of the study consisted of 138 workers of 10 workplaces located in Daejeon City, and data collected by using questionnaires were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 11.5 program. Results: The subjects were distributed in the stage of exercise behavior change as follows: precontemplation stage(10.9%), contemplation stage(22.5%), preparation stage(41.3%), action stage(8.7%), and maintenance stage(16.7%). Of the process of change depending on the stage of exercise behavior change, the consciousness raising(F=11.50, p=.00), dramatic relief(F=2.82, p=.02) showed significant difference in the cognitive process, and the counter conditioning(F=4.56, p=.00), reinforcement management(F=4.64, p=.00), self-liberation(F=9.46, p=.00), and stimulus control(F=13.28, p=.00) showed significant difference in the behavioral process. For decision-making depending on the stage of exercise behavior change, both the pros of decision-making(F=9.23, p=.00) and the cons of decision-making(F=2.45, p=.04) showed significant difference. Self-efficacy depending on the stage of exercise behavior change showed significant difference as F=11.50, p=.00. The related factors of change affecting the stage of exercise behavior change were the pros of decision-making, the cons of decision-making, and self-efficacy including 34.1% R-square. Conclusion: In order to change the exercise behavior of workers positively, they need to be stimulated to use the cognitive and behavioral process in the process of change properly, and to be induced to make a decision positively. And also exercise programs suitable to various characteristics of each worker as well as those of workplaces to enhance self-efficacy need to be applied after being devised. Through the further longitudinal research, it is necessary to analyze the various aspects, such as groups to select, to maintain, to stop or give up the exercise, and to avoid the change, and to study how the related factors of change affect diversity like the above.
Keywords
Transtheoritical Model; Change of Process; Decisional Making Balance; Self-Efficacy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 노동부 2002년도 일반건강진단 실시결과 통계표
2 박재현, 강상조. 의사결정균형검사에 의한 운동행동변화단계 평가. 한국체육측정평가학회지 2001:3(2) :1-12
3 서기순, 이동배. 일부 근로자의 심폐지구력에 영향올 미치는 요인. 한국산업간호학회지 2001;10(2):164-173
4 ACSM(2000). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (6th ed). Baltimore. American College of Sports Medicine, 2000
5 Marcus BH, Simkin LR, Rossi JS, Pinto BM. Longitudinal shifts in employees' stages and processes of exercise behavior change. American journal of health promotion 1996;10(3):195-200   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1983;51(3):390-395   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Sallis JF, Hovell MF. Determinants of exercise behavior. Exercise and sport sciences review 1990;18:307-330
8 DiClemente CC et al. The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1991;59(2):295-304   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Prochaska JO. Velicer WF. The transtheoritical model of health behavior change. American journal of health promotion 1997;12(1):38-48   DOI   ScienceOn
10 노동부 2001년도 일반건강진단 실시결과 통계표
11 조영숙, 이혜정. 노인의 운동행위변화단계에 따른 변화과정, 의사결정평가, 자아효능감 및 주관적 건강지각. 성인간호학회지 2003;15(2):236-246
12 김춘자. TTM을 이용한 운동행위 변화단계별 중재프로그램 개발 및 효과 〔박사학위 논문〕. 서울:연세대학교 대학원, 2001
13 Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of bebavioral change. Psychological review 1977;84(2):191-215   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Marcus BH, Simkin LR. The stage of exercise behavior. Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness 1993;33(1):83-88
15 김용권. 체력과 신체구성(BMI, WHR, %BF), 혈중지질과와 상관연구. 한국체육학회지 2001;19(1):89-97
16 한은주. 범이론적모형(Transtheoretical Model)을 이용한 사무직 근로자의 운동행위 변화단계분석 [석사학위논문] . 서울: 연세대학교 보건대학원, 2004
17 보건복지부. 국민건강영양조사.2001
18 Nigg CR, Rossi JS, Norman GJ, Benisovich SV. Process of behavior change. Redeveloping the scale. Poster presented at SBM 1999; San diego, CA
19 Marcus BH et al. Using the stage of change model to increase the adoption of physical activity among community participants. American journal of health promotion 1992(a);6(6):424-429   DOI   ScienceOn
20 이윤미. 중년여성의 운동행동변화단계에 따른 변화과정, 의사결정균형 및 자기효능감. 대한간호학회지 2004;34(2):362-371
21 Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS ,Rossi JS. Self-efficacy and the stage of exercise behavior change. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 1992(c);63(1):60-66   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Dishman RK. Increasing maintaining exercise and physical activity. Behavior therapy 1991;22: 345-378   DOI
23 Marcus BH, Owen N. Motivational readiness, self-efficacy and decision-making for exercise. Journal of applied social psychology 1992(b);22(1):3-16   DOI
24 Marcus BH. Rakowski W. Rossi JS. Assessing motivational readiness and decision making for exercise. Health psychology 1992(d);11(4):257-261   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Nigg CR, Rossi JS, Norman GJ, Benisovich SV. Structure of decisional balance for exercise adoption. Annals behavioral medicine 1998;20:s211
26 Prochaska JO et al. Stage of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. American psychological association 1994;13(1):39-46
27 이정렬 외 8명. 역학과 건강증진. 수문사, 2004
28 이명숙. 중소사업장 근로자의 운동행위 구조모형개발 [박사학위논문] 경남: 인제대학교 대학원, 2001
29 Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychοlogist 1982; 37(2): 122-147   DOI