Browse > Article

Interlayer Formation During the Reactive DC Magnetron Sputtering Process  

Lee, Jin Young (Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials)
Hur, I Min (Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials)
Lee, Jae-Ok (Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials)
Kang, Woo Seok (Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials)
Publication Information
Journal of the Semiconductor & Display Technology / v.18, no.1, 2019 , pp. 1-4 More about this Journal
Abstract
Reactive sputtering is widely used because of its high deposition rate and high step coverage. The deposition layer is often affected by target poisoning because the target conditions are changed, as well, by reactive gases during the initial stage of sputtering process. The reactive gas affects the deposition rate and process stability (target poisoning), and it also leads unintended oxide interlayer formation. Although the target poisoning mechanism has been well known, little attention has been paid on understanding the interlayer formation during the reactive sputtering. In this research, we studied the interlayer formation during the reactive sputtering. A DC magnetron sputtering process is carried out to deposit an aluminum oxide film on a silicon wafer. From the real-time process monitoring and material analysis, the target poisoning phenomena changes the reactive gas balance at the initial stage, and affects the interlayer formation during the reactive sputtering process.
Keywords
Reactive Sputtering; Target Poisoning; Interlayer Formation; Aluminum Oxide;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Carcia, P. F., McLean, R. S., Groner, M. D., Dameron, A. A., and George, S. M., "Gas diffusion ultrabarriers on polymer substrates using $Al_2O_3$ atomic layer deposition and SiN plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 106, pp. 023533 1-6, 2009.   DOI
2 Paek, S. H., Kim, I. S., Cheon, J. Y., and Chun, H. G., "Interfacial Microstructure and Electrical Properties of $Al_2O_3$/Si Interface of Mono-crystalline Silicon Solar Cells," J. of The Korean Society of Semiconductor & Display Technology, Vol. 12, pp. 41-46, 2013.
3 Haeberle, J., Henkel, K., Gargouri, H., Naumann, F., Gruska, B., Arens, M., Tallarida, M., and Schmeisser, D., "Ellipsometry and XPS comparative studies of thermal and plasma enhanced atomic layer deposited $Al_2O_3$-films," Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., Vol. 4, pp. 732-742, 2013.   DOI
4 Stankovich, S., Piner, R. D., Chen, X., Wu, N., Nguyen, S. T., and Ruoff, R. S., "Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide in the presence of poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate)," J. Mater. Chem., Vol. 16, pp 155-158, 2006.   DOI
5 Lee, J. Y., Kim, D. W., Kang, W. S., Lee, J. O., Hur, M., and Han, S. H., "Growth mechanism of $Al_2O_3$ film on an organic layer in plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition," J. Phys. D, Vol. 51, pp. 015201 1-9, 2018.   DOI
6 Hohnke, D. K., Schmatz, D. J., and Hurley, M.D., "(2002) Reactive sputter deposition: A quantitative analysis," Thin Solid Films, Vol. 118, pp. 301-310, 1984.   DOI
7 Affinito, J. D., Gross, M. E., Coronado, C. A., Graft, G. L., Greenwell, I., and Martin, P. M., "A new method for fabricating transparent barrier layers," Thin Solid Films, Vol. 290-291, pp. 63-67, 1996.   DOI
8 Anders, A., "Physics of arcing, and implications to sputter deposition," Thin Solid Films, Vol. 502, pp. 22-28, 2006.   DOI
9 Carter, D., Walde, H., McDonough, G., and Roche, G., "Parameter optimization in pulsed DC reactive sputter deposition of aluminum oxide," Soc. Vac. Coaters, Vol. 505, pp. 570-577, 2002.
10 Berg, S., and Nyberg, T., "Fundamental understanding and modeling of reactive sputtering processes," Thin Solid Films, Vol. 476, pp. 215-230, 2005.   DOI
11 Depla, D., and De Gryse, R., "Target poisoning during reactive magnetron sputtering: Part II: the influence of chemisorption and gettering," Surf. Coat. Technol., Vol. 183, pp. 190-195, 2004.   DOI