Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22788/5.4.11

Exploring the Possibility of Management Approach to Basic Income Discussion  

Tag, Dong-il (Advertising and Public Relations at Namseoul University)
Publication Information
Journal of Venture Innovation / v.5, no.4, 2022 , pp. 179-189 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the face of revolutionary changes in industry, the relationship between labor and income needs to be reconceptualized in the period of social revolution. The absolute decrease in labor due to the absence of labor is caused by automation, smartization, AI, robot labor, etc., which we must accept whether we want to or not. However, while gross social product and capital of the state or society increase, individual income is likely to decrease. During this transformation period, the state or politics must prepare for the problems caused by the decline in individual income. Until now, there have been various levels of discussion on social welfare or social security from the perspective of welfare or assistance. Attempts or studies at the experimental level have been conducted at the level of many countries or local governments and have found positive and negative effects. There is no basic income system that is widely implemented at the national level, and various discussions are taking place from a future-oriented perspective. Therefore, I propose to look at it from a new perspective based on the perspective so far. We explored that it is part of a positive approach to examine the importance and necessity of basic income in terms of working hours, quality of labor, income, quality of life, value of spare time, and work-life balance. The goal is to actively accept the absolute lack of working hours, replacement of mechanical labor, and polarization due to changes in the industry paradigm, and to look at the problems that come from a positive perspective. If we are going to accept it anyway, we should not look at these issues as short-sighted, but prepare them preemptively and establish a primitive plan from a long-term and overall perspective. Smartphones have changed the world over the past decade and have been lost, but wouldn't there be a lot of new discoveries? Shouldn't we think of it as a great opportunity to improve the quality of life through technological changes?
Keywords
Basic income; 4th Industrial Revolution; social welfare; social security; absence of labor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 가이 스탠딩 저, 안효상 옮김(2018), 일과 삶의 새로운 패러다임 기본소득, 창비, 서울
2 강남훈, 곽노완, 이봉수(2009), 즉각적이고 무조건적인 기본소득을 위하여, 민주노총.
3 경기도청(2021), https://gg.go.kr. 2022. 11. 21. 검색.
4 고상원, 권규호, 김대일, 이정민, 홍석철, 홍재화(2017), 4차 산업혁명의 효과, 한국개발연구원.
5 고용노동부(2018), 탄력적 근로시간 활용실태 조사결과 발표
6 국회입법조사처(2020), 재난기본소득의 논의와 주요 쟁점, 2020. 3. 19.
7 권용만(2022), "탄력적 근로시간제 개선에 대한 연구," 벤처혁신연구, 5(3)
8 권정임(2014), 북구 복지체제의 위기와 핀란드의 기본소득 운동, 강남훈, 곽노완의 2014, 기본소득운동의 세계적 현황과 전망, 박종철출판사.
9 기본소득 지구네트워크, https://basicincomekorea.org. 2022. 11. 21. 검색.
10 김교성, 백승호, 서정희, 이승윤(2018), 기본소득이 온다, 사회평론아카데미, 서울.
11 김덕한(2018), "로봇 때문에 내가 해고된다고? 이상하다, 로봇 덕분에 일자리가 늘어난다," 조선일보, 2018. 5. 28.
12 김완(2017), 이재명의 기본소득이 뜨겁다, 한계레21, 2017. 3. 29.
13 박가열, 천영민, 홍성민, 손양수(2016), 기술변화에 따른 일자리 영향 연구, 한국고용정보원.
14 변창흠, 안균오(2009), "개발이익 환수규모 추정과 개발부담금제도 개선방안 연구," 제3회 대한국토도시계획학회 춘계학술대회 논문집.
15 서울시(2021), 서울시 올해 약 2만명 미취업 청년에 청년수당, 참여자 모집, 보도자료, 2021. 2. 10.
16 성남시(2019), 성남시 청년배당 효과분석. 2019. 12.
17 성상훈(2021), "안철수, 모바일 정당.K기본소득 등 내놨지만...평가 '극과극'," 한국경제, 2021. 1. 5.
18 성이름(2016), 청년배당 대상자 FGI 및 설문조사 결과, 녹색전환연구소/기본소득청소년네트워크, 청년들, 청년배당에 답하다!: 성남시 청년배당 인식조사 결과발표 및 쟁점토론, 토론회 자료집, 2016. 9. 28.
19 안종석, 정재호(2021), "기본소득에 대한 연구," 연구보고서, 한국조세재정연구원, 21(10).
20 염명배(2018), "4차산업혁명 시대, 경제패러다임의 전환과 새로운 경제정책 방향," 경제연구, 한국경제통상학회, 36(4).
21 이동욱, 강모열(2021), "주당 근로시간 길수록 노동생산성은 떨어져," 중앙일보 헬스미디어, 2021. 2. 18.
22 최한수(2019), "기본소득 모의실험: 근로연령대를 중심으로," 예산정책연구, 예산정책처, 8(2).
23 이선영, 신현기(2022), "기본소득의 실현가능성 쟁점에 대한 미디어 프레임 분석," 융합사회와 공공정책, 단국대융합사회연구소, 16(1).
24 정원호, 이상준, 강남훈(2016), 4차 산업혁명 시대 기본소득이 노동시장에 미치는 효과 연구, 한국직업능력개발원.
25 최한수(2017), "각국의 기본소득 실험과 정책적 시사점," 재정포럼, 한국조세재정연구원, 251호.
26 경기도청(2021), https://gg.go.kr. 2022. 11. 21. 검색.
27 기본소득 지구네트워크, https://basicincomekorea.org. 2022. 11. 21. 검색.
28 김덕한(2018), "로봇 때문에 내가 해고된다고? 이상하다, 로봇 덕분에 일자리가 늘어난다," 조선일보, 2018. 5. 28.
29 김완(2017), 이재명의 기본소득이 뜨겁다, 한계레21, 2017. 3. 29.
30 Alaska Department of Revenue(2021), Permanent Fund Dividend Division, https://pfd.alaska.gov, 2022. 11. 21. 검색.
31 Baweja, B., Donoval, P., Haefele, M., Siddiqi, I., and Smiles.,(2016), Goos et al., 2016), Extreme Automation and Connectivity: the Global, Rigional and Investment Implications of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Paper presented at the UBS White Paper for the World Economic Annual Meeting.
32 Cho. K.Y.(2017), "The Effects of Basic Income Policy upon Income Redistribution and Labor Supply," Korea Economy Research Institute.
33 Katz, L. F. and & Kryeger, A. B.,(2016), The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the Uniter States, 1995-2015.
34 Wispelaere, J. and Stirton, L.(2017), "When basic income meets Professor Pangloss: ignoring public administration and its perils," Political Quarterly, 88(2).
35 World Economic Forum(WEF)(2016), The Future of Jobs.
36 Yoon H. S.(2017), "Basic Income, Can This Be an alternative to welfare state?," Critical Social Research, No. 54.