Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2022.33.1.025

Cataloging Trends after LRM and its Acceptance in KORMARC Bibliographic Format  

Lee, Mihwa (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과 및 학교도서관연구소)
Lee, Eun-Ju (동의대학교 문헌정보학과)
Rho, Jee-Hyun (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.33, no.1, 2022 , pp. 25-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was to develop KORMARC-bibliographic format reflecting cataloging trends after LRM using literature review, analysis of MARC 21 discussion papers, and comparison of the fields in MARC 21 and KORMARC. The acceptance and consideration of fields and sub-fields that need to be revised in KORMARC are as follows. First, in terms of LRM / RDA, fields 381 or 387 for the representative expression, field 881 and the change and addition of its sub-fields for the manifestation statement, and data provenance code to ▾7 sub-field for date provenance may be considered. Second, in terms of Linked Data, ▾1 sub-field for RWO, and field 758 for related work identifier can be added. Third, for the data exchange of KORMARC and BIBFRAME, it should be developed in consideration of mapping with BIBFRAME classes and attributes in KORMARC. Fourth, additional fields such as 251 version information, 334 mode of issuance, 335 expansion plan, 341 accessibility content, 348 format of notated music, 353 supplementary content characteristics, 532 accessibility note, 370 associated place, 385 audience characteristics, 386 creator/contributor characteristics, 388 time period of creation, 688 subject added entry-type of entity unspecified, 884 description conversion information, 885 matching information could be developed. This study will be used to revise KORMARC-bibliographic format and to build and utilize bibliographic data in domestic libraries.
Keywords
KORMARC; MARC 21; LRM; RDA; RDF; Linked Data; Representative Expression; Manifestation Statement; Data Provenance; RWO;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office (2021b). MARC Discussion Papers. Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/mac/list-dp.html
2 Lee, M. (2019). Considerations for BIBFRAME acceptance of expression and representative expression attributes in LRM. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 30(2), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.2.033   DOI
3 Lee, M. (2021). A Study on considerations in the authority control to accommodate LRM nomen. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.52.1.202103.109   DOI
4 Lee, S. & Lee, J. (2018). Study on Conversion between MARC 21 and BIBFRAME 2.0. Journal of Social Science, 29(3), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2018.07.29.3.73   DOI
5 ALA, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, & CILIP (2020). RDA Toolkit. Available: http://www.rdatoolkit.org/
6 Frank, P. (2017, October 30). Interview by Author [Voice Recording and Author Paper]
7 Glennan, K. (2018). Representative Expression. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/Representative%20expressions.pdf
8 Glennan, K. (2019b). RDA 3R Project: Stabilization Phase. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/3R%20Stabilization%20Phase%20Glennan%20PCC%20OpCo.pdf
9 Library of Congress (2021). MARC21 to BIBFRAME 2.0 Conversion Specifications Available: https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/mtbf/
10 Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office (2021a). MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data. Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/
11 Glennan, K. (2019c). Getting a Handle on the New RDA Toolkit. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/Getting%20a%20Handle%20on%20the%20New%20RDA%20Toolkit%20rev.pdf
12 Riva, P., Boeuf, P. L., & Zumer, M. (2017b). Transition Mapping: User Tasks, Entities, Attributes, and Relationships in FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD Mapped to Their Equivalents in the IFLA Library Reference Model. Available: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/transitionmappings201708.pdf
13 McCallum, S. (2017). BIBFRAME Development. JLIS.it, 8(3), 71-85. Available: https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12415   DOI
14 Mitchell, E. T. (2013). Three case studies in linked open data. Library Technology Reports, 2013(July), 26-43.
15 Riva, P., Boeuf, P. L., & Zumer, M. (2017a). IFLA Library Reference Model. 이미화 번역 (2020). IFLA 도서관 참조 모형. 서울: 국립중앙도서관. Available: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712-ko.pdf
16 Young, T. (2019, Jully 22). Data Provenance. Reseouce Description & Access. Available: https://www.slideshare.net/ALAeLearningSolutions/special-topics-data-provenance
17 Glennan, K. (2019a). The New RDA Toolkit: Everything Has Changed or Has It?. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/Glennan%20RDA%20TK%20-%20everything%20has%20changed%20Feb%202019.pdf