1 |
Lee, S. & Seol, M. (2017). A study of redesigning electronic records management policies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 52, 5-37. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.52.005
DOI
|
2 |
Lee, S. Y. (2017). The Admissibility of Digital Evidence. The Justice, 161, 164-199.
|
3 |
Lee, Y. J. & Lee, S. Y. (2009). A policy framework for the long-term preservation of authentic digital records: based on InterPARES studies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 19, 193-249.
|
4 |
Seol, M. W. (2005). Quality criteria for measuing authenticity, reliability, integrity and usability of records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 11, 41-90.
|
5 |
Youn, E. (2019). A study on the concepts of record from a legal perspective. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 60, 89-121. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089
DOI
|
6 |
Duranti, L. & MacNeil, H. (1997). The preservation of the integrity of electronic records: an overview of the UBC-MAS research project. Archivaria, 42, 46-67. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12153
|
7 |
Duranti, L. & Rogers, C. ed. (2019). Trusting Records in the Cloud. London: Facet Publishing.
|
8 |
Duranti, L. (1995). Reliability and authenticity: the concepts and their implications. Archivaria, 39, 5-10. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12063
|
9 |
Duranti, L., Eastwood, T., & MacNeil, H. (2002). Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
10 |
Electronic records as documentary evidence. Canadian General Standards Board(CGBS): 2017.
|
11 |
Federal Rules of Evidence.
|
12 |
Information and documentation - Records management - Core concepts and vocabulary. ISO 30300:2020.
|
13 |
Lee, S. W. (2012). Electronic evidence and best evidence rule. Contemporary Review of Criminal Law, 36, 50-104. https://doi.org/10.23026/crclps.2012..36.002
DOI
|
14 |
Duranti, L. (2001). The impact of digital technology on archival science. Archival Science, 1, 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435638
DOI
|
15 |
Duranti, L. (1989). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science(Part I). Archivaria, 28, 7-27.
|
16 |
Duranti, L. & Eastwood, T. (1995). Protecting electronic evidence: a progress report on a research study and its methodology. Archivi and Computer, Roma, 3, 213-50.
|
17 |
Jansen, A. (2015). Object-oriented diplomatics: Using archival diplomatics in software application development to support authenticity of digital records. Records Management Journal, 25(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2014-0022
DOI
|
18 |
Shepherd, E. & Yeo, G. (2003). Managing Records: a handbook of principles and practice. London: Facet Publishing.
|
19 |
Criminal Procedure Act. No. 17572.
|
20 |
Law Dictionary (2021, January 15). Hearsay Evidence. Available: https://terms.naver.com/entry.naver?docId=3654451&cid=42131&categoryId=42131
|
21 |
Enforcement Degree of the Public Records Management Act. No. 31380.
|
22 |
Public Records Management Act. No. 16661.
|
23 |
Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: Concepts and principles, ISO 15489-1:2016.
|
24 |
Choi, Y. M. (2018). Archival Analysis on Requirements for Admissibility of Evidence of Electronic Records. Master's thesis, PUSAN National University, Korea.
|
25 |
Judicial Policy Research Institute (2015). Research on Determining the Admissibility of Digital Evidence.
|
26 |
InterPARES 2 Project (2008). Terminology Cross-domain Task Force Report(including Appendix 22).
|
27 |
Lee, K. (2019). A study on authentication model using blockchain. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 59, 47-79. http://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.047
DOI
|
28 |
Information and documentation - Records management processes - Metadata for records: Part 1: Principles. ISO 23081-1:2017.
|
29 |
InterPARES 1 Authenticity Task Force (2002). Requirements for Assessing and Maintaining the Authenticity of Electronic Records(Appendix 2).
|
30 |
MacNeil, H. & Gilliland-Swetland, A. (2005). Authenticity Task Force Report. In Duranti, L. ed. The Long-Term Preservation of Authentic Electronic Records: http://www.interpares.org/book/
|
31 |
Rogers, C. (2016). A literature review of authenticity of records in digital systems: from 'machine-readable' to records in the cloud. acervo, rio de janeiro, 29(2), 16-44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320593846
|