Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.4.029

A Study on the Considerations for Constructing RDA Application Profiles  

Lee, Mihwa (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.30, no.4, 2019 , pp. 29-50 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was to suggest the considerations for application profiles of 2019 revised RDA using literature reviews and case studies according to new RDA that revised in order to reflect the LRM and linked data. First, the additional elements were recommended as the contents of application profiles such as inverse element, broader element, narrow element, domain, range, alternate label name, mapping to MARC, mapping to BIBFRAME, and RDA description examples as new elements as well as element name, element ID, element URL, description method, vocabulary encoding scheme, data provenance element, data provenance value, and notes as the elements that were already suggested by previous researches. Second, RDA rules' representations in forms of flow chart and application profiles through analyzing RDA rules were suggested in order to apply the rules to RDA application profiles to structure the rules in which every element has 4 types of description method, many conditions, and options. Third, the RDA mapping to BIBFRAME was suggested in RDA application profiles because RDA and BIBFRAME are co-related in context of content standard and encoding format, and mapping BIBFRAME and RDA is necessitated for programming BIBFRAME editors with RDA as content standard. This study will contribute to find the methods for constructing RDA application profiles and BIBFRAME application profiles with RDA as content standard.
Keywords
Application Profile; AP; RDA; RDA 3R; LRM; BIBFRAME;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, Mihwa. 2019. "A Study on Analyzing the Features of 2019 Revised RDA." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3): 97-116.   DOI
2 DCMI. 2006. DCMI Glossary. [online]. [cited 2019.7.6]. .
3 Dunsire, Gordon. 2018. LRM and RDA: Overview of the 3R Project. [online]. [cited 2019.7.6]. .
4 Dunsire, Gordon. 2019a. Application Profiles and Cataloging a Manifestation. [online]. [cited 2019.8.17]. .
5 Dunsire, Gordon. 2019b. A Deeper Dive into Application Profiles and Policy Statements. [online]. [cited 2019.8.17]. .
6 Dunsire, Gordon. 2019c. Application Profiles. [online]. [cited 2019.8.17]. .
7 Duval, Erik, Wayne Hodgiins, Stuart Sutton, and Stuart L. Weibel. 2002. "Metadata Principles and Practicalities." D-Lib Magaine, 8(4): 1082-9873. [online]. [cited 2019.6.17]. .
8 Gartner, Richard. 2016. Metadata: Shaping Knowledge from Antiquity to the Semantic Web. Switzerland: Springer
9 Glennan, Kathy. 2019. RDA 3R Project-Stabilization Phase. [online]. [cited 2019.8.17]. .
10 Johnston, Pete. 2003. "Metadata and Interoperability in a Complex World." Ariadne, 37. [online]. [cited 2019.6.17]. .
11 LD4. 2019. Sinopia Editor. [online]. [cited 2019.8.30]. .
12 Library of Congress. 2019. BIBFRAME Profiles Editor. [online]. [cited 2019.8.30].
13 Miller, E., V. Mueller, U. Ogbuji, and M. Baker. 2014. BIBFRAME Profiles: Introduction and Specification. [online]. [cited 2019.9.6]. .
14 RSC. 2019. Application Profiles. [online]. [cited 2019.10.5]. .
15 Williamschen, Jodi. 2018. The Library of Congress BIBFRAME Editor. [online]. [cited 2019.10.3]. .
16 Zeng, M. L. and J. Qin. 2016. Metadata. 2nd ed. Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman.