Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.2.069

A Study on Analysis of Research Data Repository in Humanities and Social Sciences  

Cho, Jane (인천대학교 문헌정보학과)
Park, Jong-Do (인천대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.30, no.2, 2019 , pp. 69-87 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the discussions on sharing research data prevail by the chance of the inauguration of the International Open Data Charter, research support organizations in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan are encouraging researchers to deposit their findings in a credible repository. Humanities and social sciences field, in which research data sharing culture and storage infrastructure are immature compared to life science and natural science, also needs to establish and operate a reliable storage infrastructure to guarantee the continuous access and utilization of data. This study analyzed the overall operational status of 305 subject repositories registered in re3data for the humanities and social sciences and clustered them according to the operational level using 5 indicators. As a result, 70% of the population were identified as universal clusters, and 20% of the excellent cluster was found to have the largest number of linguistic fields and the German-operated. In addition, this study confirmed through correspondence analysis that there is a relation between the sub-theme fields of humanities and social sciences and the types of data to be archived. The history and art domians are related to images, and social studies are related to statistical data. Linguistics has also been analyzed to be related to audio, plain text, and code.
Keywords
RDR(Research data repository); re3data; Humanities and Social Science; Open access;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ko, B. 2001. "Research on Cyber Shopping Mall using Correspondence Analysis." The Korean Data Analysis Society, 3(4): 419-427.
2 Ko, M. and G. Bae. 2011. "A Study of the Integrated Operation for Databases with Different Data Structures." Korea Society for Library and Information Science, 45(3): 69-85.   DOI
3 Minamiyama, Y. 2017. "Core Unified Requirement of Reliable Data Repository." Current Awareness-E, 320. [cited 2018.11.2]. .
4 Seoul National University. 2010. Research Ethics Guidelines for Seoul School. [online]. [cited 2018.11.5]. .
5 Shin, Y. and Y. Chung. 2012. "Study on the Improvement Plans of the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Data Archives in Korea." Korea Society for Archive and Record Management, 12(3): 93-115.
6 Shim, Y., H. Ahn, and J. Byun. 2015. "Strategies for Improving the Collection and Use of Research Data in the Humanities." Korea Society for Library and Information Science, 49(3): 155-183.   DOI
7 Lee, J., J. Kim, S. Choi, and I. Kim. 2007. "A Study on Design and Analysis of Metadata and Ontology based on Humanities and Social Sciences." Korea Society for Library and Information Science, 41(2): 291-316.   DOI
8 Cho, J. 2016. "Study about Research Data Citation Based on DCI (Data Citation Index)." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(1): 189-207.   DOI
9 Whang, J. and A. Yoo. 2016. "Study of Korean Research Memory Visualization Services." Proceedings of Korea Society for Library and Information Management, 97-100.
10 Choi, Y. and Y. Choi. 2015. Study on Metadata Standards (DDI_2 vs DDI_3). Symposium on the 5th National Statistical Methodology. [online]. [cited 2018.11.5]. .
11 CENDI. 2017. Implementation of public access programs in federal agencies. [online]. [cited 2019.3.2]. .
12 Center for Open Data in the Humanities. 2017. [online]. [cited 2019.3.5]. .
13 Cho, J. 2019. "Study of Asian RDR based on re3data." The Electronic Library, 37(2): 302-313.   DOI
14 Gutmann, M., K. Schurer, D. Donakowski, and Hilary Beedham. 2006. "The Selection, Appraisal, and Retention of Social Science Data." Data Science Journal, 3: 209-221. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.3.209   DOI
15 ICSU. 2016 Core Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements [online]. [cited 2019.3.5]. .
16 Kim, S. and M. Choi. 2017. "Registry Metadata Quality Assessment by the Example of re3data.org Schema." International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 7(2): 41-51.   DOI
17 Kindling, M. et al. 2017. The Landscape of Research Data Repositories in 2015: A re3data Analysis: D-Lib Magazine. 23(3/4). [online]. [cited 2018.11.5]. .
18 OECD. 2007. OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
19 Rasmussen, K. B. and G. Blank. 2007. "The Data Documentation Ini- tiative: A Preservation Standard for Research." Archival Science, 7(1): 55-71.   DOI
20 Pampel, H. et al. 2013. "Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The re3data.org Registry." PLOS ONE, 8(11): 1-10. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078080   DOI
21 Van den Eynden, V., L. Corti, M. Woollard, L. Bishop, and L. Horton. 2011. Managing and sharing data; A Best Practice Guide for Researchers. [online]. [cited 2018.11.5]. .
22 DataCite. 2012. Business models principles. [online]. [cited 2019.3.5]. .