Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.2.185

A Study on the Comparative Analysis of the Description Rules of ISBD and KCR4  

Lee, Mihwa (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.24, no.2, 2013 , pp. 185-203 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was to suggest the new rules for revision of KCR4 by comparing between ISBD consolidated edition and KCR4. The study methods was to compare the rules in each element after mapping the description elements in each area of ISBD and KCR4. Resultingly, first, content forms and media types must be included for describing resource types. Second, it is needed for rules about the common title and the dependent title. Third, it is needed for rules about "parallel" such as parallel title, parallel other title information, parallel statement of responsibility relating to title, parallel edition statement, parallel statement of responsibility relating to edition, parallel numbering system, parallel place of publication, production and distribution, et. al. Fourth, the rules about material or type of resource specific area must be regulated in terms of the contents of the resource. Fifth, the home country principle must be not applied in describing the place of publication, production and distribution for the consistency. Sixth, it is needed to regulate the extent, other physical details, dimensions, and accompanying material statement for all materials instead of the material description according to material types. Seventh, rule number of notes must be agreed to number of main rules. Eighth, it is needed for detailed rules about resource identifier. This study might be contributed to revise the KCR4.
Keywords
ISBD Consolidated Edition; ISBD; RDA; FRBR; Content Form; Content Qualification; Media Type; KCR4; Interoperability;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 이미화. 2011b. KCR4 GMD 및 SMD 기술의 새 로운 방안 모색. <한국도서관․정보학회지>, 42(2): 237-255.
2 김정현. 2003. ISBD(CR)의 특성과 서지기술에 관한 연구. <한국도서관․정보학회지>, 34(3): 147-167.
3 박진희. 2009. RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구. <한국도서관․정보학회지>, 40(2): 111-138.
4 이미화. 2011a. AACR2에서 RDA로 목록규칙 변화에 따른 KCR4의 고려사항에 관한 연구. <정보관리학회지>, 28(1): 23-42.
5 Discussion-1-Alignment.pdf>. Delsey, T. 2009. AACR2 versus RDA in From rules to entities: cataloging with RDA [online]. [cited 2010.10.11]. .
6 이미화. 2012. ISBD 통합판의 서지기술 특징 및 고려사항에 관한 연구. <문헌정보학회지>, 46(4): 169-188.
7 한국도서관협회. 2003. <한국목록규칙> 4판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
8 Dunsire, G. and IFLA Cataloguing Section's ISBD Review Group. 2012. Alignment of the ISBD: International Standard Bibliographic Description element set with RDA: Resource Description & Access element set [online]. [cited 2013.1.16].
9 Hitchens, A and E. Symons. 2009. "Preparing catalogers for RDA Training." Cataloging & classification Quarterly, 47(8): 691- 707.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Section. 2011. ISBD: International Standard Bibliographic Description(ISBD). Consolidated edition. Berlin: Saur.