Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.1.045

A Study on the Construction Methods for Author Identification System of Research Outcome based on ORCID  

Cho, Jane (인천대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.24, no.1, 2013 , pp. 45-62 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since research articles aren't be fixed in particular system, author name of articles have been handled not by authority control but by unique identifier. While unique identifier has a tendency that moves toward open-transparent global link system, lately ORCID has been initiated. ORCID is not only link diverse existing ID system as a partner, for example, publisher's ID systems, university's research assessment systems, manuscript tracking systems but also let researchers self-claim by themselves to identify their own articles. Though, since ORCID run based on overseas' publications, it is not appropriate to adapt ORCID shortly to Korean researcher's identification. So this study suggests the direction of domestic researcher's identification system by applying ORCID.
Keywords
Research Outcome; Researcher; Name Disambiguration; ORCID;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ikki, O. 2010. Metadata design on academic information services, The journal of Information Science and Technology Association, 60(12): 495-500 [online]. [cited 2012.11.25]. .
2 Library of Congress. 2011. Library of Congress Name Authority File(LC / NAF). [online]. [cited 2012.11.25]. .
3 Shillum, C. 2012. ORCID Update, CNI CNI Scholarly Identity Workshop Baltimore, Apr [online]. [cited 2013.2.5]. .
4 Smith-Yoshimura, K. 2009. Networking Names [online]. [cited 2012.12.25]. . .
5 Strotmann, Andreas and Danzhi Zhao. 2012. "Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make in author-based citation analysis?" Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9): 1820-1833.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Wagner, A.B. 2009. Author Identification Systems. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 59 [online]. [cited 2013. 2.10]. .
7 WATANABE, T. 2010. Authority control: Today and the future, The journal of Information Science and Technology Association, 60(9): 371-377 [online]. [cited 2012.12.29]. .
8 이석형, 곽승진. 2012. 전거데이터 기반 학술논문 검색시스템의 구축 및 평가에 관한 연구. <한국문헌정보학회지>, 46(2): 133-156.
9 김현정. 2012. 인용분석에서의 모호한 저자명 식별을 위한 방법들에 관한 고찰. <한국비블리아학회지>, 23(3): 5-17.
10 藏川 圭, 武田 英明. 2011. 研究者識別子ORCID の取り組み. <情報管理>, 54(10): 622-631.
11 藏川 圭. 2011. 動向レビュー：著者の名寄 せと研究者識別子ORCID, カレント アウェアネス, CA 1740, [online]. [cited 2011.7.7]. .
12 谷藤 幹子. 2010. ORCID 活用と(日本學術誌への)提案 ― 著者名の同定という 共通課題を克服するために, <著者ID の動向>, 第7回 SPARC Japanセミ ナー2010, [online]. [cited 2012.9.7]. .
13 武田 英明. 2010. ORCID とは何か, 第 64回 著者 HC の動向, [online]. [cited 2012.5.7]. .
14 守本 瞬. 2011. 著者の識別に向けて: オープ ンアクセス環境下における同定機能 導 入のための恒久識別子實証實驗, [online]. [cited 2012.5.7]. .
15 Danskin, A., A. Hill, and D. Needham. 2011. The Names Project: A New Approach to Name Authority. ISQ Information Standards Quarterly, 23(3): 14-17.   DOI
16 Fenner, M. 2011a. Author Identifier Overview. LIBREAS. Library Ideas, 18: 24-29 [online]. [cited 2012.5.18]. .
17 Fenner, M. 2011b. ORCID: Unique Identifiers for Autors and Contributers. ISQ Information Standards Quaterly, 23(3): 10-13.   DOI
18 강인수 외. 2008. 저자 식별을 위한 자질 비교. <한국콘텐츠학회논문지>, 8(2): 41-47.
19 이용효. 2000. <학술정보 전거 DB 시스템이 개발과 구축에 관한 연구>. 서울: 한국교 육학술정보원.
20 ORCID Homepage. [cited 2013.3.8]. .
21 Ratne, H. 2011a. ORCID Brief Introduction [online]. [cited 2012.5.20]. .
22 Ratne, H. 2011b. ORCID: An Open Registry of Scholarly IDs, AAP-PSP Annual Meeting Feburary, 2011 [online]. [cited 2012.5.25]. .