Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.4.005

Subject Based Classification: Conceptualization and the Development Plan as a Classificatory System  

Baek, Ji-Won (이화여자대학교 문헌정보학 전공)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.23, no.4, 2012 , pp. 5-24 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this study is 1) to analyse the historical development and current condition of the subject based classification(SBC), 2) to clarify the function and to categorize the specific kind of SBC, for its conceptualization and the development plan. For this purpose, almost 30 cases, for the period 1937 through now, were analyzed concerning their terms used in the names and the specific kinds as SBC. In addition, the analysis was made regarding how the SBC fulfill the selected main functions as a classificatory scheme and how SBC is inter-related with the other knowledge organization systems(KOS) such as classification and subject heading. Based on the above analysis, the conclusion addressed that SBC could be defined in consideration of the detailed function, type, information environment, and interconnection among the KOS, and suggested the future development plan of SBC as a classification scheme.
Keywords
Subject Based Classification; User Interest Classification; Subject; User; Classification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김명옥. 1986. 자료분류법. 서울: 구미무역.
2 김태수. 2000. 분류의 이해. 서울: 문헌정보처리연구회.
3 노지현. 2010. 장르 분류의 사례를 통해 본 도서관 분류의 의미: 북미 공공도서관을 중심으로. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 41(4): 151-169.
4 백지원. 2010. 주제어 기반 분류에 관한 연구: 미국 공공도서관의 사례를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(4): 179-201.
5 백지원. 2011. 이용자 중심의 주제어 기반 분류를 위한 주제명 개발에 관한 연구: 지식조직체계 분석을 바탕으로. 정보관리학회지, 28(1): 171-193.
6 심 경. 2008. 차세대 도서관 목록. 도서관문화, 49(9): 22-28.
7 오경은, 김기영. 2008. 도서탐색용이성에 관한 연구: 공공도서관과 대형서점의 분류방식을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 25(4): 25-42.
8 윤희윤. 2011. 정보자료분류론. 대구: 태일사.
9 Baker, Sharon L. and Karen L. Wallace. 2002. The responsive public library how to develop and market a winning collection. 2nd ed. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
10 BISG. 2010. BISG Subject Headings List. Major Subjects - 2010 Editions. [online]. [cited 2011.4.20]. .
11 Casey, Michael and Michael Stephens. 2009. "It's fine to drop Dewey." Library Journal, 134(12): 19.
12 Conarton, Stephanie and Patricia Ewing. 2010. "Dewey or don't we: making library collections more accessible." 3-5, March. COSUGI 2010 Annual Conference.
13 Courtright, H. R. 2010. "The national impact of the Dewey-less library." Public Libraries, July/August 2010: 15-17.
14 Dunkin, Paul Shaner. 1942. Classification and the scholar. College and Research Libraries, 3(3): 333-341. [online]. [cited 2012.3.5]. .   DOI
15 Fialkoff, F. 2009. It's not about Dewey. Library Journal, 134(18): 8.
16 Hosseini-Ara, Moe. 2012a. CIL2012 Day 2 Session 1: "C3: Customer-Centered Classification." [online]. [cited 2012.9.20]. .
17 Hosseini-Ara, Moe. 2012b. "Re: about C3 classification scheme." 전자우편. 2012.10.17.
18 Hulme, E. Wundham. 1911. Library Association Record, vols. 12-14. Phillips, W. Howard. 1961. A primer of book classification. London: Association of Assistant Librarians에서 재인용.
19 Hyman, Richard J. 1980. Shelf classification research: past, present, future? Occasional papers. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Graduate School of Library Science ; no.146. [online]. [cited 2011.5.22]..
20 Kelley, Grace O. 1937. The classification of books: an inquiry into its usefulness to the reader. New York: Wilson.
21 Langridge, Derek Wilton. 1992. Classification: its kinds, elements, system and applications. London: Bowker-Saur.
22 Losee, Robert M. 1995. "How to study classification systems and their appropriateness for individual institutions." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19(3/4): 45-58.   DOI
23 Ludwig, Sarah. 2010. "Dewey-lite." Public Libraries, July/August: 17-20.
24 Maltby, Arthur. 1978. Sayers' manual of classification for librarians. London: The Trinity Press.
25 NISO. 2005. ANSI/NISO Z39.19 - Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies. (R2010).
26 Oder, Norman. 2010. PLA 2010 Conference: Cracking the Code: Beyond Dewey. [online]. [cited 2011.11.20]. .
27 Orvig, Mary. 1955. "The reader interest arrangement, an American shelving system with a future." Libri, 5(3): 223-232.
28 Phillips, W. Howard. 1961. A primer of book classification. London: Association of Assistant Librarians.
29 Rutzen, Ruth. 1959. A classification for the reader. In F. T. Eaton and D. E. Strout (eds). 1959. The role of classification in the modern American library: papers presented at an institute conducted by the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library Science, November 1-4, 1959. Urbana, Il: Graduate School of Library Science: 53-61. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. [online]. [cited 2012.1.24]. .
30 Richardson, Ernest Cushing. 1930. Classification: Theoretical and Practical. 3rd ed. New York: H.W. Wilson. Phillips, W. Howard. 1961. A primer of book classification. London: Association of Assistant Librarians에서 재인용.
31 Sapiie, Jacquelyn. 1995. "Reader-interest classification." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19(3): 143-155.   DOI
32 Savage, Ernest A. 1949. Manual of book classification and display for public libraries. London: G. Allen & Unwin.
33 Schneider, Karen G. 2007. "Raising Arizona." [online]. [cited 2012.8.20]. .
34 Siess, Judith A. 2003. The visible librarian: asserting your value with marketing and advocacy. Chicago: American Library Association.
35 Tuttlea, Jonathan. 2012. "The aphasia of modern subject access." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(4): 263-275.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Webb, T. D. 1985. "Phoenix public library: reorganization based on a hierarchy of user types." In Reorganization in the public library. 52-66. Phoenix: ORYX Press.
37 Woodward, Jeannette. 2005. Creating the customer-driven library: building on the bookstore model. Chicago: American Library Association.