Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.1.005

A Study on Ontology Architecture for FRSAD Model  

Lee, Hye-Won (서울여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.23, no.1, 2012 , pp. 5-26 More about this Journal
Abstract
Mapping FRSAD and other ontology models intends to suggest a higher knowledge level that is independent of any information implementation system or specific context, and to endeavor to focus on the semantics, knowledge structures, subject access, and interoperability. Providing an application of FRSAD model to information environment and representing and sharing the information within the library sector and beyond, there needs encoding scheme for knowledge representation. This study suggested an OWL based ontology architecture for FRSAD model and demonstrated the pilot FRSAD ontology model using Prot$\acute{e}$g$\acute{e}$ software.
Keywords
FRSAD(Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data); Ontology Architecture; SKOS(Simple Knowledge Organization System); OWL(Web Ontology Language); DCMI(Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Abstract Model); Semantics; Knowledge Structures; Subject Access; Interoperability;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 박지영. 2011. 서지레코드의 주제전거를 위한 FRSAD 모형 연구. 정보관리연구, 42(1): 113-135.
2 안영희, 이성숙. 2009. IFLA FRAD 모형이 관련 표준에 미친 영향 연구. 정보관리학회지, 26(1): 279-303.
3 오삼균, 원선민. 2007. 이용자 참여형 시맨틱 디지털도서관 아키텍처 설계. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2): 229-251.
4 유사라. 2007. 특정주제 정보관리를 위한 온톨로지 모형연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(1): 31-53.
5 유사라, 이혜원, 송인석. 2009. 연구자 중심 연구 성과물 의미검색을 위한 인문사회 학술 용어 온톨로지 적용 및 유지관리 체계 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 43(2): 277- 298.
6 이혜원. 2008. 자원공유를 위한 온톨로지기반 컬렉션 단위 기술 모형개발 연구. 정보관리학회지, 25(3): 209-230.
7 이혜원, 윤소영. 2011. 역사용어 온톨로지 모형 적용 방안 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 22(1): 263-280.
8 제등효. 2008a. 온톨로지 알고리즘. 2, 정보시스템의 의미론. 최석두, 김이겸 옮김. 파주: 한울.
9 제등효. 2008b. 온톨로지 알고리즘. 1, 기록.정보․지식의 세계. 최석두, 한상길 옮 김. 파주: 한울.
10 한성국, 이현실. 2006. 시소러스를 활용한 온톨로지 구축방안 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 17(1): 285-303.
11 AAT. [cited 2011.11.20]. .
12 Categories for the Description of Works of Art (CDWA). 2000. Eds. Baca, M. and Harpring Patricia. The J. Paul Getty Trust and College Art Association. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute. [online]. [cited 2012.1.30]. .
13 DCMI. 2007. DCMI Abstract Model. [online]. [cited 2012.12.28]. .
14 IFLA Working Group on FRANAR and Glenn Patton. 2009. Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A Conceptual Model. Munchen: K.G. Saur.
15 IFLA Working Group on FRSAR, Marcia Zeng, Maja Zumer and Athena Salaba. 2011. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data(FRSAD). Berlin ; New York, NY: De Gruyter.
16 LCSH. [cited 2011.11.20]. .
17 MeSh. [cited 2011.11.20]. .
18 Miles, Alistair and Perez-Aguera, Jose R. 2007. "SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organization for the Web Cataloging & Classification." Quarterly, 43(3/4): 69-83.
19 Ogden, C. K. and I. A. Richards. 1923. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20 Protege. [cited 2012.1.20]. .
21 W3C. 2004. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. [online]. [cited 2011.12.15]. .
22 W3C.2005. SKOS Core Guide; W3C Working Draft 2. [online]. [cited 2012.1.5]. .
23 W3C. 2009a. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language New Features and Rationale. [online]. [cited 2011.12.15]. .
24 W3C. 2009b. SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Primer. [online]. [cited 2011.8.20]. .
25 Zeng, Marcia Lei, Maja Zumer. 2009a. Introducing FRSAD and Mapping it with SKOS and other models. [online]. [cited 2011.12.25]. .
26 Zeng, Marcia Lei, Maja Zumer. 2009b. Introducing FRSAD and Mapping it with Other Models. IFLA2009, Milan, Italy. [online]. [presentation document]. [cited 2012.12.25]. .