DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생의 과제 수행에서 ChatGPT 활용 경험과 효과적인 학습 활동에 관한 수업 사례 연구

A Case Study of Using ChatGPT in College Students' Assignment and Effective Learning Activities

  • 투고 : 2024.08.22
  • 심사 : 2024.09.29
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30

초록

연구 목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 대학 수업에서 학생들이 ChatGPT를 직접 활용해 보고, 그 경험을 성찰해 보고, 그 경험의 의미를 찾고, 효과적으로 활용할 방안을 제안하고자 함이다. 연구 내용 및 방법 : 일반교육과 기독교교육에서의 ChatGPT 관련 이슈, 대학 교육에서 교수자와 학습자의 ChatGPT 활용 경험, 효과적인 학습활동에 대해 선행연구를 살펴보았다. ChatGPT를 활용한 학생들의 경험은 어떠했는지, 장단점은 무엇이었는지, 경험을 바탕으로 학생들이 제시한 교수자와 학습자로서 활용 방안은 무엇이었는지, 효과적인 학습활동은 무엇이었는지 확인하였다. 결론 및 제언 : 첫째, ChatGPT를 수업에 활용하고자 할 때, 관련 내용을 설명하고, 활용 방법과 범위를 명확하게 제시해야 한다. 둘째, ChatGPT를 사용할 때, 여러 측면에서 학습자의 역량을 신장시키는 활용 방안을 고려해야 한다. 셋째, 과학 기술의 발달로 인한 여러 학습 도구와 방법을 효과적으로 적절하게 잘 사용하는 인간 교사의 역할을 잘 감당하도록 교육이 필요하다. 넷째, 교수자가 수업을 설계하고 수행할 때, ChatGPT를 활용하기 위해 다양한 방법을 시도해야 한다.

Purpose of study : The purpose of this study is to suggest ways for students to use ChatGPT directly in college classes, reflect on the experience, find the meaning of the experience, and use it effectively. Research content and method : Previous studies were examined on ChatGPT-related issues in general and Christian education, the experiences of instructors and learners who used ChatGPT in university education, and effective learning activities. The students' experiences of using ChatGPT were examined, identifying the pros and cons, the suggestions made by students as both instructors and learners based on their experiences, and the effective learning activities. Conclusions and suggestions : First, when you want to use ChatGPT in class, you must explain the relevant content and clearly present the method and scope of use. Second, when using ChatGPT, it is necessary to consider ways to utilize it to increase learners' competence in many aspects. Third, education is needed to fulfill the role of human teachers who effectively and appropriately use various learning tools and methods well due to the development of science and technology. Fourth, when instructors design and perform classes, various methods must be tried to utilize ChatGPT.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kam, S. W., Kim, M. H. (2024). A study on the development of AI utilization guide components at a Christian university. Journal of Christian education in Korea, 77, 171-201.
  2. Kim, D. I. (2017). Coping challenges with future minds and responsible/authentic leadership in an artificial intelligence era. Journal of Christian education in Korea, 51, 75-100.
  3. Kim, D. M., Jang, B. H. (2021). Learner-centered efficiency analysis of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in college English classes: Focusing on TOEIC. Humanities and social sciences, 12(5), 47-62.
  4. Kim, J. J. (2018). The 4th industrial revolution and new perspective to educational pastoral care: Focus on artificial intelligence age. Journal of Christian education in Korea, 55, 47-88.
  5. Kim, T. J., Han, S. L. (2023). An exploratory study on social issues related to ChatGPT: Focusing on news big data-based topic modeling analysis. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 24(6), 1209-1220.
  6. Nam, S. W. (2023). Implications for the direction of Christian education in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Christian education in Korea, 74, 107-134.
  7. Park, E. H. (2023). A study on the experience of writing a learning reflection journal: Focusing on the case of biblical teaching method class. Journal of Christian education in Korea, 75, 59-81.
  8. Park, H. Y., Shin, I. S., Lim, S. A., Lim, D. M., Moon, J. M. (2024). Theory and Practice of AI-Based Convergence Education. Seoul: Dongmoonsa.
  9. Bae, S. H., Kim, H. J. (2013). Influenctial factors for the academic challenge of university students: Mutual impact of learning supportive environment, student-faculty interaction, and active and collaborative learning. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 21(4), 201-225.
  10. Seoul City (2023). Generative AI ethics guidelines.
  11. Song, Y. M., Y, S. B., Kim, M. J. (2018). The effects of university students' institutional commitment, professor-student interaction, and positive and collaborative learning activities on university students' satisfaction. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(10), 977-995.
  12. Shin, H. J., Min, H. R. (2009). Effects of students' majors on the relationship between perceived learning experiences and course satisfaction of undergraduate students. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 49-72.
  13. Oh, S. K. (2023). A study on the case of using CHatGPT & learners' perception in college liberal arts writing. Korean Journal of General Education, 17(3), 11-23.
  14. Ok, J. H. (2024). Efficient use of artificial intelligence ChatGPT in educational ministry. Journal of Christian education in Korea, 78, 57-85.
  15. Yoo, J. W. (2023). Analysis of professors' experiences with generative AI and the concerns of classroom use. Korean Journal of General Education, 17(6), 333-350.
  16. Yoo, J. Y., Lee, S. I., Lee, S. K., Jeon, B. C. (2023). Educational ministry and media in the age of AI. Seoul: Coommi Books.
  17. Lee, Y. R. (2022). The effect of university students' learning activities on competency and major class satisfaction in blended learning. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(22), 985-1000.
  18. Lee, H. S., Yoo, J. W. (2024). Exploring college students' educational experiences and perceptions of generative AI: The case of A University. Journal of Korea Contents Academy, 24(1), 428-437.
  19. Jang, H. J., So, H. J. (2023). The analysis of research trends and topics about the educational use of ChatGPT. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 27(4), 387-401.
  20. Jeong, B. H. (2024). AI and Future Society. Seoul: Dongmoonsa.
  21. Cha, M. Y., Im, H. J. (2023). A study on university professors' perception on educational applicability of ChatGPT in English classes. Culture & Convergence, 45(5), 109-118.
  22. The Korean Society of Christian Religious Education (2023). Christian education of digital transformation era. Spring Conference Proceeding.
  23. Han, S. K., Lee, C. H., Ryo, M. Y., Kim, S. H., Hong, S. B., Kim, T, R., Ko, B. C. (2020). Good AI education guideline. Incheon Metropolitan Office of Education.
  24. Han, H. J. (2023b). A qualitative research on exploring consideration factors for educational use of Chat GPT. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 9(4), 659-666.
  25. Hong, J. O., Jeon, G. W. (2023). The potential use of ChatGPT in book review writing classes. Wiritng Research, 59, 7-35.