Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship (벤처창업연구)

The Korean Society of Business Venturing (한국벤처창업학회)
권호 표지

An Empirical Investigation of Social Entrepreneurial Orientation (SEO) and Entrepreneurial Bricolage: Their Impact on the Performance of Social Enterprises

사회적 기업가적 지향성(SEO)과 기업가적 브리콜라주: 사회적 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Sang-Young (Department of Business Administration, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Rha, June-Young (Department of Business Administration, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 김상영 (가톨릭대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 라준영 (가톨릭대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2024.09.10
  • Accepted : 2024.10.22
  • 발행 : 2024.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

초록

This study investigates the role of entrepreneurial bricolage as a pivotal entrepreneurial mindset for social enterprises facing challenges in resource mobilization. It empirically explores how bricolage acts as a mediating factor in the relationship between social entrepreneurial orientation (SEO) and the economic and social performance of social enterprises, building upon existing research that underscores the significance of SEO. To address this research objective, the study utilized structural equation modeling to analyze both the direct effects of SEO and bricolage on the economic and social performance of social enterprises, as well as the mediating role of bricolage in the relationship between SEO and these performances. The results indicate that SEO does not exert a significant impact on the economic performance of social enterprises but does have a direct effect on enhancing social performance. Furthermore, SEO influences bricolage, which, in turn, positively affects both economic and social performance. Additionally, the economic performance of social enterprises was found to positively impact their social performance. This paper elucidates the specific pathways and mechanisms through which SEO influences social enterprise performance via bricolage and demonstrates that the application of bricolage in resource mobilization activities effectively improves both the economic and social performance of social enterprises.

본 논문은 자원 동원이 여의치 않은 사회적기업에게 새롭게 필요한 기업가정신인 기업가적 브리콜라주의 역할을 탐구한다. 기존 연구에서 중시하던 사회적 기업가적 지향성(SEO)과 사회적 기업의 경제적 성과 및 사회적 성과 간의 관계에 브리콜라주를 매개변수로 통합하여 실증적으로 분석한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 구조방정식모형을 활용하여 SEO와 브리콜라주가 사회적 기업의 경제적 및 사회적 성과에 미치는 직접적인 영향을 평가하고, SEO가 사회적 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향을 매개하는 브리콜라주의 역할을 분석하였다. 연구 결과 SEO는 사회적 기업의 경제적 성과에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않으나, 사회적 성과의 향상에는 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, SEO는 브리콜라주에 영향을 미치며, 브리콜라주는 다시 사회적 기업의 경제적 성과와 사회적 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다. 아울러 사회적 기업의 경제적 성과는 사회적 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문은 SEO가 브리콜라주를 통해 사회적 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향의 구체적인 경로와 메커니즘을 밝혔으며, 브리콜라주를 활용한 자원 동원 활동이 사회적 기업의 경제적 성과와 사회적 성과를 동시에 향상시키고 있음을 확인하였다.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 사회적가치연구원(CSES)의 'SPC 참여기업 서베이'의 지원에 의해 이루어졌음.

참고문헌

  1. 강문실.김윤숙(2016). 사회적 기업가 정신과 조직성과간의 조직몰입 조절효과. 상업교육연구, 30(3), 307-329.
  2. 김현미.홍정화(2011). 장애인 고용중심 기업의 기업가 특성과 종업원 역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 상업교육연구, 25(4), 91-116.
  3. 김형민(2022). 사회적 기업가정신이 시장. 기술지향성과 경제적 성과를 매개로 사회적 성과에 미치는 영향 관계. 사회적가치와기업연구, 15(2), 135-168.
  4. 라준영(2013). 사회적 기업의 기업가정신과 가치혁신. 한국협동조합연구, 31(3), 49-71.
  5. 박보연.조윤직(2022). 사회적기업 성과의 결정요인에 관한 연구: 조직자원과 사회적기업가정신을 중심으로. 한국조직학회보, 18(4), 161-196.
  6. 유한나.정의범(2022). 사회적 기업가정신과 혼합가치 지향성이 사회적 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향. 벤처창업연구, 17(1), 213-227.
  7. 윤현중(2014). 기업가적 지향성의 성과 효과 재검토: 중소 벤처기업을 대상으로. 벤처창업연구, 9(5), 103-114.
  8. 이석환.김성수(2024). 사회적기업의 사회적 성과와 경제적 성과의 관계: 탄자니아 사회적기업을 대상으로. 한국공공관리학보, 38(1), 27-49.
  9. 이용탁(2011). 사회적 기업가정신과 성과와의 관련성에 관한 연구. 인적자원관리연구, 18(3), 129-150.
  10. 이진민.이상식(2017). 사회적기업의 성과와 지속가능성의 성공요인에 관한 연구. 한국산업정보학회논문지, 22(2), 123-142.
  11. 장성희(2014). 기업가지향성, 시장지향성, 기업의 사회적 책임이 사회적 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 14(6), 355-366.
  12. 장성희.이경탁(2017). 사회적 기업가정신이 사회적 자본과 기업성과에 미치는 영향. 한국창업학회지, 12(2), 256-277.
  13. 장영란.홍정화.차진화(2012). 사회적기업의 성과 및 지속가능성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구. 회계정보연구, 30(2), 175-207.
  14. 장용석(2018). 사회적 가치의 재구성: 대한민국 사회문제 지도로 사회적 기업의 미래를 그리다. [KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서 DB.
  15. 중소벤처기업부(2023). 2021년 기준 사회적벤처(소셜벤처) 실태조사 결과발표. Retireved 2023.03.01. from https://www.mss.go.kr/site/smba/ex/bbs/View.do?cbIdx=86&bcIdx=1039834&parentSeq=1039834
  16. 최무현.고은주(2019). 사회적기업가정신이 사회적.경제적 성과에 미치는 영향: 지역자산활용도 매개효과를 중심으로. 현대사회와 행정, 29(2), 37-61.
  17. 추양현.류동우(2023). 사회적 기업가정신과 시장지향성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 사회적 자본의 조절효과를 중심으로. 경영연구, 38(1), 99-114.
  18. 한국사회적기업진흥원(2024). 사회적기업조회. Retrieved 2024.09.01. from https://www.seis.or.kr/home/sub.do?menukey=7127
  19. Alarifi, G., & Alrubaishi, D.(2018). The social entrepreneurship landscape in Saudi Arabia.. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 24(4), 1-8.
  20. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W.(1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  21. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J.(2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?., Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22.
  22. Bacq, S., Ofstein, L. F., Kickul, J. R., & Gundry, L. K.(2015). Bricolage in social entrepreneurship: How creative resource mobilization fosters greater social impact. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(4), 283-289.
  23. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E.(2005). 'Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage.' Administrative Acience Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
  24. Baker, T., Pollock, T. G., & Sapienza, H. J.(2013). Winning an unfair game: How a resource-constrained player uses bricolage to maneuver for advantage in a highly institutionalized field. In Entrepreneurial resourcefulness: Competing with constraints(pp. 1-41). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  25. Battilana, J., Obloj, T., Pache, A. C., & Sengul, M.(2022). Beyond shareholder value maximization: Accounting for financial/social trade-offs in dual-purpose companies. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 237-258.
  26. Borza, A., Nistor, R., Mitra, C., & Bordean, O.(2009). Social enterprise and competitiveness. Management & Marketing, 4(3).
  27. Chang, H. J., Lin, S. J., Murray, L. W., Efendioglu, A. M., Khoshbakht, H., & Salteh, H. M.(2011). Entrepreneurial intensity in catering industry: A case study on Wang Group in Taiwan. Business and Management Review, 1(9), 1-12.
  28. Chinyoka, S. V.(2017). Bricolage: a state of entrepreneurial excellence. Asian Business Research, 2(3), 46.
  29. Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T.(2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855-872.
  30. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P.(1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic management journal, 10(1), 75-87.
  31. Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J.(2019). Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 43(1), 3-18.
  32. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M.(2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37-57.
  33. Dees, J. G.(1998). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Kauffman Foundation and Stanford University.
  34. Desa, G.(2012). Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 727-751.
  35. Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P.(2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703.
  36. do Adro, F., Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., & Kraus, S.(2021). Social entrepreneurship orientation and performance in non-profit organizations. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(4), 1591-1618.
  37. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F.(2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417-436.
  38. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F.(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  39. Frishammar, J., & Ake Horte, S.(2007). The role of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation for new product development performance in manufacturing firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(6), 765-788.
  40. Gali, N., Niemand, T., Shaw, E., Hughes, M., Kraus, S., & Brem, A.(2020). Social entrepreneurship orientation and company success: The mediating role of social performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120230.
  41. Garud, R., & Karnoe, P.(2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300.
  42. Griffiths, M. D., Gundry, L. K., & Kickul, J. R.(2013), The socio-political, economic, and cultural determinants of social entrepreneurship activity: An empirical examination", Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(2), 341-357.
  43. Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P.(2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 743-784.
  44. Hooi, H. C., Ahmad, N. H., Amran, A., & Rahman, S. A.(2016). The functional role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage in ensuring sustainable entrepreneurship. Management Research Review, 39(12), 1616-1638.
  45. Hough, J. & Scheepers, R.(2008), Creating corporate entrepreneurship through strategic leadership, Journal of Global Strategic & Management, 3, 17-25
  46. Hu, Y., & Pang, X.(2013). Social Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Nonprofit Organizations: An Empirical Study in China. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(19), 3989.
  47. Janssen, F., Fayolle, A., & Wuillaume, A.(2018). Researching bricolage in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3-4), 450-470.
  48. Kraus, S., Filser, M., O'Dwyer, M. & Shaw, E.(2013). Social Entrepreneurship: An exploratory citation analysis. Review of Managerial Science, Vol. No., pp.1-18.
  49. Kraus, S., Niemand, T., Halberstadt, J., Shaw, E., & Syrja, P.(2017). Social entrepreneurship orientation: development of a measurement scale. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(6), 977-997.
  50. Lages, C., Lages, C. R., & Lages, L. G.(2005). The RELQUAL scale: a measure of relationship quality in export market ventures. Journal of Business Research, 58(8), 1040-1048.
  51. Leadbeater, C.(1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. Demos.
  52. Demos. Levi-Strauss, C.(1967). The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  53. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G.(1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance., Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172.
  54. Lurtz, K., & Kreutzer, K.(2017). Entrepreneurial orientation and social venture creation in nonprofit organizations: The pivotal role of social risk taking and collaboration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 92-115.
  55. Meyskens, M., Robb-Post, C., Stamp, J. A., Carsrud, A. L., & Reynolds, P. D.(2010). Social ventures from a resource-based perspective: An exploratory study assessing global Ashoka fellows. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 661-680.
  56. Miles, M. P., Verreynne, M. L., Luke, B., Eversole, R., & Barraket, J.(2013). The relationship of entrepreneurial orientation, vincentian values and economic and social performance in social enterprise. Review of Business, 33(2), 91-102.
  57. Miller, D.(1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-792.
  58. Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J.(2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616-640.
  59. Mohammadi, S.(2021). The relationship between individual entrepreneurial orientation(IEO) and entrepreneurial bricolage: exploring passion and perseverance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 75-86.
  60. Morris, M. H., Webb, J. W. and Franklin, R. J.(2011). Understanding the manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the nonprofit context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 947-971.
  61. Noor, M., Shah, F. A., & Kakakhel, S. J.(2020). Unfolding Bricolage in Social Entrepreneurship: A Way Forward for Future Research. International Review of Management and Business Research, 9(4), 44-55.
  62. Pinheiro, P., Daniel, A., & Moreira, A.(2021). Social enterprise performance: the role of market and social entrepreneurship orientations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(1), 45-60.
  63. Poornima, A., & Rajini, G.(2021). Bricolage as an Intervention to Resource Constraints in Social Entrepreneurship-A Systematic Literature Review. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(7), 698-709.
  64. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. R.(2011). Creating shared value (Vol. 17). Boston, MA, USA: FSG.
  65. Sakarya, S., Bodur, M., Yildirim-Oktem, O., & Selekler-Goksen, N.(2012). Social alliances: Business and social enterprise collaboration for social transformation. Journal of business research, 65(12), 1710-1720.
  66. Salahat, M. A., & Ta'amreh, R.(2023). The Connective Power of Entrepreneurial Bricolage in NGOs: Unveiling its Mediating Influence on Social Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainability. Journal of Knowledge Management Application and Practice, 5(1), 15-26.
  67. Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P.(2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource- constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230.
  68. Sulphey, M. M., & Salim, A.(2020). Development of a tool to measure social entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(2), 231-253.
  69. Tasavori, M., Zaefarian, R., & Eng, T. Y.(2018). Internal social capital and international firm performance in emerging market family firms: The mediating role of participative governance. International Small Business Journal, 36(8), 887-910.
  70. Voltan, A.(2019). On the importance of being scrappy: entrepreneurial orientation and bricolage in social enterprises, Doctorial Thesis, Department of Business Administration, Saint Mary's University.
  71. Wales, W. J., Gupta, V. K., & Mousa, F. T.(2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 357-383.
  72. Weerawardena, J., & Dwivedi, A.(2018). Conceptualizing and operationalizing the social entrepreneurship construct. Journal of Business Research, 86, 32-40.
  73. Weerawardena, M. & Mort, G. S.(2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35.
  74. Winkel, D., Vanevenhoven, J., Yu, A., & Bronson, J.(2013). The invisible hand in entrepreneurial process: bricolage in emerging economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 17(4-6), 214-223.
  75. Yu, X., Li, Y., Chen, D. Q., Meng, X., & Tao, X.(2019). Entrepreneurial bricolage and online store performance in emerging economies. Electronic Markets, 29, 167-185.
  76. Zafar, Z., Wenyuan, L., Bait Ali Sulaiman, M. A., Siddiqui, K. A., & Qalati, S. A.(2022). Social entrepreneurship orientation and Enterprise fortune: an intermediary role of social performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 755080.