동서간호학연구지 (Journal of East-West Nursing Research)

  • 제30권2호
  • /
  • Pages.99-107
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1226-4938(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-8448(eISSN)
경희대학교 동서간호학연구소 (East-west Nursing Research Institute, Kyung Hee University)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국어판 대상자중심재활 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도

Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of the Client-centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire

  • 투고 : 2024.08.08
  • 심사 : 2024.10.02
  • 발행 : 2024.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Client-Centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire (CCRQ). Methods: The English version of the CCRQ was translated into Korean using the forward and backward translation method. Data were collected from 243 post-stroke rehabilitation patients at six rehabilitation hospitals in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. Validity was assessed, including construct validity, convergent validity, and criterion validity. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: The Korean version of the CCRQ consists of 15 items in three domains: decision-making/communication, self-management/empowerment, and psychosocial well-being. Construct validity was verified using a three-factor structure, and the scale showed good convergent validity. Criterion validity was evaluated using the Korean version of the Person-centered Climate Questionnaire, which showed a significant correlation. Additionally, the reliability of the scale was good. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the Korean version of the CCRQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the extent of person-centered rehabilitation care in individuals undergoing stroke rehabilitation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yun DW, Choi JS. Person-centered rehabilitation care and outcomes: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2019;93:74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.012
  2. Edvardsson D, Winblad B, Sandman PO. Person-centered care of people with severe Alzheimer's disease: Current status and ways forward. The Lancet Neurology. 2008;7(4):362-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70063-2
  3. Jesus T, Papadimitriou C, Bright F, Kayes N, Pinho C, Cott C. Person-centered rehabilitation model: Framing the concept and practice of personcentered adult physical rehabilitation based on a scoping review and thematic analysis of the literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2022;103(1):106-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.005
  4. Cheng L, Leon V, Liang A, Reiher C, Roberts D, Feldthusen C, et al. Patient-centered care in physical therapy: Definition, operationalization and outcome measures. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2016;21(2):109-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2016.1228558
  5. Morgan S, Yoder LA. Concept analysis of person-centered care. Journal of Holistic Nursing. 2012;30(1):6-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010111412189
  6. Bamm EL, Rosenbaum P, Wilkins S, Stratford P, Mahlberg N. Exploring client-centered care experiences in in-patient rehabilitation settings. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2015;2:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615582036
  7. Preston K. Rehabilitation nursing: A client-centered philosophy. American Journal of Nursing. 1994;94(2):66-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3464526
  8. Kim DY, Kim YH, Lee J, Chang WH, Kim M, Pyun S, et al. Clinical practice guideline for stroke rehabilitation in Korea 2016. Brain and Neurorehabilitation. 2017;10(Suppl1):e11. https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2017.10.e11
  9. Kang E, Kim MY, Lipsey KL, Foster ER. Person-centered goal setting: A systematic review of intervention components and level of active engagement in rehabilitation goal-setting interventions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2022;103(1):121-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.025
  10. Rose A, Rosewilliam S, Soundy A. Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2017;100(1):65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.030
  11. Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H, Valimaki M. Development and psychometric properties of the individualized care scale. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2005:11(1):7-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00481.x
  12. Edvardsson D, Sandman PO, Rasmussen B. Swedish language person-centered climate questionnaire-patient version: Construction and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;63(3):302-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04709.x
  13. Cott CA, Teare G, McGilton KS, Lineker S. Reliability and construct validity of the client-centered rehabilitation questionnaire. Disability Rehabilitation, 2006;28(22):1387-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600638398
  14. Korner M, Dangel H, Plewnia A, Haller J, Wirtz MA. Psychometric evaluation of the client-centered rehabilitation questionnaire (CCRQ) in a large sample of German rehabilitation patients. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2017;31(7):926-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516665158
  15. Roh GS. The proper methods of statistical analysis for dissertation: SPSS & AMOS. Rev. ed. Seoul: Hanbit Academy Inc; 2019. p. 459.
  16. Lee EH, Ko E. Comparison with importance and performance in rehabilitation nursing needs perceived by stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation hospital and nurses. The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing. 2016;19(1):30-42. https://doi.org/10.7587/kjrehn.2016.30.
  17. Yoon JY, Kim DE, Bae S, Edvardsson D, Chang SJ. Reliability and validity of the Korean person-centered climate questionnaire-resident version. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing. 2018;20(1):10-21. https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2018.20.1.10
  18. Chapman DW, Carter JF. Translation procedures for the cross cultural use of measurement instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1979;1(3):71-6. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737001003071
  19. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health. 2007;30(4):459-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  20. Bae BR. Structural equation modeling with Amos 24. Seoul: Cheongram; 2017. pp. 1-506.
  21. Kane RL. Understanding health care outcomes research. 2nd ed. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2006. p. 404.
  22. Kim OW. Caregiver's burden and educational needs of acute stroke patient [master's thesis]. Deajeon: Eulji University; 2009. pp. 1-46.
  23. Geldhof GJ, Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ. Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods. 2014; 19(1):72-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
  24. Lee EO, Lim NY, Park HA, Lee IS, Kim JI, Bae J, et al. Nursing Research and Statistics. Paju: Soomoonsa; 2009. pp. 1-789.
  25. Eyssen ICJM, Steultjens MPM, de Groot V, Steultjens EMJ, Knol DL, Polman CH, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of client-centred occupational therapy in multiple sclerosis: Good process, poor outcome. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2013;35(19):1636-46. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.748845
  26. Korner M. Patient-centered care through internal and external participation in medical rehabilitation. Health. 2013;5:48-55. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2013.56A2008
  27. Lee EH, Kim CJ, Kim EJ, Chae HJ, Cho SY. Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires published in Korean nursing journals. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(1):50-8. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.1.50
  28. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education; 2007. pp. 504-512.