DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Classification of Vulnerable Areas to PM2.5 according to Urban Characteristics based on Vulnerability Assessment

취약성 평가에 기반한 PM2.5 취약지역 유형화에 관한 연구

  • Hansol Mun (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Juchul Jung (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • 문한솔 (부산대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 정주철 (부산대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2024.08.13
  • Accepted : 2024.10.10
  • Published : 2024.10.31

Abstract

PM2.5, a type of fine particulate matter, poses serious health risks. Existing pollution management policies and research have generally focused on high-concentration areas. However, this approach has limitations as it does not adequately account for regional characteristics and varying levels of vulnerability, leading to an incomplete reflection of actual risks in specific areas. This study analyzed 229 administrative districts to develop a vulnerability index by comprehensively evaluating PM2.5 exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Using data from 2019, the index was calculated through normalization and entropy weighting methods, and spatial patterns of PM2.5 vulnerability were examined through LISA and K-means clustering analysis. The findings reveal that the distribution of PM2.5-vulnerable areas shows distinct patterns within urban settings, which were classified into four distinct types, each characterized by different urban features. This suggests a need for region-specific dust reduction policies. This study contributes to a better understanding of the spatial patterns of PM2.5 vulnerability and aims to support the development of more effective policy approaches.

PM2.5는 건강에 심각한 영향을 미치는 미세먼지로, 기존의 오염 관리 정책 및 연구는 주로 고농도 지역에 기반하여 진행되어 왔다. 그러나 이러한 접근법은 지역별 특성과 취약성 수준을 충분히 고려하지 못해, 특정 지역의 실제 위험을 제대로 반영하지 못하는 한계가 있다. 본 연구는 229개 행정구역을 대상으로 PM2.5 노출, 민감도, 그리고 적응 능력을 종합적으로 분석하여 취약성 지수를 도출하였다. 2019년 기준의 데이터를 활용하여 정규화와 엔트로피 가중치 방법을 통해 지수를 산출하였고, LISA 분석과 K-means 군집 분석을 통해 PM2.5 취약 지역의 공간적 패턴을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, PM2.5 취약 지역의 분포는 도시 내 특정 패턴을 보이며, 취약 지역은 네 가지 유형으로 분류되었다. 각 유형은 서로 다른 도시적 특성을 가지며, 이를 통해 지역별 맞춤형 미세먼지 저감 정책의 필요성을 제시하였다. 본 연구는 PM2.5 취약성의 공간적 패턴을 이해하고, 보다 효과적인 정책 접근 방안을 모색하는 데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 과제는 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Baeck SH, Choi SJ, Hong SJ, Kim DP. 2011. A study on comparison of normalization and weighting method for constructing index about flood. Journal of Wetlands Research, 13(3): 411-426. [Korean Literature]
  2. Choi YS, Kim JW, Lim U. 2018. An analysis on the spatial patterns of heat wave vulnerable areas and adaptive capacity vulnerable areas in Seoul. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 53(7): 87-107. [Korean Literature]
  3. Eum JI, Kim HK. 2020. The impacts of industrial characteristics of cities on fine dust levels. Journal of Environmental Science International, 29(5): 445-455. [Korean Literature]
  4. Ha SJ, Nam KC, Min SH, Jun SJ, Park JS. 2014. A study on the examination and application of the regional resilience for sustainable development. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  5. Harrison RM, Laxen D, Moorcroft S, Laxen K. 2012. Processes affecting concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the UK atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 46: 115-124.
  6. Hu Z, Rao KR. 2009. Particulate air pollution and chronic ischemic heart disease in the eastern United States: A county level ecological study using satellite aerosol data. Environmental Health, 8(1): 1-10.
  7. IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Third Assessment Report. McCarthy et al. (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  8. Jang AS. 2014. Impact of particulate matter on health. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 57(9): 763-768. [Korean Literature]
  9. Jeong JC. 2014. A spatial distribution analysis and time series change of PM10 in Seoul City. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 17(1): 61-69. [Korean Literature]
  10. Jeong JC, Lee SH. 2018. Spatial distribution of particulate matters in comparison with land-use and traffic volume in Seoul, Republic of Korea. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX, 48(1): 123-138. [Korean Literature]
  11. Ju SH, No JH, Kim CS, Heo J. 2017. Local spatial autocorrelation analysis of 3 disease prevalence: A case study of Korea. Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics, 42(4): 301-308. [Korean Literature]
  12. Jung JH, Kwon OY. 2015. Statistical model analysis of urban spatial structures and greenhouse gas (GHG) - air pollution (AP) integrated emissions in Seoul. Journal of Environmental Science International, 24(3): 303-316. [Korean Literature]
  13. Jun SM, Park HJ, Yeom JW, Kim JH, Jung JC. 2020. Analysis of livability in coastal areas. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, 28(2): 21-48. [Korean Literature]
  14. Kim DH, Lim U. 2010. An empirical analysis of spatial concentration of producer services in Seoul. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 45(5): 217-227. [Korean Literature]
  15. Kim HJ, Jun MJ. 2014. Analysis on relationship between urban development characteristics and air pollution level - A case of Seoul Metropolitan Region. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 49(7): 151-167. [Korean Literature]
  16. Kim KW, Park BC, Heo JB, Kang JY, Lee IJ. 2020. Assessment of heat wave vulnerability in Busan using the IPCC climate change vulnerability assessment framework. The Korea Spatial Planning Review; 23-38. [Korean Literature]
  17. Kodinariya TM, Makwana PR. 2013. Review on determining number of cluster in K-means clustering. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(6): 90-95.
  18. Lee SH, Kang JE, Bae HJ, Yoon DK. 2015. Vulnerability assessment of the air pollution using entropy weights: Focused on ozone. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 21(4): 751-763. [Korean Literature]
  19. Lee YS, Sohn DW. 2015. An analysis of the relationships between the characteristics of urban physical environment and air pollution in Seoul. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea, 16(3): 5-19. [Korean Literature]
  20. Moss RH, Brenkert EL, Malone AL. 2001. Vulnerability to climate change: A quantitative approach. Prepared for the US Department of Energy.
  21. Nam KP, Kim CH. 2013. Study on Sensitivity of different Standardization Methods to Climate Change Vulnerability Index. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 22(6): 677-693. [Korean Literature]
  22. Oh HS, Lee SH, Choi DW, Kwak KH. 2020. Comparison of the vertical PM2.5 distributions according to atmosphere stability using a drone during open burning events. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 36(1): 108-118. [Korean Literature]
  23. Ristovski ZD, Miljevic B, Surawski NC, Morawska L, Fong KM, Goh F, Yang IA. 2012. Respiratory health effects of diesel particulate matter. Respirology, 17(2): 201-212.
  24. Seok Y, Ji E, Lee J. 2024. How to manage urban disturbances: Focused on social-ecological vulnerability to fine dust pollution. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 104; 107317.
  25. Sin YE, Park JS, Kim SY, Lee SW, An KJ. 2021. A study on green space location selection to reduce particulate matter by projecting distributions of emission source and vulnerable groups - focusing on Seongdong-gu, Seoul. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 24(1): 53-68. [Korean Literature]
  26. Thorndike RL. 1953. Who belongs in the family? Psychometrika, 18(4): 267-276.
  27. Yeom JW, Kang SW, Jung PS, Jung JC. 2020. Spatial scope of the regional hazard mitigation plan. Journal of Korean Society Hazard Mitigation, 20(1): 61-70. [Korean Literature]
  28. Yoo HJ, Kim JK, Shin JW, Kim YJ, Min SE, Jegal DS, Bang KI, Lee SM. 2017. Health vulnerability assessment for PM10 due to climate change in Incheon. Journal of Environmental Health Sciences, 43(3): 240-246. [Korean Literature]