DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Performance Assessment of Science Inquiry Experiments in High School Based on the 2015 Revised Curriculum

2015개정 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 과학탐구실험 수행평가 분석

  • Hyeongtak Yun (Pusan National University) ;
  • Jihun Park (Gyeongin National University of Education) ;
  • Dojun Jung (Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeonghee Nam (Pusan National University)
  • 윤형탁 (부산대학교) ;
  • 박지훈 (경인교육대학교) ;
  • 정도준 (부산대학교) ;
  • 남정희 (부산대학교)
  • Received : 2024.07.18
  • Accepted : 2024.09.29
  • Published : 2024.10.31

Abstract

This study aimed to ascertain whether the assessment of scientific inquiry skill in high school curricula aligns with the achievement standards outlined in the science education curriculum. It analyzed the skill identified in the performance assessment standards and those manifested in the performance assessment tasks, focusing on 411 high school science investigation experiment tasks. The results showed that the skill in achievement standards of performance assessment and tasks were biased toward certain skill, and the content validity of the assessment of skill was found to be low. The performance assessment in science inquiry experiments is conducted without adequately considering science inquiry skill, and there is a lack of consistency in teachers' assessment planning and execution. The study found that the preference for specific assessment methods affected the bias in skill covered by performance assessment tasks. This study suggests the need for diversifying the skill in teaching, learning, and assessment to cultivate the core competencies proposed in the curriculum, and it explores ways to improve skill assessment.

이 연구는 고등학교 교육과정에서 과학탐구기능에 대한 평가가 과학교육과정에서 제시한 성취기준에 부합하여 계획되고 실제 이루어지고 있는지 알아보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 고등학교 과학탐구실험 수행평가 과제 411개를 대상으로 수행평가 성취기준에서 나타난 기능과 수행평가 과제에서 나타난 기능을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 수행평가 성취기준 및 과제에서 나타난 기능은 특정 기능에 편중되어 있었고, 기능의 평가에 대한 내용 타당도는 낮게 나타났다. 과학탐구실험에서 이루어지는 수행평가가 과학탐구기능을 고려하지 않고 평가하고 있으며, 교사의 평가 계획 및 실행에 대한 일관성 부족을 보이고, 특정 평가 방법의 선호가 수행평가 과제에서 다루는 기능의 편중에 영향을 준 것으로 분석된다. 이를 통해 교육과정에서 제시하는 핵심역량을 기르기 위해서 교수⋅학습 및 평가에서 다루는 기능이 다양화될 필요성과 기능 평가의 개선 방안에 대해 제언하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 과학기술정보통신부 및 정보통신기획평가원의 대학ICT연구센터지원사업의 연구결과로 수행되었음(IITP-2021-2018-0-01433).

References

  1. Baek, J. H., Byun, T. J., Lee, D. W., & Shim, H. P. (2020). An investigation on the assessment tool and status of assessment in the 'scientific inquiry experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 515-529.
  2. Baek, S. G. (1998). The significance and methods of assessment in performance assessment. Special Education Journal, 5(3), 18-31.
  3. Byun, T. J., Baek, J. H., Shim, H. P., & Lee, D. W. (2019). An investigation on the implementation of the 'Scientific Inquiry Experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 669-679.
  4. Cho, J. I., Yoo, H. B., & Rho, Y. J. (2000). Development and application of performance assessment materials for a biology unit of middle school science 1. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 384-395.
  5. Choi, H. J. (2013). Development of science item on the computer-based performance assessment: a experiment on constructing circuits with an ammeter and a voltmeter. Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 348-358.
  6. Hong, J. L., & Choi, E. K. (2002). A study on secondary students' perceptions and self - efficacy of the performance assessments in the science subject. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(2), 230-239.
  7. Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. Y. (2002). Analysis on the status of performance assessment in science based on the elementary teachers' concerns. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 227-239.
  8. Jeong, E. Y., & Choi W. H. (2014). A survey on evaluation in science education at primary and secondary school in korea. Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 168-181.
  9. KICE (2015). Developmental research on the interpretation of the 2015 revised curriculum general principles-middle and high school. CRC 2015-28. Korea Institutue for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  10. Kim, E. J., Park, H. J., Kang, H. K., & Noh, S. G. (2003). Developing of a criterion for selecting and producing of performance assessments in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(1), 75-85.
  11. Kim, E. K., Lee, Y. S., Gham, K. W., & Cha, J. H. (2021). A comparative analysis of 'function' and 'achievement standard' presented in the 2015 revised middle school common curriculum and home economics curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 33(1), 17-35.
  12. Kim, G. J., Gwak, S. H., Baek, N. J., Song, H. H., On, J. D., Lee, S. M., Han, H. J., Heo, B. H., Hong, E. S., Park, N. J., Lee, S. S., Park, H. G., Cheon, H. J., Kim, D. H., Hong, W. P., & Hwang, G. H. (2015). Study for the development of the 2015 revised curriculum outline [Final Draft], Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  13. Kim, H. J. (2021). Understanding and interpretation of the experience on the alignment with curriculum-instruction-evaluation-records of middle school teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Pusan University, Pusan, Korea.
  14. Kim, J. W., Kim, D. J., Son, Y. J., & Song, S. M. (2020). An analysis of skills for election education in social studies textbooks. Social Studies Education, 59(3), 169-189.
  15. Kim, M. H., Kim, S. H., Noh, T. H., & Choi, S. Y. (2019). The influences of integrated science and science inquiry experiment developed under the 2015 revised national curriculum on students' interest in science, scientific attitude, views on science-technology-society relationship, and views on nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(6), 791-797.
  16. Kim, M. H., Park, D. H., & Noh, T. H. (2022). Science teachers' actual and preferred cases of assessment in 'scientific inquiries in history' of science inquiry experiment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 42(6), 597-610.
  17. Kim, S. J., Kim, S., & Ban, J. C. (2019). Analysis of appropriateness of performance assessment tasks and rubric presented in performance assessment plan. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 32(1), 131-153.
  18. Kim, S. W. (2007). A study on analysis and alternatives of performance assessment in high school science subject. Journal of Educational, 20(4), 53-73.
  19. Kim, S. W., & Hyun, M. S. (2005). The study on the recognition of science teachers about the general matters of performance assessment and the appropiate performance assessment methods in middle school science curriculum. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 9(2), 213-232.
  20. Kim, W. G., Eun, J. Y., & Park, I. O. (2005). A case study ion the teacher's practical knowledge in relation to execution of performance assessment in middle school social studies education. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 22(1), 329-366.
  21. Kim. J. H., & Choi, W. H. (2022). Analysis of 'function' of inquiry activity in chemistry I textbook of 2015 revised science curriculum. Journal of Field-based Lesson Studies, 3(2), 35-59.
  22. Ko, K. S., & Kim, Y. J. (2020). The perception of teachers and students on the effects of performance assessment in middle school science classes. Korean Journal of Contemporary Education, 32(2), 87-101.
  23. Ko, M. S., Kim, E. A., Heo, J. M., & Yang, I. H. (2013). Elementary school teachers' beliefs of inquiry and practice of science performance assessment. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 6(2), 124-135.
  24. KOFAC (2019). Study on the monitoring and implementation of the 2015 science national curriculum. BD19030006. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  25. Kwak, Y. S., & Shin, Y. J. (2021). Analysis of inquiry practice and skill represented in science general elective textbooks of the 2015 revised curriculum. Biology Education, 49(3), 380-390.
  26. Lee, H. Y. (2020). Exploring improvement of curriculum on analysis of the connectivity between competencies, skills and achievement standards in 2015 revised mathematics curriculum for elementary school. The Mathematical Education, 59(4), 357-371.
  27. Lee, J. K., Lee, C. Y., Park, C. K., Shin, S. Y., Jeon, Y. E., & Hong, H. G. (2018). Analysis of the 'integrated science' and 'science inquiry experiments' achievement standards of the 2015 revised science curriculum from the practices. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(14), 227-252.
  28. Lee, S. H. (2018). Analysis of inquiry activities in high school science inquiry experiment textbooks for the 2015 revised science curriculum. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, korea.
  29. MOE. (2015a). 2015 Revised national science curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [supplement 9] Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  30. MOE. (2015b). The general theory of the ele-mentary and secondary school curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [supplement 1] Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  31. MOE. (2017). Exposition on the 2015 revised national curriculum general guideline. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  32. MOLEG. (2021). Special act on information disclosure of educational institutions. Sejong: Korea Ministry of Government Legislation.
  33. Park, S. H., Lim, Y. N., Jeong, Y. M., Cho, Y., Kim, S. Y., Jeong, S., Kim, J. H., & Lim, H. Y. (2022). Measures to improve course-based assessment in middle school in the post-corona era. Seoul: Seoul Education Research & Information Institute.
  34. PEN. (2024). Guidelines for managing high school academic performance for the 2024 school year. Busan: Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education
  35. Shin, M. K., & Kwon, G. P. (2020). Exploring scientific inquiry activities and epistemology of the climate change units in integrated science textbooks. Jounral of Energy and Climate Change Education, 10(3), 169-180.
  36. Son, G. W., & Jeong, C. W. (2013). A study on the implementation of performance assessment and analysis of it's educational effect in secondary moral education. Journal of Ethics, 1(91), 217-259.
  37. Song, S. C., & Shim K. C. (2019). Analysis of inquiry activity presented in science inquiry-experiment textbooks for high school students. Biology Education, 47(3), 372-383.