Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effect of Personality Types of College Students on Information Use Behavior and Satisfaction for University Libraries: Focusing on Cultural Learning

대학생의 성격유형이 대학도서관 정보이용행태와 만족도에 미치는 영향 연구: 교양학습을 중심으로

  • Tae Hee Lee ;
  • Woo Kwon Chang
  • 이태희 (전남대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 장우권 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.08.15
  • Accepted : 2024.09.03
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate how information use behavior and satisfaction appear by personality type for liberal arts learning among college students, and to propose a customized information service plan that can help college students study in university libraries. To this end, a survey was conducted on 169 university students enrolled in C University. The analysis consisted of demographic characteristics, MBTI personality type, information use behavior, satisfaction, and university library service perception survey. Frequency analysis, cross-analysis, multinomial logistic regression, one-way ANOVA, and hierarchical regression analysis were performed on the collected data using the SPSS 29 statistical program. As a result of the study, first, significant results were found in 'preferred information sources', 'information source consideration factors', and 'information collection patterns' according to personality type. Second, there were statistically significant differences in satisfaction according to personality type in 'system utilization ability', 'data selection ability', and 'the degree of recognition of the usefulness of learning activities'. Third, in the relationship between preferred information sources and satisfaction based on personality types and information use behaviors, there appears to be an inverse relationship when the content includes various topics with a lack of academic depth or expertise. However, the preference for 'social media' is positively correlated with 'satisfaction with search results,' as it provides diverse perspectives and viewpoints in liberal education

이 연구의 목적은 대학생들을 대상으로 교양학습을 위해 성격유형별로 정보이용행태와 만족도가 어떻게 나타나고 있는지를 조사하여, 대학도서관에서 대학생의 학업에 도움을 줄 수 있는 이용자 맞춤형 정보서비스 방안을 제안하는데 있다. 이를 위해 C대학교에 재학 중인 대학생 169명을 대상으로 설문조사를 하였다. 분석은 인구통계학적 특성, MBTI 성격유형, 정보이용행태, 만족도, 대학도서관 서비스 인식조사로 이루어졌다. 수집된 데이터는 SPSS 29 통계프로그램을 사용하여 빈도분석, 교차분석, 다항 로지스틱 회귀분석, 일원배치 분산분석(ANOVA), 위계적 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구의 결과, 첫째, 성격유형에 따른 정보이용행태는 '선호정보원', '정보원 고려요소', '정보수집패턴'에서 유의한 결과가 나타났다. 둘째, 성격유형에 따른 만족도는 '시스템 활용 능력', '자료 선별 능력', '학습활동 유용성 인지 정도'에 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 셋째, 성격유형과 정보이용행태에 따른 만족도는 선호정보원과 만족도 간의 영향관계에서 다양한 주제 자료가 혼재되어 있고, 학문적인 심도나 전문성이 부족한 경우 반비례 관계인 것에 반해, '소셜미디어' 선호도는 '탐색결과 만족도'와 비례해 교양학습에 있어 다양한 시각과 관점을 제공해주어 정적 관계를 나타내는 것으로 보인다. 따라서 C대학교 대학생들은 교양학습을 위한 정보추구에서 성격유형에 따라 정보이용행태와 만족도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Kyungjae (2010). The analysis of the fifferences of information needs and usages among academic users in the field of science and technology. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(2), 157-176. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.2.157 
  2. Choi, Yoonhee (2017). The relationship among colleges students' learning style, lecture satisfaction, and academic achievement in the liberal arts education. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(4), 307-308. 
  3. Committee on Library and Information Policy (2023). The 4th Comprehensive Library Development Plan. Ministry of Cultural, Sports abd Tourism. 
  4. Hong, Jeongyeon (2019). The Effect of New Police Officers' MBTI Personality type, Education Satisfaction and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment. Doctoral dissertation, Gachon University.
  5. Hong, Seongyoun (2023). Analyzing critical influencing factors on the future of general education: Perspectives from faculty members in general education institution of a university. Journal of Liberal Arts and Sciences Education, 4(2), 37-75. http://doi.org/10.37998/LE.2023.4.2.2 
  6. Hwang, Gwanghyun (2004). The Relationship of MBTI Characteristic Yypes and Spirituality Types: With Catholic and Christian Police Officers as Subjects. Master's thesis, Catholic University. 
  7. Jang, Hyunjung & Kim, Myungae (2014). Temperament by MBTI personality types, learning styles and learning strategies in nursing students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(9), 400-410. http://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.09.400 
  8. Jeong, Dongyeol & Kim, Seongjin (2010). Theory and Laws of Library and Information Science. Seoul: Korean Library Association. 
  9. Jeong, Yeongmi (2012). Influences of Enneagram personality types on OPAC searching and satisfaction. Korea Society for Information Management, 29(3), 169-186. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.169 
  10. Jung, Jongwon & Ryu, Kiung (2015). Analysis of the current status and the relevant factors of liberal & general education in Korea higher education. The Korea Educational Review, 21(3), 5-27. 
  11. Kang, Boram (2019). Relationship between MBTI Personality Types and Focusing Manners: Focusing on College Students. Master's thesis, Duksung Women's University.
  12. Kang, Changdong (2012). An analysis of the present condition and character for cultured education in Korean universities. The Korea Educational Review, 18(2), 83-107. 
  13. Kang, Minjeoung (2014). An Study on the Relationship among MBTI Personality Types, Job Satisfaction, Customer Orientation and Turnover Intention. Master's thesis, Ulsan University.
  14. Kang, Moonsig & Jung, Youngjung (2008). A study on the effects of the quality factors of university information systems on students' satisfaction level. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems, 13(5), 197-213. 
  15. Kim, Ahyeon & Lee, Seungmin (2023). A study on the academic information seeking behavior of university students to improve subject guide: Focusing on C university. Korea Society for Information Management, 40(3), 55-76. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2023.40.3.055 
  16. Kim, Hangon (1993). The role and function of universities and communities: Focusing on social and cultural aspects. Journal of Yeungnam Regional Development, 14, 235-236. 
  17. Kim, Heesop (2004). Correlation between Web OPAC use patterns and MBTI personality types. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(4), 229-250. 
  18. Kim, Hyeyoung, Kim, Giyeong, Min, Yoonkyung, & Lee, Jeeyeon (2021). A study on information needs and behavior for the development of academic library services. Korea Society for Information Management, 38(2), 305-336. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.2.305 
  19. Kim, Hyunhee & Jang, Yoori (2014). The influence of enneagram personality styles on information seeking behaviors of undergraduate students of humanities and social sciences studies. Journal of the Korea Society for Library & Information, 48(3), 237-264. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.3.237 
  20. Kim, Jaeeun (2000). Searching Styles and Search Outcomes Difference among Searchers of Distinct Personality Types on Web-Based Educational Information Retrieval. Mater's thesis, Ewha Women University.
  21. Kim, Jeongtaek (2015). Characteristics of the 16 Personality Types. Seoul: Korea MBTI Research Institute. 
  22. Kim, Jeongtaek, Shim, Hyesook, & Jae, Seokbong (1995). MBTI Development and Utilization. Seoul: Korean Psychological Testing Institute. 
  23. Kim, Jinyoung (2012). A Study on the Realities for University Students to Make Use of Portal Sites' Academic Information. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  24. Kim, Jongcheol (2006). Types de personnalite de lyceens et leurs preferences des strategies d'apprentissage: une application de la grille de MBTI(Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) eclairee par celle de Keirsey. Societe Coreenne d'Enseignement de Langue et Litterature Francaises, 23, 53-80. 
  25. Kim, Jongryeon & Bae, Cheonwoong (2007). A study on the relationships between high school students' personality types and their preferences of learning strategies: focused on their MBTI personality types. Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 123-148. 
  26. Kim, Seunghan (2023, December 8). Naver, Kakao, SKT Share AI Technology to 'Promote Digital Information Access'. Money Today December 8, 2023. Available: https://news.mt.co.kr/mtview.php?no=2023120809204565382 
  27. Kim, Sungjin (2020). Analysis of usage behaviors for the electronic resources of undergraduates in a smart mobile environment: Focused on the usage statistics of the A-academic library. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(4), 53-82. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.4.053 
  28. Kim, Youjung (2017). A Study on Information Use Behavior of Graduate School of Education Students. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  29. Korean Basic Education Institute (2022). Standard Model for Liberal Arts Education at University. Available: https://www.konige.kr/data/general_edu.php[Retrieved March 5, 2023.] 
  30. Korean Educational Development Institute (2010). Study on the Learning Process of Korean College Students 1. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute. https://doi.org/10.23000/TRKO201400001937 
  31. Korean MBTI Psychology Research Institute [n.d.]. MBTI personality type. Available: https://kmbti.co.kr/character/index.html [Retrieved March 25, 2024.] 
  32. Korean MBTI Research Institute [n.d.]. Understanding MBTI. Available: https://www.mbti.co.kr [Retrieved March 2, 2024.] 
  33. Kwak, Woojung, Noh, Younghee, Ahn, Inja, & Zhang, Jingjing (2019). A study on the customized services of university libraries according to MBTI personality types of college students. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 30(4), 91-114. http://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.4.091 
  34. Kwon, Yongkeun (2011). An analysis of spiritual types in the light of C. G. Jung's theory of psychological types. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 0(26), 57-91. http://doi.org/10.17968/jcek.2011..26.002 
  35. Lee, Beomju (2003). A Study on the Patterns of Information Use of Engineering Students in Yonsei University. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  36. Lee, Eunju & Lee, Jaewhoan (2011). Meanings of library catalog in learning activities of Korean college students. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 105-126. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.49 
  37. Lee, Eunju (2013). Information Behavior of College Students and Meaning of Library Catalog. Doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University.
  38. Lee, Hynmin (2016). A study of development 4 ONs based interdisciplinary education model: Focused on arts classes in university general education. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16, 411-430. http://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.12.411 
  39. Lee, Jaewhoan (2009). Personal traits and information behavior: The case of college freshmen. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2), 161-182. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.2.200906.161 
  40. Lee, Lanju & Kim, Sujin (2015). A study on the literature review of information use behavior in specialized fields. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(2), 129-153. http://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.2.129 
  41. Lee, Seongheum & Yoon, Okhan (2013). Research on teaching behavior and teaching support measures for convergent education by course. Korean Society for Liberal Arts Education Conference Proceedings, 361-386. 
  42. Library and Information Science Dictionary Compilation Committee (2010). Dictionary of Library and Information Science Terms. Revision. Seoul: Korean Library Association. 
  43. Park, Haein (2023). A Study on School Library Services Based on Information-Seeking Behavior of Students in the Science School for Gifted. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  44. Seong, Myeon-seob (2020). A Study on the Information Use Behavior of Academic Researchers Using Archival Institutions. Master's thesis, Myongji University.
  45. Son, Donghyun (2006). Restructuring of the university's academic structure and the status of liberal arts education. 2006 Spring Symposium on University Education Council, 3-17. 
  46. Son, Hyunjeong (2015). Ways of Coping and Academic Resilience According to MBTI Personality Type of Nursing Students. Master's thesis, Catholic Kwandong University.
  47. Suh, Gabju (2016). An Exploratory Analysis of Academic Achievement Based on MBTI Personality Preference and U&I Learning Type. Master's thesis, Sogang University.
  48. Yim, Jinhee (2010). A Study on the Process of Public Information Seeking and Providing through Accountability Mechanism in Korea. Doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University.
  49. Zhao, Kexin (2017). A Study on the Use Motivation and Satisfaction among Academic Internet Portals. Master's thesis, Chungang University.
  50. Bates, M. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. Chapter 3. Information Behavior, 2381-2391. 
  51. Elihu, K. (1959). Mass Communication Research and the Study of Culture. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1-6. 
  52. Elliot, K. & Shin, D. (2010). Student Satisfaction: An Alternative Approach to Assessing This Important Concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518 
  53. Halder, S., Roy, A., & Chakraborty, P. K. (2010). The influence of personality traits on information-seeking behavior of students. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15, 41-53. 
  54. Heinstrom, J. (2005). Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving: The influence of personality and study approach on students' information-seeking behavior. Journal of Documentation, 61(2), 228-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510585205 
  55. Jung, C. G. (1979). Word and Image. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 
  56. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge University Press. 
  57. Paisley, W. J. (1968). Information Needs and Uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 3, 1-30. 
  58. Pamela, L. & Loren, T. (2003). Does an Individual's Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Preference Influence Task-Oriented Technology Use? IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 623-630. 
  59. Richard, L. O. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405 
  60. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Informs, 8(3), 240-253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240 
  61. Song, H. & Kwon, N. (2012). The Relationship between personality traits and Information competency in Korean and American students. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(7), 1153-1162. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.7.1153 
  62. Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in Information Beahviour Research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145