Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods

The Korean Statistical Society (한국통계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Classical and Bayesian inferences of stress-strength reliability model based on record data

  • Sara Moheb (Department of Mathematical Statistics) ;
  • Amal S. Hassan (Department of Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Graduate Studies for Statistical Research) ;
  • L.S. Diab (Department of Mathematical Statistics, Al-Azhar University)
  • Received : 2024.01.01
  • Accepted : 2024.06.27
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In reliability analysis, the probability P(Y < X) is significant because it denotes availability and dependability in a stress-strength model where Y and X are the stress and strength variables, respectively. In reliability theory, the inverse Lomax distribution is a well-established lifetime model, and the literature is developing inference techniques for its reliability attributes. In this article, we are interested in estimating the stress-strength reliability R = P(Y < X), where X and Y have an unknown common scale parameter and follow the inverse Lomax distribution. Using Bayesian and non-Bayesian approaches, we discuss this issue when both stress and strength are expressed in terms of lower record values. The parametric bootstrapping techniques of R are taken into consideration. The stress-strength reliability estimator is investigated using uniform and gamma priors with several loss functions. Based on the proposed loss functions, the reliability R is estimated using Bayesian analyses with Gibbs and Metropolis-Hasting samplers. Monte Carlo simulation studies and real-data-based examples are also performed to analyze the behavior of the proposed estimators. We analyze electrical insulating fluids, particularly those used in transformers, for data sets using the stress-strength model. In conclusion, as expected, the study's results showed that the mean squared error values decreased as the record number increased. In most cases, Bayesian estimates under the precautionary loss function are more suitable in terms of simulation conclusions than other specified loss functions.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the editor and referees for their meaningful suggestions and comments relating to the improvement of the paper.

References

  1. Aarset M (1987). How to identify a bathtub hazard rate, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-36, 106-108.
  2. Al-Omari AI, Hassan AS, Alotaibi N, Shrahili M, and Nagy HF (2021). Reliability estimation of inverse Lomax distribution using extreme ranked set sampling, Advances in Mathematical Physics, 2021, 1-12, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4599872
  3. Amin EA (2017). Estimation of stress-strength reliability for Kumaraswamy exponential distribution based on upper record values, International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, 12, 59-71, Available from: http://doi.org/10.12988/IJCMS.2017.7210
  4. Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N, and Nagaraja HN (1998). Records, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  5. Baklizi A (2008). Estimation of P(X < Y) exponential distributions, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 37, 692-698, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/03610920701501921
  6. Berger JO (1985). Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, Springer, New York, NY.
  7. Chandler KN (1952). The distribution and frequency of record values, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 14, 220-228.
  8. Chaturvedi A and Malhotra A (2020). On estimation of stress-strength reliability using lower record values from proportional reversed hazard family, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 39, 234-251.
  9. Condino F, Domma F, and Latorre G (2016). Likelihood and Bayesian estimation of P(Y < X) using lower record values from a proportional reversed hazard family, Statistical Papers, 59, 467-485, Available from: http://doi.org/0.1007/s00362-016-0772-9 1007/s00362-016-0772-9
  10. Dey S, Dey T, and Luckett DJ (2016). Statistical inference for the generalized inverted exponential distribution based on upper record values, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 120, 64-78.
  11. Dhanya M and Jeevavand E (2018). Stress-strength reliability of power function distribution based on records, Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 7, 39-48.
  12. Efron B (ed) (1987). The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
  13. Efron B and Tibshirani R (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York.
  14. Hassan AS, Abd-Allah M, and Nagy HF (2018a). Estimation of P(Y < X) using record values from the generalized inverted exponential distribution, Pakistan Journal of Statistics & Operation Research, 14, 645-660.
  15. Hassan AS, Abd-Allah M, and Nagy HF (2018b). Bayesian analysis of record statistics based on generalized inverted exponential model, International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8, 323-335, Available from: http://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.3506
  16. Hassan AS, Nagy HF, Muhammed HZ, and Saad MS (2020). Estimation of multicomponent stressstrength reliability followingWeibull distribution based on upper record values, Journal of Taibh University of Sciences, 14, 244-253, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2020.172175110.9734
  17. Hassan AS, Ismail DM, and Nagy HF (2022). Reliability Bayesian analysis in multicomponent stressstrength for generalized inverted exponential using upper record data, AENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 52, 1-13.
  18. Hassan AS, Almanjahie IM, Al-Omari AI, Alzoubi L, and Nagy HF (2023). Stress-strength modeling using median ranked set sampling: Estimation, simulation, and application, Mathematics, 11, 318, Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ math11020318
  19. Hassan AS, Elgarhy M, Chesneau C, and Nagy HF (2024a). Bayesian analysis of multi-component stress-strength reliability using improved record values, Journal of Autonomous Intelligence, 7, 1-20, Available from: doi: 10.32629/jai.v7i4.868
  20. Hassan AS, Elgarhy M, Chesneau C, and Nagy HF (2024b). On estimating multi-stress-strength reliability for inverted Kumaraswamy under ranked set sampling with application in engineering, Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 31(30), Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44198-024-00196-y
  21. Johnson RA (1998). 3 Stress-strength models for reliability, Elsevier, 7, 27-54.
  22. Khan MJS and Khatoon B (2020). Statistical inferences of R = P(X < Y) for exponential distribution based on generalized order statistics, Annals of Data Science, 7, 525-545, Available from http://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-019-00207-6
  23. Kleiber C and Kotz S (eds) (2003). Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
  24. Kleiber C (2004). Lorenz ordering of order statistics from log-logistic and related distributions, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 120, 1319.
  25. Kotz S, Lumelskii Y, and PenskyM(2003). The Stress-Strength Model and its Generalizations, World Scientific, 1-10.
  26. Krishnamoorthy K and Lin Y (2010). Confidence limits for stress-strength reliability involving Weibull models, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140, 1754-1764.
  27. Lawless JF (2003). Statistical Models and Methods for LifetimeData. 2nd edition, JohnWiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
  28. McKenzie D, Miller C, and Falk DA (2011). The Landscape Ecology of Fire, Springer, New York.
  29. Mohamed M (2022). Estimation of reliability function based on the upper record values for generalized gamma Lindley stress-strength model: Case study COVID-19, International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9, 92-99.
  30. Nelson W (1972). Graphical analysis of accelerated life test data with the inverse power law model, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1, 2-11.
  31. Norstrom J (1996). The use of precautionary loss functions in risk analysis, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 45, 400-403, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1109/24.536992
  32. Pak A, Raqab MZ, Mahmoudi MR, Mahmoudi MR, Band SS, and Mosavi A (2021). Estimation of stress-strength reliability R = P(X > Y) based on Weibull record data in the presence of inter-record times, AEJ - Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61, 2130-2144, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aje.2021.07.025
  33. Rahman J, Aslam M, and Ali S (2013). Estimation and prediction of inverse Lomax model via Bayesian approach, AEJ - Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2, 43-56.
  34. Rahman J and Aslam M (2014). Interval prediction of future order statistics in two-component mixture inverse Lomax model: A Bayesian approach, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 33, 216-227.
  35. Raqab M, Bdair O, and Al-Aboud F (2018). Inference for the two-parameter bathtub-shaped distribution based on record data, Metrika, 81, 229-253.
  36. Reyad HM and Othman SA (2018). E-Bayesian estimation of two-component mixture of inverse Lomax distribution based on type-I censoring scheme, Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science, 26, 1-22.
  37. Shao J and Tu D (1995). The Jackknife and Bootstrap, Springer, New York, NY.
  38. Singh S and Tripathi YM (2018). Estimating the parameters of an inverse Weibull distribution under progressive type-I interval censoring, Statistical Papers , 59, 21-56.
  39. Singh SK, Singh U, and Yadav AS (2016). Reliability estimation for inverse Lomax distribution under Type-II censored data using Markov chain Monte Carlo method, International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 17, 128-146.
  40. Sharma A and Kumar P (2021). Estimation of parameters of inverse Lomax distribution under Type-II censoring scheme, Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 10, 85-102.
  41. Tarvirdizade B and Kazemzadeh H (2016). Inference on P(X < Y) based on record values from the Burr Type X distribution, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 45, 267-278, Available from: http://doi.org/10.15672/HJMS.2015468581
  42. Tummala V and Sathe PT (1978). Minimum expected loss estimators of reliability and parameters of certain lifetime distributions, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-27, 283-285, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1109/TR.1978.5220373
  43. Yadav AS, Singh SK, and Singh U (2019). Bayesian estimation of R = P(Y < X) for inverse Lomax distribution under progressive Type-II censoring scheme, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 10, 905-917, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00820-x