Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (대한소아청소년정신의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implication of Social Rejection in Cognitive Bias Modification Interpretation Training in Adolescents With Eating Disorders

  • Youl-Ri Kim (Department of Psychiatry, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University) ;
  • Sohee Lee (Institute of Eating Disorders and Mental Health, Inje University) ;
  • Yeon-Sun Cho (Institute of Eating Disorders and Mental Health, Inje University)
  • Received : 2023.10.18
  • Accepted : 2024.01.02
  • Published : 2024.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Difficulties in interpersonal relationships intensify negative emotions and act as risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology in eating disorders. Rejection sensitivity refers to the tendency to react sensitively to a rejection. Patients with eating disorders experience difficulties in interpersonal relationships because of their high sensitivity to rejection. Cognitive bias modification interpretation (CBM-I) is a treatment developed to correct interpretation bias for social and emotional stimuli. In this review, we searched for research characteristics and trends through a systematic literature analysis of CBM-I for eating disorders. Methods: Five papers that met the selection and exclusion criteria were included in the final literature review and analyzed according to detailed topics (participant characteristics, design, and results). Results: The literature supports the efficacy of the CBM-I in reducing negative interpretation bias and eating disorder psychopathology in patients with eating disorders. CBM-I targets emotional dysregulation in adolescent patients with eating disorders and serves as an additional strengthening psychotherapy to alleviate eating disorder symptoms. Conclusion: The current findings highlight the potential of CBM-I as an individualized adjunctive treatment for adolescents with eating disorders and social functioning problems.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (The Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT); Grant No. 2021R1A2C2009668).

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association;2013.
  2. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Youth health behavior survey 2022 [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency;2023 [cited 2023 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.kdca.go.kr/yhs/.
  3. Cristea IA, Mogoase C, David D, Cuijpers P. Practitioner review: cognitive bias modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2015;56:723-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12383
  4. Arcelus J, Haslam M, Farrow C, Meyer C. The role of interpersonal functioning in the maintenance of eating psychopathology: a systematic review and testable model. Clin Psychol Rev 2013;33:156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.10.009
  5. Rieger E, Van Buren DJ, Bishop M, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Welch R, Wilfley DE. An eating disorder-specific model of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-ED): causal pathways and treatment implications. Clin Psychol Rev 2010;30:400-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.001
  6. Schmidt U, Treasure J. Anorexia nervosa: valued and visible. A cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model and its implications for research and practice. Br J Clin Psychol 2006;45(Pt 3):343-366. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X53902
  7. Treasure J, Corfield F, Cardi V. A three-phase model of the social emotional functioning in eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2012;20:431-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2181
  8. Downey G, Feldman SI. Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996;70:1327-1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
  9. De Paoli T, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Halliwell E, Puccio F, Krug I. Social rank and rejection sensitivity as mediators of the relationship between insecure attachment and disordered eating. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2017;25:469-478. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2537
  10. Raykos BC, McEvoy PM, Fursland A. Socializing problems and low self-esteem enhance interpersonal models of eating disorders: evidence from a clinical sample. Int J Eat Disord 2017;50:1075-1083. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22740
  11. Cardi V, Di Matteo R, Corfield F, Treasure J. Social reward and rejection sensitivity in eating disorders: an investigation of attentional bias and early experiences. World J Biol Psychiatry 2013;14:622-633. https://doi.org/10.3109/15622975.2012.665479
  12. Rowlands K, Grafton B, Cerea S, Simic M, Hirsch C, Cruwys T, et al. A multifaceted study of interpersonal functioning and cognitive biases towards social stimuli in adolescents with eating disorders and healthy controls. J Affect Disord 2021;295:397-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.013
  13. Turton R, Cardi V, Treasure J, Hirsch CR. Modifying a negative interpretation bias for ambiguous social scenarios that depict the risk of rejection in women with anorexia nervosa. J Affect Disord 2018;227:705-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.089
  14. Cardi V, Turton R, Schifano S, Leppanen J, Hirsch CR, Treasure J. Biased interpretation of ambiguous social scenarios in anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2017;25:60-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2493
  15. Platt B, Waters AM, Schulte-Koerne G, Engelmann L, Salemink E. A review of cognitive biases in youth depression: attention, interpretation and memory. Cogn Emot 2017;31:462-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1127215
  16. Stuijfzand S, Creswell C, Field AP, Pearcey S, Dodd H. Research review: is anxiety associated with negative interpretations of ambiguity in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2018;59:1127-1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12822
  17. Enock PM, Hofmann SG, McNally RJ. Attention bias modification training via smartphone to reduce social anxiety: a randomized, controlled multi-session experiment. Cogn Ther Res 2014;38:200-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9606-z
  18. Pergamin-Hight L, Pine DS, Fox NA, Bar-Haim Y. Attention bias modification for youth with social anxiety disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2016;57:1317-1325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12599
  19. Hirsch CR, Hayes S, Mathews A. Looking on the bright side: accessing benign meanings reduces worry. J Abnorm Psychol 2009;118:44-54. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013473
  20. Lothmann C, Holmes EA, Chan SW, Lau JY. Cognitive bias modification training in adolescents: effects on interpretation biases and mood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2011;52:24-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02286.x
  21. Salemink E, Wolters L, de Haan E. Augmentation of treatment as usual with online cognitive bias modification of interpretation training in adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder: a pilot study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2015;49(Pt A):112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.003
  22. Lisk SC, Pile V, Haller SPW, Kumari V, Lau JYF. Multisession cognitive bias modification targeting multiple biases in adolescents with elevated social anxiety. Cognit Ther Res 2018;42:581-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9912-y
  23. Mao N, Li T, Li C, Ding R, Zhang Q, Cui L. Smartphone-based training of cognitive bias modification: efficacy for reducing social anxiety in Chinese adolescents. J Child Fam Stud 2023;32:2394-2405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02619-8
  24. Fu X, Du Y, Au S, Lau JY. Reducing negative interpretations in adolescents with anxiety disorders: a preliminary study investigating the effects of a single session of cognitive bias modification training. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2013;4:29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.003
  25. Orchard F, Apetroaia A, Clarke K, Creswell C. Cognitive bias modification of interpretation in children with social anxiety disorder. J Anxiety Disord 2017;45:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.012
  26. An Z, Kwag KH, Kim M, Yang JW, Shin HJ, Treasure J, et al. Effect of modifying negative interpretation bias toward ambiguous social stimuli across eating and personality disorders. Int J Eat Disord 2023;56:1341-1352. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23936
  27. Rowlands K, Beaty T, Simic M, Grafton B, Hirsch C, Treasure J, et al. Cognitive bias modification training of attention and interpretation to reduce expectations of social rejection in adolescents with eating disorders: a small efficacy randomized controlled trial. Int J Eat Disord 2022;55:1506-1520. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23809
  28. Cardi V, Turton R, Brazil C, Harrison A, Rowlands K, Treasure J, et al. Training rejection interpretation in eating disorders (TRIER): preliminary findings of a feasibility study in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Cogn Ther Res 2019;43:1109-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-10034-x
  29. Cardi V, Esposito M, Bird G, Rhind C, Yiend J, Schifano S, et al. A preliminary investigation of a novel training to target cognitive biases towards negative social stimuli in anorexia nervosa. J Affect Disord 2015;188:188-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.019