Acknowledgement
본 논문은 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구(RS-2024-00350220)임. 이에 감사드립니다.
References
- Bonamassa O, Vidale JE. Directional site resonances observed from aftershocks of the 18 October 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 1991;81(5):1945-1957.
- Stewart JP, Chang SW, Bray JD, Seed RB, Sitar N, Riemer MF. A report on geotechnical aspects of the January 17, 1994 Northridge earthquake. Seismol Res Lett. 1995;66(3):7-19.
- Toda S, Stein RS, Reasenberg PA, Dieterich JH, Yoshida A. Stress transferred by the 1995 Mw=6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 1998;103(B10):24543-24565.
- Oh HJ, Kim YS. An analytical study on seismic response characteristics considering soil-structure-equipment interaction. EESK J Earthq Eng. 2023 Nov;27(6);253-263.
- Kim T, Jeon J-S, Roh H. Seismic response investigation of traffic signal-supporting structures including soil-foundation effects. EESK J Earthq Eng. 2023 Nov;27(6);237-244.
- Shim JE, Choi I, Kim JH. Performance-based evaluation of seismic design proposals for RC ordinary moment frames by spectrum revision. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2022 Sep;26(5);211-217.
- Choi Y, Stewart JP. Nonlinear site amplification as function of 30 m shear wave velocity. Earthq Spectra. 2005;21(1):1-30.
- Kim B, Hashash YMA, Stewart JP, Rathje EM, Harmon JA, Musgrove MI, et al. Relative Differences between Nonlinear and Equivalent-Linear 1-D Site Response Analyses. Earthq Spectra. 2016 Aug;32(3):1845-1865.
- Kamal M, Inel M. A new equation for prediction of seismic gap between adjacent buildings located on different soil types. J Build Eng. 2022 Oct;57:104784.
- Idriss I. Earthquake ground motions at soft soil sites. International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics; Mar 11; St. Louis: University of Missouri; c1991.
- Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ. Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett. 1997 Jan;68(1):94-127.
- Rathje EM, Kottke AR, Trent WL. Influence of input motion and site property variabilities on seismic site response analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2010 Apr;136(4):607-619.
- Karapetrou ST, Fotopoulou SD, Pitilakis KD. Seismic vulnerability assessment of high-rise non-ductile RC buildings considering soil-structure interaction effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2015 Jun; 73:42-57.
- Bayraktar A, Hokelekli E. Influences of earthquake input models on nonlinear seismic performances of minaret-foundation-soil interaction systems. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020 Dec;139:106368.
- Fathi A, Sadeghi A, Emami Azadi MR, Hoveidae N. Assessing the soil-structure interaction effects by direct method on the out-of-plane behavior of masonry structures (case study: Arge-Tabriz). Bull Earthq Eng. 2020 Nov;18:6429-6443.
- Brunelli A, de Silva F, Cattari S. Site effects and soil-foundation-structure interaction: derivation of fragility curves and comparison with codes-conforming approaches for a masonry school. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2022 Mar;154:107125.
- Soltani-Azar S. Evaluation of the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings based on time-history analysis considering nonlinear soil effects. J Earthq Eng. 2022 Jun 16;1-21.
- Cho HI, Manandhar S, Kim DS, Site classification and design response spectra for seismic code provisions - (I) database and site response analysis. EESK J Earthq Eng. 2016 July;20(4);235-243.
- Lee JS, The effects of the shear wave velocity of a seismic control point on site response analysis. EESK J Earthq Eng. 2009 Feb;13(1);1-8.
- Boore DM, Gibbs JF, Rodriguez M. A compendium of P-and S-wave velocities from surface-to-borehole logging: Summary and reanalysis of previously published data and analysis of unpublished data. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey; c2003.
- Kayen R, Carkin B, Minasian D, Tinsley J. Shear wave velocity of the ground near southern California TRINET sites using the spectral analysis of surface waves method (SASW) and parallel-arrayed harmonic-wave sources. US. Geological Survey; c2005.
- Thompson EM, Kayen RE, Carkin B, Tanaka H. Surface-wave site characterization at 53 strong-motion recording stations affected by the Parkfield, California, M6.0 earthquake of 28 September 2004. US Geological Survey; c2010.
- Jeon J-S, Lowes LN, DesRoches R, Brilakis I. Fragility curves for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames that exhibit different component response mechanisms. Eng Struct. 2015 Feb;85:127-143.
- Baker JW, Lin T, Shahi SK, Jayaram N. New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research program. PEER report. 2011;3.
- Matasovic N, Vucetic M. Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. J Geotech Eng. 1993;119(11):1805-1822.
- Griffiths SC, Cox BR, Rathje EM. Challenges associated with site response analyses for soft soils subjected to high-intensity input ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2016 Jun;85:1-10.
- Phillips C, Hashash YMA. Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2009 Jul;29(7):1143-1158.
- Darendeli MB. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. The University of Texas at Austin; c2001.
- Hashash YMA, Musgrove M, Harmon J, Ilhan O, Xing G, Numanoglu O, et al. DEEPSOIL 7, User Manual. Urbana, IL, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; c2020.
- Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Building Sciences; c2009. 388p. (FEMA P-750). Report No.: P-750.
- Haselton CB, Liel AB, Deierlein GG, Dean BS, Chou JH. Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: Assessment of ductile Moment frames. J Struct Eng. 2011 Apr 1;137(4):481-91.
- American Concrete Institute (ACI), Building code requriements for structural concrete and commentary, ACI 318-02/ACI 318R-02, Farmington Hills; c2002.
- American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI 7-02, Reston, VA; c2002.
- International Code Council (ICC), International building code. Falls Church, VA; c2003.
- McKenna F. OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Comput Sci Eng. 2011;13(4):58-66.
- Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2005;34(12):1489-1511.
- Haselton CB, Liel AB, Lange ST, Deierlein GG, Beam-column element model calibrated for predicting flexural response leading to global collapse of RC frame buildings, PEER Rep, No. 2007/03, Pacific Earhtquake Engineering Reserach Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA; c2008.
- Zahn FA. Design of reinforced concrete bridge columns for strength and ductility. Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury; c1985.
- Tanaka H. Effect of lateral confining reinforcement on the ductile behaviour of reinforced concrete columns. Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury; c1990.
- Chopra AK. Dynamics of structures. Pearson Education India; c2007.
- Kaklamanos J, Baise LG, Thompson EM, Dorfmann L. Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2015 Feb;69:207-219.
- Stewart JP , Afshari K, Hashash YM. Guidelines for performing hazard-consistent one-dimensional ground response analysis for ground motion prediction. Peer Rep. 2014;16:117.
- USGS Earthquake Hazard Toolbox. [cited 2024 Apr 23]. Available from: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/nshmp/
- Borcherdt RD. Empirical evidence for acceleration-dependent amplification factors. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 2002;92(2):761-782.
- Stewart JP, Seyhan E. Semi-Empirical Nonlinear Site Amplification and its Application in NEHRP Site Factors. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; c2013 Nov.