Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy of interocclusal record established by different occlusal scans

교합스캔의 이용 방식에 따른 교합면간기록의 정확성

  • Minjee Kang (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cheong-Hee Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kyu-Bok Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • So-Yeun Kim (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Du-Hyeong Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 강민지 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이청희 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이규복 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김소연 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이두형 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2024.06.13
  • Accepted : 2024.07.02
  • Published : 2024.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of digital mounting with occlusal scans in the interocclusal record for a full-mouth fixed prosthetic treatment condition. Materials and Methods: The entire maxillary teeth were prepared in a dentiform model and attached to an articulator in maximum intercuspation. Temporary crowns were fabricated and occlusion was adjusted. After scanning the arch with tooth preparation, digital mounting was performed using an occlusion scan of the anterior or posterior teeth areas. The accuracy of the positioned jaw relation was evaluated three-dimensionally through positional deviation and angular error of the occlusal plane. Afterwards, the same procedure was repeated on the partially edentulous model to evaluate the accuracy of digital interocclusal record. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis, and the significance level was set at 0.05. Results: There was no significant difference in the positional error at the center of the arch in the digitally established jaw relation depending on the scan area used and remaining tooth conditions (P = 0.53). The angular error of the occlusal plane was larger when the anterior teeth were used as the overlapping area, and a smaller error value was observed when both posterior teeth were used as the overlapping area (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of bilateral posterior occlusal scans is recommended when digitally mounting the jaw relation established with temporary teeth during full-mouth fixed prosthetic treatment.

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 전악 고정성 보철치료 조건에서 임시 보철물로 확립된 상하악의 관계를 구강스캐너를 통하여 교합스캔을 채득하고 디지털 방식으로 마운팅할 때 교합면간기록의 정확성을 조사하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 덴티폼 모형을 사용하여 교합기에서 최대 교두간 접촉위로 부착한 후 상악 전체 치아를 삭제하였다. 임시 보철물을 제작하고 교합 조정을 시행하였다. 삭제한 악궁을 스캔한 뒤, 전치부 혹은 구치부 교합스캔을 통해 디지털 마운팅을 시행하였다. 위치된 교합면간기록의 정확성을 3차원적인 위치 편차와 교합평면의 각도 오차를 통해 평가하였다. 이후 부분 무치악 모델에서도 동일한 절차를 반복하여 디지털 교합면간기록의 정확성을 평가하였다. 통계에는 Kruskal-Wallis 검정과 Mann-Whitney U 검정이 이용되었고, 유의수준은 0.05로 설정하였다. 결과: 디지털 방식으로 설정된 교합면간기록에서 치아 정중부의 위치 오차는 스캔 영역과 잔존 치아 조건에 따라 유의한 차이가 없었다(P = 0.53). 교합평면의 각도 오차는 전치부를 중첩 영역으로 사용했을 때 크게 나타났으며, 양측 구치부를 중첩 영역으로 사용한 경우 작은 오차값을 보였다(P < 0.001). 결론: 전악 고정성 보철 치료 시 임시 보철물로 확립된 상하악 관계를 디지털 방식으로 마운팅을 할 때 양측 구치부 교합 스캔 자료를 사용하는 것이 추천된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: 202011A02).

References

  1. Venezia P, Torsello F, D'Amato S, Cavalcanti R. Digital cross-mounting: a new opportunity in prosthetic dentistry. Quintessence Int 2017;48:701-9.
  2. Kavitha M. Cant in the interpupillary line. Br Dent J 2019;227:762.
  3. Sasbri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:155-67.
  4. Mai HN, Win TT, Duong CP, Kim J, Lee DH. Reliable Reference Areas for Three-dimensional Smiling Facial Model Alignments: Posed Versus Natural Smile Expressions. Int J Prosthodont 2023 May 30. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8364. Online ahead of print.
  5. Luu D, Kan E, Kim SW, Lee JD, Lee SJ. Comparison of accuracy in digital and conventional crossmounting. J Prosthet Dent 2022 Dec 3:S0022-3913(22)00693-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.001. Online ahead of print.
  6. Joda T, Katsoulis J, Bragger U. Clinical fitting and adjustment time for implant-supported crowns comparing digital and conventional workflows. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:946-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12377
  7. Guth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1445-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4
  8. Sun J, Pu T, Ding Q, Xu H, Kang Y, Zhang L. Digital replication and transfer of interim to definitive complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses by using a laboratory scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2023 Jul 13:S0022-3913(23)00361-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.020. Online ahead of print.
  9. Mullick SC, Stackhouse JA Jr, Vincent GR. A study of r materials. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:304-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90219-5
  10. Tejo SK, Kumar AG, Kattimani VS, Desai PD, Nalla S, Chaitanya KK. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials an in-vitro multi-centre study. Head Face Med 2012;8:27.
  11. Tripodakis AP, Vergos VK, Tsoutsos AG. Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:141-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70227-0
  12. Ries JM, Grunler C, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods. J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:994-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.005
  13. American National Standards/American Dental Association, Specification 25 for dental gypsum products. New York; American National Standards Institute; 2000. p. 244-53.
  14. Heshmati RH, Nagy WW, Wirth CG, Dhuru VB. Delayed linear expansion of improved dental stone. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.127653
  15. Edher F, Hannam AG, Tobias DL, Wyatt CCL. The accuracy of virtual inter-occlusal registration during intraoral scanning. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:904-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.024
  16. Padwa BL, Kaiser MO, Kaban LB. Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:811-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90338-4