DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of ESG Management on Social Welfare Organizations

  • Ha-Yong JUNG (Department of Business, Gukje Cyber University) ;
  • Sun-Kyung KANG (Graduate School of Theology, Social Welfare Department, Sogang University)
  • Received : 2024.07.26
  • Accepted : 2024.08.28
  • Published : 2024.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: There is a significant opportunity for ESG management to act as a useful guideline for social welfare organizational structures when dealing with sustainability and ethical leadership. The ESG guidelines should allow these companies to improve their business efficacy. This paper aims to explore the specific impacts of ESG management on social welfare. Research design, data and methodology: The systematic review approach ensures that quality work is undertaken in tackling the existing gaps in the literature on ESG management in social welfare organizations. The outcomes of this review will give a useful 'real-life' picture of the consequences of ESG practices and suggestions that can increase the efficiency and sustainability of social welfare organizations. Results: The principal favorable consequences are discussed in this chapter regarding the social welfare organization due to the implementation of ESG management. Subsequently, each effect is posted under different sub-titles and evidence from previously conducted research studies. Conclusions: ESG management is vital for social welfare organizations since it increases their efficiency in operations, public image, and opportunities to receive funds, and it helps improve relations with stakeholders. More so, these organizations can embrace the ESG practices and as a result bring more efficiency to the general welfare of the society.

Keywords

References

  1. Niu, S., Park, B. I., & Jung, J. S. (2022). The effects of digital leadership and ESG management on organizational innovation and sustainability. Sustainability, 14(23), 15639. 
  2. Park, S. R., & Jang, J. Y. (2021). The impact of ESG management on investment decision: Institutional investors' perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3), 48. 
  3. Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829. 
  4. Veenstra, E. M., & Ellemers, N. (2020). ESG indicators as organizational performance goals: Do rating agencies encourage a holistic approach?. Sustainability, 12(24), 10228. 
  5. Jin, M., & Kim, B. (2022). The effects of ESG activity recognition of corporate employees on job performance: The case of South Korea. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 316. 
  6. Krishnamoorthy, R. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing: Doing good to do well. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(7), 189-197. 
  7. Chams, N., Garcia-Blandon, J., & Hassan, K. (2021). Role reversal! financial performance as an antecedent of ESG: The moderating effect of total quality management. Sustainability, 13(13), 7026. 
  8. Aich, S., Thakur, A., Nanda, D., Tripathy, S., & Kim, H. C. (2021). Factors affecting ESG towards impact on investment: A structural approach. Sustainability, 13(19), 10868. 
  9. Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910. 
  10. Katsamakas, E., Miliaresis, K., & Pavlov, O. V. (2022). Digital platforms for the common good: Social innovation for active citizenship and ESG. Sustainability, 14(2), 639. 
  11. Cho, Y., Kim, S., You, J., Moon, H., & Sung, H. (2021). Application of ESG measures for gender diversity and equality at the organizational level in a Korean context. European Journal of Training and Development, 45(4/5), 346-365. 
  12. Karwowski, M., & Raulinajtys-Grzybek, M. (2021). The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1270-1284.