산업진흥연구 (Industry Promotion Research)

  • 제9권3호
  • /
  • Pages.41-55
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2466-1139(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-013X(eISSN)
산업진흥원 (Industrial Promotion Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 전략이 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 관계적 행동차원, 인지차원 및 지속적인 디지털 전환을 중심으로

The Impact of Digital Strategies on Corporate Performance: Focusing on Relational Behavior Dimensions, Cognitive Dimensions and Sustaining Digital Transformation

  • 양현아 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 서영욱 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과)
  • Hyun-Ah Yang (Department of Management Consulting, Daejeon University) ;
  • Young-Wook Seo (Department of Management Consulting, Daejeon University)
  • 투고 : 2024.06.28
  • 심사 : 2024.07.15
  • 발행 : 2024.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 사회적 자본 이론을 기반으로 디지털 전략이 기업의 관계적 행동, 인지 차원, 지속적인 디지털 전환을 통해 기업 성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 연구모형은 1년 이상 근무한 국내 기업 종사자 300명을 대상으로 2024년 2월 20일부터 2월 23일 설문으로 수집한 자료를 이용해 테스트하였으며, Smart PLS 4.0을 사용하였다. 주요 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 디지털 전략이 조직 내 협력과 상호작용을 촉진하고 구성원들의 디지털 기술 이해와 인식을 향상시키며, 지속적인 변화와 혁신을 통해 기업의 경쟁력을 강화하는 데 중요한 역할을 한다는 것이 확인되었다. 둘째, 지속적인 디지털 전환과 인지 차원이 기업 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 반면, 관계적 행동 차원의 영향은 유의미하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과는 디지털 전략이 단순한 기술 도입을 넘어 조직 내 상호작용과 인식 변화를 촉진함으로써 기업성과에 중요한 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 시사하며, 한국 기업들이 디지털 전환을 효과적으로 추진할 수 있는 전략적 시사점을 제공한다.

This study analyzes the impact of digital strategy on firm performance through relational behavior, cognitive dimensions, and continuous digital transformation based on social capital theory. The research model was tested using data collected from a survey of 300 domestic corporate employees who have worked for over a year, conducted from February 20 to 23, 2024, using Smart PLS 4.0. The key findings of the study are as follows: First, it was confirmed that digital strategy plays a crucial role in promoting cooperation and interaction within the organization, enhancing members' understanding and perception of digital technology, and strengthening the firm's competitiveness through continuous change and innovation. Second, continuous digital transformation and cognitive dimensions positively impact firm performance, while the influence of relational behavior dimensions was found to be insignificant. These findings suggest that digital strategy can significantly affect firm performance by fostering interaction and perception changes within the organization, beyond mere technology adoption, and provide strategic implications for Korean firms to effectively pursue digital transformation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesbkck, F. Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123-139. 2016.
  2. Bleicher, J., & Stanley, H. Digitization as a catalyst for business model innovation: a three-step approach to facilitating economic success. Journal of Business Management, 12, 62-71. 2016.
  3. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. Digital ubiquity: How connections, sensors, and data are revolutionizing business. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 90-99. 2014.
  4. Wald, D., de Laubier, R., & Charanya, T. The five rules of digital strategy. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/de-de/publications/2019/five-rules-digital-strategy. 2019.
  5. Abdullah, S., Nawi, M. N. M., Halim, M. A. S. A., Omar, K., Rosli, N. A., & Harun, A. N. Digital transformation for sustainable business performance: A systematic literature review and the way forward. UCJC Business and Society Review, 21(80), 48-83. 2024.
  6. Nwankpa, J. K., & Roumani, Y. IT capability and digital transformation: A firm performance perspective. In Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems. 2016.
  7. Ritala, P., Baiyere, A., Hughes, M., & Kraus, S. Digital strategy implementation: The role of individual entrepreneurial orientation and relational capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 120961. 2021.
  8. Noesgaard, M. S., & Frances, J. Building organizational commitment through cognitive and relational job crafting. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2018(1), 1-1. 2018.
  9. Li, Y., & Fei, G. Z. Network embeddedness, digital transformation, and enterprise performance-The moderating effect of top managerial cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. 2023.
  10. Weinberg, B. D., & Pehlivan, E. Social spending: Managing the social media mix. Business Horizons, 54(3), 275-282. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.008
  11. Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 241-58). Routledge. 1986.
  12. Coleman, J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  13. Putnam, R. D. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. In Culture and politics: A reader (pp. 223-234). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. 2000.
  14. Bhandari, H., & Yasunobu, K. What is social capital? A comprehensive review of the concept. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37(3), 480-510. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853109X436847
  15. Bican, P. M., & Brem, A. Digital business model, digital transformation, digital entrepreneurship: Is there a sustainable 'digital'? Sustainability, 12(13), 5239. 2020.
  16. Masoud, R., & Basahel, S. The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: The role of customer experience and IT innovation. Digital, 3(2), 109-126. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3020008
  17. Hautala-Kankaanp, T. The impact of digitalization on firm performance: examining the role of digital culture and the effect of supply chain capability. Business Process Management Journal, 28(8), 90-109. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2022-0122
  18. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
  19. Lipsmeier, A., K hn, A., Joppen, R., & Dumitrescu, R. Process for the development of a digital strategy. Procedia CIRP, 88, 173-178. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.031
  20. Friedrich, S., & Rachholz, J. Digitalisierung-Management Zwischen 0 und 1. Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, 25(41), 87-89. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/rput-2017-0025
  21. Ennemann, M., & Linden, S. Survival of the Smartest 2016-Studie zur digitalen Transformation. Frankfurt am Main: KPMG AG. 2016.
  22. Turuk, M. Digital strategy. International Journal of Contemporary Business and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 62-76. 2020. https://doi.org/10.47954/ijcbe.1.1.5
  23. Hewett, K., & Bearden, W. O. Dependence, trust, and relational behavior on the part of foreign subsidiary marketing operations: implications for managing global marketing operations. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 51-66. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.4.51.18380
  24. Ning, Y., & Ling, F. Y. Y. Reducing hindrances to adoption of relational behaviors in public construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11), 1. 2013.
  25. Ivens, B. S. How relevant are different forms of relational behavior? An empirical test based on Macneil's exchange framework. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19, 300-309. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620410549929
  26. Zheng, X., Lu, Y., Le, Y., Li, Y., & Fang, J. Formation of interorganizational relational behavior in mega projects: Perspective of the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(1), 04017052. 2017.
  27. Lu, W., & Guo, W. The effect of task conflict on relationship quality: The mediating role of relational behavior. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 12(4), 297-321. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12150
  28. De Dreu, C. K., & Van Vianen, A. E. Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(3), 309-328. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.71
  29. Bonfim, L. R., Segatto, A. P., & Takahashi, A. R. W. The structural, relational and cognitive dimensions of social capital on innovation and technology in interorganizational and intraorganizational settings. 2017.
  30. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476. 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/257085
  31. Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Harvard Business School Press, 80(1), 107. 2002.
  32. Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M. R., & Scuotto, V. Student entrepreneurship, creativity and success. How much does knowledge heterogeneity really matter? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(1), 45-58. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2014.062789
  33. Allameh, S. M. Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: The role of social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 858-874. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2017-0068
  34. Skderlund, M. Customer familiarity and its effects on satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 19(10), 861-879. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10041
  35. Broccardo, L., Zicari, A., Jabeen, F., & Bhatti, Z. A. How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122146. 2023.
  36. Martknez-Pel ez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Fklix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., & Mena, L. J. Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability, 15(14), 11221. 2023.
  37. Rupeika-Apoga, R., & Petrovska, K. Barriers to sustainable digital transformation in micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises. Sustainability, 14(20), 13558. 2022.
  38. Melo, I. C., Queiroz, G. A., Junior, P. N. A., de Sousa, T. B., Yushimito, W. F., & Pereira, J. Sustainable digital transformation in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A review on performance. Heliyon, 9(3). 2023.
  39. Do, T. D., Pham, H. A. T., Thalassinos, E. I., & Le, H. A. The impact of digital transformation on performance: Evidence from Vietnamese commercial banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), 21. 2022.
  40. Gao, D., Yan, Z., Zhou, X., & Mo, X. Smarter and prosperous: Digital transformation and enterprise performance. Systems, 11(7), 329. 2023.
  41. Han, G., & Tang, S. Research on the impact of digital transformation on financial performance of Chinese listed companies. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Economic Management and Big Data Applications, ICEMBDA 2023. 2023.
  42. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482. 2013. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
  43. Xue, F., Zhao, X., & Tan, Y. Digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises: an empirical study on the relationships between digital transformation, boundary spanning, and sustainable competitive advantage. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 1-16. 2022.
  44. Dash, B., & Gatharia, J. Impact of digital transformation on organizational behaviors. Available at SSRN 4580389. 2015.
  45. Canhoto, A. I., Quinton, S., Pera, R., Molinillo, S., & Simkin, L. Digital strategy aligning in SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30(3), 101682. 2021.
  46. Teng, X., Wu, Z., & Yang, F. Research on the relationship between digital transformation and performance of SMEs. Sustainability, 14(10), 6012. 2022.
  47. Ivens, B. S. How relevant are different forms of relational behavior? An empirical test based on Macneil's exchange framework. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(5), 300-309. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620410549929
  48. Kocoglu, I., Imamoglu, S. Z., & Ince, H. The relationship between organizational learning and firm performance: The mediating roles of innovation and TQM. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 9(3), 72-88. 2011. https://doi.org/10.20460/JGSM.2011515814
  49. Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & El i, A. Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104-114. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003
  50. Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. The industrial management of SMEs in the era of industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 1118-1136. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647
  51. Zhang, T., Shi, Z. Z., Shi, Y. R., & Chen, N. J. Enterprise digital transformation and production efficiency: Mechanism analysis and empirical research. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 35, 2781-2792. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1980731
  52. Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57, 3-43. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452
  53. Tsou, H. T., & Chen, J. S. How does digital technology usage benefit firm performance? Digital transformation strategy and organizational innovation as mediators. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-14. 2021.
  54. AlNuaimi, B. K., Singh, S. K., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038
  55. Scuotto, V., Arrigo, E., Candelo, E., & Nicotra, M. Ambidextrous innovation orientation effected by the digital transformation: A quantitative research on fashion SMEs. Business Process Management Journal, 26(5), 1121-1140. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2019-0135
  56. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press, 18(12), 16. 2014.