Hip & pelvis

  • 제36권1호
  • /
  • Pages.37-46
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2287-3260(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3279(eISSN)
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mid-term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis after Acetabular Fracture

  • Sharath K. Ramanath (Consultant Orthopedics, Fracture and Ortho Clinic) ;
  • Tejas Tribhuvan (Department of Orthopedics, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital) ;
  • Uday Chandran (Department of Orthopedics, The Oxford Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre) ;
  • Rahul Hemant Shah (Department of Orthopedics, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital) ;
  • Ajay Kaushik (Department of Orthopedics, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital) ;
  • Sandesh Patil (Department of Orthopedics, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2023.05.20
  • 심사 : 2023.09.13
  • 발행 : 2024.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The prognosis of total hip replacement (THR) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus THR following non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures is unclear. Few studies have been conducted in this regard. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to perform an assessment and compare the functional outcomes for study subjects in the ORIF and non-ORIF groups during the follow-up period compared to baseline. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal comparative study, which included 40 patients who underwent THR for either posttraumatic arthritis after fixation of an acetabular fracture or arthritis following conservative management of a fracture, was conducted for 60 months. Twenty-four patients had undergone ORIF, and 16 patients had undergone nonoperative/conservative management for acetabular fractures. Following THR, the patients were followed up for monitoring of functional outcomes for the Harris hip score (HHS) and comparison between the ORIF and non-ORIF groups was performed. Results: The HHS showed significant improvement in both ORIF and non-ORIF groups. At the end of the mean follow-up period, no significant variation in scores was observed between the groups, i.e., ORIF group (91.61±6.64) compared to non-ORIF group (85.74±11.56). A significantly higher number of re-interventions were required for medial wall fractures and combined fractures compared to posterior fractures (P <0.05). Conclusion: THR resulted in improved functional outcome during follow-up in both the groups; however, the ORIF group was observed to have better functional outcome. Re-intervention was not required for any of the posterior fractures at the end of the mean follow-up period.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hoge S, Chauvin BJ. StatPearls. Acetabular fracture. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
  2. Gautam D, Gupta S, Malhotra R. Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:1090-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.037 Erratum in: J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;21:101558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101558
  3. Smits I, Koenders N, Stirler V, Hermans E. Hip function after surgically treated isolated traumatic acetabular fracture: a prospective series of consecutive cases. Hip Pelvis. 2023;35:133-41. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2023.35.2.133
  4. Henry PDG, Park SS, Paterson JM, Kreder HJ, Jenkinson R, Wasserstein D. Risk of hip arthroplasty after open reduction internal fixation of a fracture of the acetabulum: a matched cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:134-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001048
  5. Walley KC, Appleton PT, Rodriguez EK. Comparison of outcomes of operative versus non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures in the elderly and severely comorbid patient. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27:689-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1949-1
  6. Telleria JJ, Gee AO. Classifications in brief: Paprosky classification of acetabular bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3725-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3264-4
  7. Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Candela V, Berton A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Hip scores: a current concept review. Br Med Bull. 2019;131:81-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldz026
  8. Singh JA, Schleck C, Harmsen S, Lewallen D. Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris Hip Score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1106-8
  9. Kumar P, Sen R, Aggarwal S, Agarwal S, Rajnish RK. Reliability of Modified Harris Hip Score as a tool for outcome evaluation of Total Hip Replacements in Indian population. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10:128-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.019
  10. Gandbhir VN, Lam JC, Rayi A. StatPearls. Trendelenburg gait. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
  11. El-Bakoury A, Khedr W, Williams M, Eid Y, Hammad AS. The outcome of the uncemented acetabular component in delayed total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures. Bone Jt Open. 2021;2:1067-74. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0118.R1
  12. DC S, Ramanath SK, Grover A, Gadi D. Uncemented total hip replacement after two years of neglected hip dislocation with fracture of posterior column and wall of the acetabulum. Trauma Mon. 2016;21:e25301.
  13. Sierra RJ, Mabry TM, Sems SA, Berry DJ. Acetabular fractures: the role of total hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):11-6. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32897
  14. Schreurs BW, Zengerink M, Welten ML, van Kampen A, Slooff TJ. Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3-18 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(437):145-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000164408.86710.dc
  15. Jimenez ML, Tile M, Schenk RS. Total hip replacement after acetabular fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:435-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70300-x
  16. Romness DW, Lewallen DG. Total hip arthroplasty after fracture of the acetabulum. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:761-4. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B5.2211750
  17. van den Broek M, Govaers K. Total hip arthroplasty with cemented dual mobility cup into a fully porous multihole cup with variable angle locking screws for acetabular fractures in the frail elderly. Hip Pelvis. 2023;35:54-61. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2023.35.1.54
  18. Lizaur-Utrilla A, Sanz-Reig J, Serna-Berna R. Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture: a prospective, matched-cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:232-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31824cf39e
  19. Ranawat A, Zelken J, Helfet D, Buly R. Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:759-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.004
  20. Zhang L, Zhou Y, Li Y, Xu H, Guo X, Zhou Y. Total hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of acetabular fractures: a 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1189-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.024
  21. Huo MH, Solberg BD, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ. Total hip replacements done without cement after acetabular fractures: a 4- to 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:827-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90033-5
  22. Berry DJ, Halasy M. Uncemented acetabular components for arthritis after acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(405):164-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200212000-00020
  23. Lee YK, Kim KC, Kim JW, et al. Use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis of the hip. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019;27:2309499019836378. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019836378
  24. Bellabarba C, Berger RA, Bentley CD, et al. Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:868-76. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200106000-00008