Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Pedagogical Study on the Conflict Experiences of Middle School Physical Education Teachers

중학교 체육교사의 갈등경험에 관한 교육학적 연구

  • 김승용 (동서울대학교 레저스포츠학과)
  • Received : 2024.05.31
  • Accepted : 2024.07.20
  • Published : 2024.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to deeply understand and analyze the meaning of the various conflict experiences experienced by middle school physical education teachers in the physical education field through a phenomenological method and to explore the essence of it from an educational perspective. Regarding the research method, the research participants were four current middle school physical education teachers, and this study was conducted using Colaizzi's phenomenological research method, one of the qualitative research methodologies. The research results are as follows. First, general conflicts were categorized into student guidance and human relationships as conflicts between teachers and students. Second, job conflicts were categorized into teacher culture and communication as conflicts between teachers and teachers. Third, relationship conflicts were categorized into role expectations and power exercise as conflicts between teachers and parents. In conclusion, by analyzing in-depth the aspects of conflict experienced by middle school physical education teachers, it is necessary to effectively resolve various conflicts and, in particular, create a more positive educational environment by minimizing conflicts in the educational field.

본 연구는 중학교 체육교사들이 체육교육 현장에서 겪는 다양한 갈등경험을 현상학적 방법을 통하여 그 의미를 심층적으로 이해하고 분석하여 그 본질을 교육학적으로 탐구하는 것이다. 연구방법과 관련하여 연구 참여자는 현직 중학교 체육교사 4명이며 질적 연구방법론의 하나인 Colaizzi의 현상학적 연구방법을 통해 본 연구를 수행하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 일반적 갈등은 교사와 학생의 갈등으로서 학생지도 및 인간관계로 범주화되었다. 둘째, 직무 갈등은 교사와 교사의 갈등으로서 교직 문화 및 의사소통으로 범주화되었다. 셋째, 관계 갈등은 교사와 학부모와의 갈등으로서 역할기대 및 권력 행사로 범주화되었다. 결론적으로 중학교 체육교사가 경험하는 갈등의 양상을 심층적으로 분석함으로써 다양한 갈등을 효과적으로 해결하고, 특히 교육 현장에서의 갈등을 최소화하여 보다 긍정적인 교육 환경을 조성할 수 있도록 해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. N. S. Bae. (2021). A case study on the conflict experience of elementary school teachers in the implementation of teacher-level curriculum. Master's Thesis. Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk.
  2. D. W. Johnson & R. T. Johnson, (1990). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 29-33.
  3. C. S. An & M. O. Shim. (2003). Teachers' perceptions of conflicts in the elementary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 20, 183-223.
  4. M. O. Shim. (2001). Anaysis of conflict and leaving factors in teaching. Journal of Educational Research, 18, 141-160.
  5. S. E. Lee. (1995). A phenomenological approach to the conflicts experienced by teachers. The Journal of Educational Administration, 13(1), 183-205.
  6. J. S. Lee. (2002). Exploration of elementary school culture. Gyeonggi-do: Kyoyookgwahaksa.
  7. D. C. Lortie. (2020). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago press.
  8. J. S. Jung. (2004). A study on the professional adaptation of beginning elementary school teachers. Journal of elementary education studies, 11(2), 141-162.
  9. J. P. Park. (2009). A study on the beginning teachers' experiences in elementary schools. The Korea educational review, 15(3), 131-157.
  10. J. H. Jung & Y. C. Kim. (2005). Professional development and dilemmas of Korean first year elementary teachers. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 13(2), 71-10.
  11. K. H. Ryu & B. C. Kim. (2015). Qualitative case study on conflict aspect and causes that teachers experience: focused on secondary school science teachers who participated in first-grade teacher qualification program. The Journal of Educational Administration, 33(3), 483-512.
  12. K. M. Go. (2006). A analytical study on the conflicts among teachers over curriculum development of elementary school. Doctoral dissertation. Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do.
  13. S. Goksoy & T. Argon. (2016). Conflicts at Schools and Their Impact on Teachers. Journal of Education and Training studies, 4(4), 197-205. DOI : 10.11114/jets.v4i4.1388
  14. Y. J. Jung. (2015). A study on parent-teacher communication: from the viewpoint of communication theory of Niklas Luhmann, Doctoral dissertation. Inha University, Incheon.
  15. O. J. Kim. (2018). The relationship between elementary school teachers' conflict management types and conflict factors and school organization effectiveness: Through the latent profile analysis. Doctoral dissertation. Konkuk University, Seoul.
  16. M. J. Park & Y. K. Sung. (2011). Elementary school teacher perceptions of the national curriculum and its implementation based on grounded theory. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 19(3), 1-26.
  17. D. D. Jon, R. M. Amy, D. Corey & L. S. Amanda. (2019). Teachers' perceptions of the official curriculum: Problem solving and rigor. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 91-100. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.10.002
  18. K. M. Lim. (2018). The Process of Elementary school Teachers' Overcoming Conflicts and Their Growth. Doctoral dissertation. Chonbuk University, Jeonbuk.
  19. Y. C. Kim. (2016). Qualitative Research Methodology I: Bricoleur. Gyeonggi-do: Academy Press.
  20. P. F. Colaizzi. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle., & M. King (Ed.). Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Oxford University Press.
  21. I. Seidman. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.
  22. J. W. Creswell. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oak, CA:Sage Publication, Inc. 2nd ed.
  23. Y. S. Lincoln. & E. G. Guba. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks Calif: Sage.