대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제62권3호
  • /
  • Pages.243-252
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

상하악 완전 무치악 환자에서 임시 보철물 스캔을 이용한 일체형 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철물 수복 증례

Fabrication of definitive complete-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis in upper and lower completely edentulous patient using temporary prosthesis scan: a case report

  • 정승미 (디지털월드치과) ;
  • 손현락 (뉴튼치과병원) ;
  • 최강덕 (선한이웃치과) ;
  • 최병호 (연세대학교 원주세브란스기독병원)
  • Seung-Mi Jeong (Digital World Dental Clinic) ;
  • Hyun-Lak Son (Newton Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kang-Duck Choi (Good-friendship Dental Clinic) ;
  • Byung-Ho Choi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2024.05.27
  • 심사 : 2024.07.05
  • 발행 : 2024.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

상하악 완전 무치악 환자에서 임플란트 지지 고정성 최종 보철물을 제작할 때 환자의 수직 고경, 악간관계, 구강내에 식립된 임플란트와 임플란트에 연결된 지대주, 그리고 잇몸 형태에 관한 정확한 정보의 체득이 중요하다. 본 증례에서는 임시 보철물을 통해서 이러한 정보들을 채득하여 최종 보철물을 제작하였다. 임시 보철물을 구강 밖에서 스캔하여 스캔의 효율성을 높였고, 스캔 때 임시 보철물의 양측 후방 부위를 연결하는 스캔지그를 사용하여 스캔의 정밀도를 향상시켰다. 본 증례에서는 이와 같은 디지털 기술을 활용하여 심미적, 기능적으로 만족할 만한 임상적 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하는 바이다.

When fabricating definitive implant-supported fixed prostheses in upper and lower completely edentulous patients, it is crucial to get information about the vertical dimension, jaw relationship, implants, abutments and gingival contour. In this case, temporary prostheses were used to take the information. The temporary prosthesis was scanned outside of the mouth so that it increased the efficiency of scanning it. During the scan of the prosthesis, a scan zig which connected both posterior parts of the prosthesis was used to minimize the scan errors. We report this case because we obtained satisfactory functional and esthetic results by using the digital technology.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Celebic A, Knezovic-Zlataric D, Papic M, Carek V, Baucic I, Stipetic J. Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:M948-53. 
  2. Leesungbok R. Lee's Top-Down implant dentistry. 1st ed. Seoul: Myoung Mun Publishing Co., 2004. p. 9-23. 
  3. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. 1st ed., St. Louis, Mosby, 2004. p. 212-5. 
  4. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:310-20. 
  5. Bozini T, Petridis H, Garefis K, Garefis P. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:304-18. 
  6. Kwon T, Bain PA, Levin L. Systematic review of short- (5-10 years) and long-term (10 years or more) survival and success of full-arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants. J Dent 2014;42:1228-41. 
  7. Drago CJ, Peterson T. Treatment of an edentulous patient with CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 2007;16:200-8. 
  8. Morgan MJ, James DF, Pilliar RM. Fractures of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:409-14. 
  9. Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Enkling N, Katsoulis K, Blatz MB. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:44-9. 
  10. Hjalmarsson L, Ortorp A, Smedberg JI, Jemt T. Precision of fit to implants: a comparison of CrescoTM and Procera® implant bridge frameworks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:271-80. 
  11. Fernandez MA, Paez de Mendoza CY, Platt JA, Levon JA, Hovijitra ST, Nimmo A. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations. J Prosthodont 2013;22:367-76. 
  12. Ishigaki S, Nakano T, Yamada S, Nakamura T, Takashima F. Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:97-102. 
  13. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Botto J. The All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:565-77. 
  14. Miyamoto Y, Fujisawa K, Takechi M, Momota Y, Yuasa T, Tatehara S, Nagayama M, Yamauchi E. Effect of the additional installation of implants in the posterior region on the prognosis of treatment in the edentulous mandibular jaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:727-33. 
  15. Omar R, Wise MD. Mandibular flexure associated with muscle force applied in the retruded axis position. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:209-21. 
  16. Choi AH, Conway RC, Taraschi V, Ben-Nissan B. Biomechanics and functional distortion of the human mandible. J Investig Clin Dent 2015;6:241-51. 
  17. Gulsoy M, Tuna SH, Pekkan G. Evaluation of median mandibular flexure values in dentulous and edentulous subjects by using an intraoral digital scanner. J Adv Prosthodont 2022;14:32-44. 
  18. Fischman BM. The influence of fixed splints on mandibular flexure. J Prosthet Dent 1976;35:643-7. 
  19. Vagkopoulou T, Koutayas SO, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: Part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:130-51. 
  20. Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulou T, Pelekanos S, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidence-based clinical breakthrough. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:348-80. 
  21. Tischler M, Patch C, Bidra AS. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:204-9.