DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이산화탄소 배출량을 고려한 국내 컨테이너터미널 환경 효율성 분석

A Study on the Environmental Efficiency of the Container Terminals in South Korea Considering Carbon Dioxide Emissions

  • 심민섭 (국립한국해양대학교 해양콘텐츠융복합협동과정 물류시스템전공) ;
  • 김율성 (국립한국해양대학교 물류시스템공학과)
  • Min-Seop Sim (Department of Convergence Interdisciplinary Education, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Yul-Seong Kim (Logistics system engineering, Korea maritime and Ocean University)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.13
  • 심사 : 2024.03.04
  • 발행 : 2024.06.30

초록

전 세계적으로 기후변화에 대응하기 위하여 탈탄소화의 중요성이 강조되고 있으며, '2050 탄소중립'이 글로벌 의제로 부상하였다. 국내 항만공사는 정부의 탄소중립 추진과제에 맞추어 세계적인 탄소중립 규제 흐름에 동참하고 있다. 항만에서 탈탄소화가 중요하게 인식되기 시작하면서, 2010년대 이후로 유해산출물을 고려한 컨테이너터미널 효율성 분석이 다양하게 진행되고 있다. 하지만, 이산화탄소 배출량을 고려하여 국내 컨테이너터미널의 효율성을 비교분석한 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 또한, 대부분의 선행연구는 IPCC 가이드라인에서 제시하고 있는 Tier 1 기준에 따라 이산화탄소 배출량을 측정하였으며, Tier 3 기준에 따라 효율성을 분석한 연구는 미비한 상황이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 17개 국내 컨테이너터미널 운영사를 대상으로 Tier 3 방식 기준 이산화탄소 배출량 지표를 활용하여 효율성을 분석하였다. 그리고 DEA-SBM 모형과 Undesirable Outputs 모형 분석결과를 비교분석하여 유해산출물 고려 전후의 효율성 변화를 파악하였다.

Recently, there has been a global emphasis on decarbonization in order to address climate change and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. In line with government regulations, domestic port authorities have also started participating in this global agenda. Since 2010, when decarbonization became an important task in ports, there have been studies analyzing the environmental efficiency of container terminals, taking into account undesirable outputs. However, most of these previous studies only measured carbon dioxide emissions based on Tier 1, whereas this study is the first to analyze the environmental efficiency of South Korea's container terminals based on Tier 3, as presented in the IPCC guidelines. The study considered 17 container terminal operators in South Korea as decision-making units and used the DEA-SBM Model. Subsequently, an Undesirable Outputs Model was conducted to calculate the environmental efficiency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chang, Y. T.(2013), "Environmental efficiency of ports: a data envelopment analysis approach", Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 467-478. 
  2. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K.(2006) "Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References", Springer Science and Business Media. 
  3. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K.(2007), "Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models", references and DEA-solver software, Vol. 2. 
  4. IPCC(2021), "Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis" 
  5. Jung, K. O. and Chung, Y. K.(2004), "The pollution and economic growth based on the multi-country comparative analysis", Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 1077-1098. 
  6. Jung, K. S., Park, S. H., Lee, H. C., Kim Y. N. and Yeo, G. T.(2020), "A Study on the Efficiency of Container Terminal Considering Undesirable Variables", Journal of The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 509-531. 
  7. KMI(2009), "Port Areas: Response to the Climate Change Regime" 
  8. KMI(2021), "A Study on Carbon Reduction Effects following the Smartization of Maritime Ports -Focusing on Power Conversion-" 
  9. KMI(2022), "A Study on the Improvement of Carbon-neutral Port Management System" 
  10. Li, X., Kuang, H. and Hu, Y.(2019), "Carbon mitigation strategies of port selection and multimodal transport operations-A case study of northeast China", Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 18. 
  11. Liao, C. H., Tseng, P. H., Cullinane, K. and Lu, C. S.(2010), "The impact of an emerging port on the carbon dioxide emissions of inland container transport: An empirical study of Taipei port", Energy Policy, Vol. 38, No. 9, pp. 5251-5257. 
  12. Lin, Y., Yan, L. and Wang, Y. M.(2019), "Performance evaluation and investment analysis for container port sustainable development in china: An inverse DEA approach", Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 17. 
  13. Liu, Y. and Lee, C. B.(2019), "A Study on the structural changes of import & export containers between South Korea and Chines ports", Korea Logistics Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 1-12. 
  14. Liu, J., Wang, X. and Guo, J.(2021), "Port efficiency and its influencing factors in the context of Pilot Free Trade Zones", Transport Policy, Vol. 105, pp. 67-79. 
  15. Murphy, P. R., Dalenberg, D. R. and Daley, J. M.(1991), "Analyzing international water transportation: the perspectives of large US industrial corporations", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 169-190. 
  16. Nir, A. S., Lin, K. and Liang, G. S.(2003), "Port choice behaviour--from the perspective of the shipper", Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 165-173. 
  17. Park, C. M. and Kim, T. S.(2014), "A Study on the Efficiency of Logistics Industry in Korea using DEA-SBM", Korean Journal of Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 27-46. 
  18. Park, H. G.(2011), "The Efficiency of e-Logistics on the Global Logistics Providers Using the SBM Model", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 37-49. 
  19. Park, N. G.(2008), "An Empirical Measurement Way of Efficiency Prediction for Korean Seaports: SBM and Wilcoxson Signed-Rank Test Approach", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 313-327. 
  20. Shin, C. H. and Jeong, D. H.(2013), "Data envelopment analysis for container terminals considering an undesirable output-Focus on Busan port & Kwangyang port", Journal of navigation and port research, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 195-201. 
  21. Tai, H. H. and Hwang, C. C.(2005), "Analysis of hub port choice for container trunk lines in East Asia", Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 907-919. 
  22. Wang, C. N., Le, A. L. and Hou, C. C.(2019), "Applying undesirable output model to security evaluation of Taiwan", Mathematics, Vol. 7, No. 11. 
  23. Wiegmans, B. W., Hoest, A. V. D. and Notteboom, T. E.(2008), "Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators", Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 517-534.