International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shadow Libraries: A Bibliometric Analysis of Black Open Access Phenomenon (2011: 2023)

  • Received : 2024.05.05
  • Published : 2024.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzes the global literature on the black open-access phenomenon from 2011 to 2023. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database. The search strategy employed advanced queries with multiple synonymous terms to ensure exhaustive retrieval of relevant documents. The VOSviewer software was employed to visualize the co-occurrence networks. The findings reported 90 papers published during the study period. An evolving scholarly landscape was revealed, with heightened attention from 2016 onwards, peaking in 2017, 2021, and 2023. Articles constitute 83.3% of the total published documents. Singh and Srichandan are prolific authors, with 11.2% of the total publications. The United States contributes 18.9% of the papers, followed by India and Spain. Information Development and Scientometrics are pivotal journals in scholarly discussions about this scope, contributing 4.4% of publications. Co-occurrence network visualization revealed "Sci-Hub" and "open access" as the most used keywords in the global literature. The findings underscore the need for additional research to discover innovative business models to safeguard intellectual property rights while meeting researchers' evolving needs. The importance of this paper comes from being the first bibliometric study analyzing international literature related to this phenomenon, which provides a basis for future research efforts and policymaking.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The author extends her appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, KSA, for funding this research work through the project number "NBU-FFR-2024-2949-01"

References

  1. Sample I. (2012). Harvard University says it can't afford journal publishers' prices. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/apr/24/harvard-university-journal-publishers-prices
  2. Albert, K. M. (2006). Open access: Implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525322/
  3. Swanberg, S. M., Bulgarelli, N., & Thielen, J. (2020). Faculty knowledge and attitudes regarding predatory open access journals: A needs assessment study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(2), 208-218-218. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.849
  4. Sheikh, A., & Richardson, J. (2023). Open access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/01655515231202758
  5. Maddi, A. and Sapinho, D. (2023) 'On the culture of open access: The Sci-hub paradox', Scientometrics: An International Journal for all Quantitative Aspects of the Science of Science, Communication in Science and Science Policy, 128(10), pp. 5647-5658. doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04792-5
  6. Lawson, S. (2017). Access, ethics and piracy. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 30(1), 25-30. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1629/uksg.333
  7. Bohannon, J. (2016). Who's Downloading Pirated Papers? Everyone. Science, 352(6285), 508-512. https://search-ebscohost-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.24744838&site=eds-live
  8. Van der Sar, E. (2016b). RuTracker and Sci-Hub nominated for Free Knowledge Award. http://torrentfreak.com/rutracker-and-sci-hub-nominated-for-free-knowledge-award-160423
  9. Gonzalez-Solar, L., & Fernandez-Marcial, V. (2019). Sci-Hub, a challenge for academic and research libraries. 28(1). https://search-ebscohost-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edseli&AN=edseli.34165&site=eds-live
  10. Nicholas, D., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Xu, J., Herman, E., Clark, D., Abrizah, A., Rodriguez-Bravo, B., & Swigon, M. (2019). Sci-Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front. Learned Publishing, 32(2), 147-153-153. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/leap.1206
  11. Cabanac, G. (2016). Bibliogifts in LibGen? A study of a text-sharing platform driven by biblioleaks and crowdsourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 874-884-884. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/asi.23445
  12. The Guardian. (2023). Four large US publishers sue shadow library for alleged copyright infringement. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/sep/15/four-large-us-publishers-sue-shadow-library-for-alleged-copyright-infringement
  13. Novo, L. A. B., & Onishi, V. C. (2017). Could Sci-Hub become a quicksand for authors?. Information Development, 33(3), 324-325-325. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0266666917703638
  14. Strielkowski, W. (2017). Will the rise of Sci-Hub pave the road for the subscription-based access to publishing databases?. Information Development, 33(5), 540-542-542. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0266666917728674
  15. Zimerman, M. (2011). E-books and piracy: Implications/issues for academic libraries. New Library World, 112(1-2), 67-75-75. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1108/03074801111100463
  16. Bohannon, J. (2016). The frustrated science student behind Sci-Hub. Science, 352(6285), 511. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6285.511
  17. Machin-Mastromatteo, J.-D., Uribe-Tirado, A., & Romero-Ortiz, M. E. (2016). Piracy of scientific papers in Latin America: An analysis of Sci-Hub usage data = La pirateria de articulos cientificos en Latinoamerica: Un analisis de los datos de uso de Sci-Hub. 32(5), 1806-1814. https://doiorg.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0266666916671080
  18. Greshake, B. (2017). Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage. F1000Research, 6. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.12688/f1000research.11366.1
  19. Himmelstein, D. S., Greene, C. S., Romero, A. R., Levernier, J. G., Munro, T. A., McLaughlin, S. R., & Greshake Tzovaras, B. (2018). Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature. ELife, 7. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.7554/eLife.32822
  20. Bodo, B., Antal, D., & Puha, Z. (2020). Can scholarly pirate libraries bridge the knowledge access gap? An empirical study on the structural conditions of book piracy in global and European academia. PLoS ONE, 15. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242509
  21. Luczaj, K., & Holy-Luczaj, M. (2020). How academics outside global research centers challenge limitations in access to scholarly literature. Portal, 20(4), 715-731-731. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1353/PLA.2020.0034
  22. Behboudi, E., Shamsi, A., & Bueno de la Fuente, G. (2021). The black crow of science and its impact: analyzing Sci-Hub use with Google Trends. LIBRARY HI TECH, 39(4), 970-983. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1108/LHT-04-2020-0105
  23. Singh, V. K., Srichandan, S. S., & Bhattacharya, S. (2021). What do Indian Researchers download from Sci-Hub. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.10.2.4
  24. Segado-Boj, F., Martin-Quevedo, J., & Prieto-Gutierrez, J.-J. (2022). Jumping over the paywall: Strategies and motivations for scholarly piracy and other alternatives. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/02666669221144429
  25. Correa, J. C., Laverde-Rojas, H., Tejada, J., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2022). The Sci-Hub effect on papers' citations. Scientometrics: An International Journal for All Quantitative Aspects of the Science of Science, Communication in Science and Science Policy, 127(1), 99-126. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03806-w
  26. Buehling, K., Geissler, M., & Strecker, D. (2022). Free access to scientific literature and its influence on the publishing activity in developing countries: The effect of Sci-Hub in the field of mathematics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(9), 1336-1355-1355. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/asi.24636
  27. Amin, R., Ayoub, A., Amin, S., & Wani, Z. A. (2021). Toll-based access vs pirate access: a webometric study of academic publishers. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(1), 33-44. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1108/DLP-12-2020-0127
  28. Gardner, G. J., McLaughlin, S. R., & Asher, A. D. (2017). Shadow Libraries and You: Sci-Hub Usage and the Future of ILL. https://search-ebscohost-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edseli&AN=edseli.30981&site=eds-live