DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detection of microbial organisms on Apis mellifera L. beehives in palm garden, Eastern Thailand

  • Sirikwan Dokuta (School of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Sumed Yadoung (Environmental Sciences Program, Faculty of Sciences, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Peerapong Jeeno (School of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Sayamon Hongjaisee (School of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Phadungkiat Khamnoi (Microbiology Unit, Diagnostic Laboratory, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Khanchai Danmek (School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao) ;
  • Jakkrawut Maitip (Faculty of Science, Energy and Environment, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Rayong Campus) ;
  • Bajaree Chuttong (Meliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Surat Hongsibsong (School of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University)
  • Received : 2023.10.10
  • Accepted : 2023.12.11
  • Published : 2024.03.31

Abstract

Background: Honey bees play a crucial role in pollination and ecological balance. Apis mellifera L. colonies, especially those located in specific geographic regions, such as the palm garden in Eastern Thailand, are susceptible to potential threats from microbial contaminants. Understanding and detecting microbial organisms in these beehives is essential for the preservation of bee health, honey production, and the broader ecosystem. However, the problem of microbial infection and antibiotic-resistant bacteria is more severe and continuously increasing, resulting in a health, economic, and social crisis. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of microorganisms in A. mellifera beehives in palm gardens in Rayong province, Eastern Thailand. Results: Ten swabs in transport media were swabbed and obtained from different parts of each beehive (1 swab per beehive), for a total of 10 hives. Traditional microbial culture-based methods, biochemical tests, and antimicrobial susceptibility (disc-diffusion) tests were used to detect microbial organisms and antibiotic resistance in bacteria. The swab tests from nine beehives resulted in the detection of Gram-positive bacteria (63.64%), Gram-negative bacteria (27.27%), and fungi/yeast (9.09%). These microorganisms are classified as a group of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. and made up 40.91% of the bacteria discovered. Other bacteria found were Coryneform bacteria (13.64%), Pantoea spp. (13.64%), Bacillus spp. (9.09%), yeast (9.09%), glucose non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli (9.09%), and Pseudomonas spp. (4.55%). However, due to the traditional culture-based and 0biochemical tests usually used to identify the microbial organisms in clinical specimens and the limitation of identifying some environmental microbial species, the results of the antimicrobial susceptibility test cannot reveal if the organism is resistant or susceptible to the drug. Nevertheless, drug-sensitive inhibition zones were formed with each antibiotic agent. Conclusions: Overall, the study supports prevention, healthcare, and public health systems. The contamination of microorganisms in the beehives may affect the quality of honey and other bee products or even the health of the beekeeper. To avoid this kind of contamination, it is therefore necessary to wear personal protective equipment while harvesting honey and other bee products.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

All laboratory facilities were supported by RIHES, CMU and Microbiology Unit, Diagnostic Laboratory, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

References

  1. Anderson KE, Carroll MJ, Sheehan T, Lanan MC, Mott BM, Maes P, et al. Hive-stored pollen of honey bees: many lines of evidence are consistent with pollen preservation, not nutrient conversion. Mol Ecol. 2014;23(23):5904-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12966.
  2. Becker K, Heilmann C, Peters G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(4):870-926. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00109-13.
  3. Bell RL, Jarvis KG, Ottesen AR, McFarland MA, Brown EW. Recent and emerging innovations in Salmonella detection: a food and environmental perspective. Microb Biotechnol. 2016;9(3):279-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12359.
  4. Clinical and Labortory Standaras Institute. M45 Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently Isolated or fastidious bacteria. 3rd ed. Wayne: Clinical and Labortory Standaras Institute; 2015.
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100 performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 32nd ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2022.
  6. Dadgostar P. Antimicrobial resistance: implications and costs. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:3903-10. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S234610.
  7. Foote HL. Possible use of microorganisms in synthetic bee bread production. Am Bee J. 1957;97:476-8.
  8. Haydak MH. Pollen-pollen substitutes-beebread. Am Bee J. 1958;98(4):145-6.
  9. Holzel CS, Tetens JL, Schwaiger K. Unraveling the role of vegetables in spreading antimicrobial-resistant bacteria: a need for quantitative risk assessment. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2018;15(11):671-88. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2018.2501.
  10. Khalifa SAM, Elshafiey EH, Shetaia AA, El-Wahed AAA, Algethami AF, Musharraf SG, et al. Overview of bee pollination and its economic value for crop production. Insects. 2021;12(8):688. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080688.
  11. Lannutti L, Gonzales FN, Dus Santos MJ, Florin-Christensen M, Schnittger L. Molecular detection and differentiation of arthropod, fungal, protozoan, bacterial and viral pathogens of honeybees. Vet Sci. 2022;9(5):221. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050221.
  12. Layla S, Darweesh M. Prevelance and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Pantoea spp. isolated form clinical and environmental sources in Iraq. Int J ChemTech Res. 2016;9(8):430-7.
  13. LibreText. Kirby-Bauer Disk Susceptibility Test. 2023. https://bio.libretexts.org/. Accessed 29 Nov 2023.
  14. McAfee A. The Surprisingly Sophisticated Ways That Honey Bees Fight Disease. 2020. https://americanbeejournal.com/the-surprisingly-sophisticated-ways-that-honey-bees-fight-disease/. Accessed 22 Sep 2023.
  15. Nguyen AT, Tallent SM. Screening food for Bacillus cereus toxins using whole genome sequencing. Food Microbiol. 2019;78:164-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2018.10.008.
  16. Sandot A, Grall N, Rodier T, Bunel V, Godet C, Weisenburger G, et al. Risk of bronchial complications after lung transplantation with respiratory corynebacteria. Results From a Monocenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Transpl Int. 2023;36:10942. https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.10942.
  17. Saravanan A, Kumar PS, Hemavathy RV, Jeevanantham S, Kamalesh R, Sneha S, et al. Methods of detection of food-borne pathogens: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2021;19:189-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01072-z.
  18. Serwecinska L. Antimicrobials and antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a risk to the environment and to public health. Water. 2020;12(12):3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123313.
  19. Yadav SK, Bhujel R, Mishra SK, Sharma S, Sherchand JB. Emergence of multidrug-resistant non-fermentative gram negative bacterial infection in hospitalized patients in a tertiary care center of Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):319. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05163-6.