Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Preliminary Study on the Adoption of Structured Abstracts by Korean Library and Information Science Journals

국내 문헌정보학 분야 학술지에 구조적 초록을 도입하기 위한 예비 연구

  • 이재윤 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.04.22
  • Accepted : 2024.05.13
  • Published : 2024.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is a preliminary study to consider the introduction of structured abstracts to Korean journals in the field of library and information science (LIS). To achieve this, we first identified examples of overseas LIS journals that have adopted structured abstracts, and analyzed the occurrence statistics of each section of structured abstracts for four journals published by Emerald Publishing that emphasize the value of research and practical/social implications sections. Considering the inherent drawback of longer abstracts, we examined the abstract policies and the abstract lengths of recently published articles of four Korean LIS journals. Additionally, we identified some cases where essential elements were missing from the Korean abstracts. Finally, a proposal for the adoption of structured abstracts for Korean LIS journals was presented, focusing on the length of abstracts and the organization of sections. It is expected that the adoption of the proposed structured abstract format will facilitate the utilization of Korean LIS research in the library and information management practice.

이 논문은 구조적 초록 형식을 국내 문헌정보학 분야 학술지에 도입할 것을 검토하기 위한 예비 연구이다. 이를 위해서 구조적 초록을 도입한 해외 문헌정보학 분야 학술지 사례를 파악한 후, 연구의 가치와 실무적/사회적 의의 섹션을 강조하는 Emerald 출판사 발행 학술지 중 4종을 대상으로 구조적 초록을 구성하는 각 섹션별 사용 통계를 구체적으로 분석해보았다. 구조적 초록을 도입하면 초록의 길이가 길어지는 단점을 감안해서 국내 문헌정보학 분야 학술지 4종의 초록 관련 규정과 최근 게재된 초록 길이를 살펴보았다. 아울러 국문초록의 구성요소 현황을 분석하여 필수 요소가 일부 초록에서 누락되는 경우를 확인하였다. 마지막으로 국내 문헌정보학 학술지를 위한 구조적 초록 도입 방안을 초록의 길이와 섹션 구성 위주로 제시하였다. 제안된 구조적 초록 형식을 도입한다면 국내 문헌정보학 연구의 도서관 및 정보관리 실무 활용이 더욱 활발해질 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, Hye-Rhan (1996). An analysis of current states and information content of author abstracts in the field of social sciences. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 30(1), 35-48.
  2. Choi, Sanghee & Lee, Jae Yun (2012). Usability analysis of structured abstracts in journal articles for document clustering. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(1), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.331
  3. Chung, Jae-Young & Park, Jin-Hee (2011). Analysis of the trends in the field studies of library and information science in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2), 171-191. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.171
  4. Jang, Su Hyun & Nam, Young Joon (2022). A study on the research trends on literacy in library and information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(3), 263-292. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.3.263
  5. Jang, Yeonmi & Lee, Jae Yun (2024). Acknowledgement types and bibliometric characteristics of library and information science journal articles. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 41(1), 313-338. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2024.41.1.313
  6. Jeong, Yoo Kyung (2022). Overlap analysis of research areas in four library and information science journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 40(4), 259-277. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2023.40.4.259
  7. Kang, In-Seo & Kim, Hea-Jin (2020). Analysis of 'digital divide' research trends in library and information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(2), 333-352. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.333
  8. Lee, Jae Yun (2023). A study on scholarly communication trends in Korean library and information science studies through author group analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(2), 409-434. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.2.409
  9. Lee, Jongwook, Kim, Soojung, & Oh, Sanghee (2023). Perceptions of academic journals and scholarly events in library and information science: An online survey. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(1), 365-386. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.1.365
  10. Yun, Jihye & Jeong, Yoo Kyung (2022). A study of information literacy curriculum using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(4), 1-21. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.4.001
  11. Almugbel, Z., El Haggar, N., & Bugshan, N. (2019). Automatic structured abstract for research papers supported by tabular format using NLP. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(2), 233-240.
  12. Bayley, L. & Eldredge, J. (2003). The structured abstract: an essential tool for researchers. Hypothesis, 17(1), 11-13.
  13. Booth, A. & O'Rourke, A. J. (1997). The value of structured abstracts in information retrieval from MEDLINE. Health Libraries Review, 14(3), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2532.1997.1430157.x
  14. Chalmers, I. (1996). Structured abstracts in The Lancet. The Lancet, 347, 340.
  15. Cleveland, D. B. & Cleveland, A. D. (2013). Introduction to Indexing and Abstracting. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  16. Emerald Publishing [n.d.]. How to... write an article abstract. Available: https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/how-to/authoring-editing-reviewing/write-article-abstract [Retrieved at 2007.8.27]
  17. Emerald structured abstracts have arrived! (2005). Journal of Documentation, 61(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/jd.2005.27861baa.002
  18. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (n.d.). Instructions for authors. Available: https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/guidelines
  19. Falagas, M. E. & Vergidis, P. I. (2004). Addressing the limitations of structured abstracts. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141(7), 576-577.
  20. Guimaraes, C. A. (2006). Structured abstracts: narrative review. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, 21(4), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-86502006000400014
  21. Hafeez, D. M., Jalal, S., & Khosa, F. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of manuscript characteristics that influence citations: a comparison of six major psychiatry journals. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 108, 90-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.07.010
  22. Hartley, J. & Betts, L. (2009). Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2010-2018.
  23. Hartley, J. & Ganier. F. (2000). Which do you prefer? Some observations on preference measures in studies of structured abstracts. European Science Editing, 26, 4-7.
  24. Hartley, J. (1998). Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? Journal of Information Science, 24(5), 359-364.
  25. Hartley, J. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology: the case for structure. Science Communication, 24(3), 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547002250301
  26. Hartley, J. (2004). Current findings from research on structured abstracts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(3), 368-371.
  27. Hartley, J. (2014). Current findings from research on structured abstracts: an update. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 102(3), 146-148. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.002
  28. Hartley, J., Sydes, M., & Blurton, A. (1996). Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient? Journal of Information Science, 22(5), 349-356.
  29. Hashimoto, K. & Inoue, U. (2020). Automatic generation of structured abstracts from research papers by using deep learning, Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 424-429, https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI50415.2020.00092
  30. Haynes, R. B., Mulrow, C. D., Huth, E. J., Altman, D. G., & Gardner, M. J. (1990). More informative abstracts revisited. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-69
  31. Health Information and Libraries Journal (2022). Author guidelines. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/14711842/homepage/forauthors.html
  32. Heller, M. B. (1991). Structured abstracts: a modest dissent. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(8), 739-740.
  33. Holosko, M. J. (2009). Enhancing practitioner knowledge through a unique abstracting format used with research on social work practice journal articles. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(2), 234-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731508320194
  34. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2024). Preparing a manuscript for submission to a medical journal. Available: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/manuscript-preparation/preparing-for-submission.html
  35. Journal of the Medical Library Association (2022). Submissions. Available: https://jmla.mlanet.org/ojs/jmla/about/submissions
  36. Kelly, A. E. & Yin, R. K. (2007). Strengthening structured abstracts for education research: the need for claim-based structured abstracts. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07300356
  37. Kim, E. (2016). Abstracts in medical science journals: an analysis of subheadings in structured abstracts. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.1.201603.199
  38. Kostoff, R. N. & Hartley, J. (2002). Open letter to technical journal editors regarding structured abstracts: this letter proposes that structured abstracts be required for all technical journal articles. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800308
  39. Mosteller, F., Nave, B., & Miech, E. J. (2004). Why we need a structured abstract in education research. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 29-34.
  40. Nakayama, T., Hirai, N., Yamazaki, S., & Naito, M. (2005). Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 237-242.
  41. Nam, S., Jeong, S., Kim, S.-K., Kim, H.-K., & Ngo, V. (2016). Structuralizing biomedical abstracts with discriminative linguistic features. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 79(1), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.10.026
  42. National Library of Medicine (2015). Structured abstracts. Available: https://lhncbc.nlm.nih.gov/ii/areas/structured-abstracts.html
  43. Nundy, S., Kakar, A., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2022). How to write an abstract?. In: How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries?. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5248-6_15
  44. Oh, H., Nam, S., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles: Summarization using full-text section information. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(2), 234-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24727
  45. Ripple, A. M., Mork, J. G., Knecht, L. S., & Humphreys, B. L. (2011). A retrospective cohort study of structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1992-2006. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(2), 160-163. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.2.009
  46. Sollaci, L. B. & Pereira, M. G. (2004). The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(3), 364-367.
  47. Stevenson, H. A. & Harrison. J. E. (2009). Structured abstracts: do they improve citation retrieval from dental journals? Journal of Orthodontics, 36(1), 52-60.
  48. The Editors (2004). Addressing the limitations of structured abstracts. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140(6), 480-481.
  49. Wilson, T. D. (2004) Editorial. Information Research, 10(2), editorial E102. Available: https://informationr.net/ir/10-2/editor102.html 10-2/editor102.html
  50. Wilson, T. D. (2022). Instructions on the submission of papers to Information Research. Available: https://informationr.net/ir/author2.html