Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods

The Korean Statistical Society (한국통계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the Bayesian nonparametric model for predicting group health claims

  • Muna Mauliza (Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University) ;
  • Jimin Hong (Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University)
  • Received : 2023.09.07
  • Accepted : 2023.12.26
  • Published : 2024.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The accurate forecasting of insurance claims is a critical component for insurers' risk management decisions. Hierarchical Bayesian parametric (BP) models can be used for health insurance claims forecasting, but they are unsatisfactory to describe the claims distribution. Therefore, Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) models can be a more suitable alternative to deal with the complex characteristics of the health insurance claims distribution, including heavy tails, skewness, and multimodality. In this study, we apply both a BP model and a BNP model to predict group health claims using simulated and real-world data for a private life insurer in Indonesia. The findings show that the BNP model outperforms the BP model in terms of claims prediction accuracy. Furthermore, our analysis highlights the flexibility and robustness of BNP models in handling diverse data structures in health insurance claims.

Keywords

References

  1. Albert J (2009). Bayesian Computation with R, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin/Heidelberg.
  2. Blackwell D and MacQueen J (1973). Ferguson distributions via Polya Urn schemes, The Annals of Statistics, 1, 353-355.
  3. Buhlmann H and Gisler A (2005). A Course in Credibility Theory and Its Applications, Springer, Berlin.
  4. Cheng N and Yuan T (2013). Nonparametric Bayesian lifetime data analysis using Dirichlet process lognormal mixture model, Naval Research Logistics, 60, 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21529
  5. Fellingham GW, Kottas A, and Hartman BM (2015). Bayesian nonparametric predictive modeling of group health claims, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 60, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.10.011
  6. Ferguson TS (1973). A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems, The Annals of Statistics, 1, 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176342360
  7. Forbes C, Evans M, Hastings N, and Peacock B (2011). Statistical Distributions, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  8. Gilks WR, Richardson S, and Spiegelhalter DJ (1995). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Florida.
  9. Hong L, Kuffner T, and Martin R (2016, December 10). On prediction of future insurance claims when the model is uncertain, SSRN Electronic Journal, Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2883574
  10. Hong L and Martin R (2017). A flexible Bayesian nonparametric model for predicting future insurance claims, North American Actuarial Journal, 21, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2016.1247720
  11. Huang Y and Meng S (2020). A Bayesian nonparametric model and its application in insurance loss prediction, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 93, 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.010
  12. Kottas A (2006). Nonparametric Bayesian survival analysis using mixtures of Weibull distributions, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136, 578-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2004.08.009
  13. MacEachern SN (2016). Nonparametric Bayesian methods: A gentle introduction and overview, Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 23, 445-466. https://doi.org/10.5351/CSAM.2016.23.6.445
  14. Muller P, Erkanli A, and West M (1996). Bayesian curve fitting using multivariate normal mixtures, Biometrika, 83, 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/83.1.67
  15. Richardson R and Hartman B (2018). Bayesian nonparametric regression models for modeling and predicting healthcare claims, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 83, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2018.06.002
  16. Sethuraman J (1994). A constructive definition of Dirichlet priors, Statistica Sinica, 4, 639-650.
  17. Zehnwirth B (1979). Credibility and the Dirichlet process, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.1979.10413706