DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shaking Table Test to Verify the Seismic Performance of Nuclear Electric Components

원자력 전기기기 부품의 내진성능 확인을 위한 진동대 실험

  • Chang, Sung Jin (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeon, Bub Gyu (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Dong Uk (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung Wan (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University)
  • 장성진 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 전법규 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 박동욱 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 김성완 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터)
  • Received : 2023.11.23
  • Accepted : 2024.02.26
  • Published : 2024.05.01

Abstract

Earthquakes of magnitude 3.0 or greater occur in Korea about 10 times on average yearly, and the number of earthquakes occurring in Korea is increasing. As many earthquakes have recently occurred, interest in the safety of nuclear power plants has increased. Nuclear power plants are equipped with many cabinet-type control facilities to regulate safety facilities, and function maintenance is required during an earthquake. The seismic performance of the cabinet is divided into structural and functional performances. Structural performance can be secured during the design procedure. Functional performance depends on the vibration performance of the component. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm the seismic performance of the components. Generally, seismic performance is confirmed through seismic simulation tests. When checking seismic performance through seismic simulation tests, it is difficult to determine the effect of frequency and maximum acceleration on an element. In this paper, shaking table tests were performed using various frequencies and various maximum accelerations. The seismic performance characteristics of the functions of electrical equipment components were confirmed through tests.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 산업통상자원부(MOTIE)와 한국에너지기술평가원(KETEP)의 지원을 받아 수행한 연구과제(설계초과 강진 대비 열화기기 지진안전성향상 및 내진보강기술개발, No. 20224B10200080)입니다

References

  1. Chang SJ, Park DU, Jeong YS. Evaluation of MCC seismic response according to frequency contents by shake table test. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2021;53(4):1345-1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.10.002
  2. Jeong YS, Chang SJ, Kim SW, Park JH, Park DU. Fragility comparison of battery chargers for nuclear power plants depending on reinforcement of supporting for massive componennts. Trans Korean Soc Noise Vib Eng. 2023;33(3):264-272. https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVE.2023.33.3.264
  3. Lee GH, Kim JM, Kim SY. Seismic retrofitting of cabinet structures in nuclear power plant. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2003 Aug;7(4): 31-37. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2003.7.4.031
  4. Lee GH, Ha DH. The Optimum Damping Retrofit for Cablnet Structures of NPP by µ-GA. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2005 Feb; 9(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2005.9.1.001
  5. EPRI. Guidelines for Development of In-Cabinet Seimic Demand for Devices Mounted in Electrical Cabinets. NP-7146-SL R1. Woburn; c1995.
  6. Cho SG, So G, Han M, Kim D. Comparative evaluation of in-cabinet amplification factor for devices mounted in electrical cabinets. Proceeding of KNS 2016 Autumn Meeting; 2016 Oct 26-28; Gyeongju. Korea Nuclear Society; c2016.
  7. Gupta A, Yang SK, Gupta AK. Ritz vector approach for evaluating incabinet response spectra. Nucl Eng Des. 1999;217:49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00133-4
  8. Richards J, Merz K, Hardy G. High frequency seismic testing of potentially sensitivity components. SMiRT-23; 2015 Aug 10-14; Manchester, UK. IASMiRT; c2015.
  9. Tseng YD, Chang WF, Gau YC. A relay fragility test experience of nuclear power plant in Taiwan. SMiRT-23; 2015 Aug 10-14; Manchester, UK. IASMiRT; c2015.
  10. ANSI/IEEE C37.98. IEEE standard seismic testing of relays; c1987.