DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Impact of Medical Humanities Curriculum with Flipped-Learning on Students of Korean Medical School

Flipped learning을 활용한 의료인문학 수업의 한의학과 학생에 대한 영향

  • Jeong Aram (Dept. of Pediatrics, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University) ;
  • Jeong Yehun (School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee Hye-Yoon (Division of Humanities and Social Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University)
  • 정아람 (가천대학교 한의과대학 한방소아과교실) ;
  • 정예훈 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원) ;
  • 이혜윤 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원 인문사회의학교실)
  • Received : 2024.03.21
  • Accepted : 2024.04.12
  • Published : 2024.04.30

Abstract

Objectives : The aim of this study was to identify the effect of Medical humanities curriculum on students of Korean medical school in terms of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor level of humanities skill. Methods : The course was taught to second- and third-year Korean medicine students. The classes were held eight times a semester for second-year students and 9 times for third-year students, and each class was held once a week for 2 hours. Formative and summative assessments, group and individual assignments, and peer assessments were conducted to evaluate educational effectiveness, as well as basic lecture evaluations and satisfaction surveys. Results : Most of the students who took Medical humanities showed a performance rate of more than 60-70% in the cognitive aspect, and the total score was 14.48 with a standard deviation of 2.70 in the knowledge application stage. In terms of class satisfaction, students in Medical humanities I were more satisfied with the evaluation criteria and class management expertise, while students in Medical humanities II were most satisfied with the class organization, with an average score of 4.86/5. Conclusions : It was confirmed that students' humanities improved in cognitive, affective, and psychological aspects after medical humanities courses, and future research should be conducted on the long-term educational effects of medical humanities, effective teaching methods, and evaluation methods.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 과제는 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음

References

  1. Hooker C. The medical humanities - a brief introduction. Australian Family Physician. 2008;37(5):369-70.
  2. Huang, S., Ho, CC., Chu, YR. et al. The quantified analysis of the correlation between medical humanities curriculums and medical students' performance. BMC Medical Education. 2023;571(23):1-8.
  3. Kim JH, Lee HA. The trend and prospect of medical sociology: Its concepts and the interface with medical history. Uisahak. 2020;29(3):843-902.
  4. Carr SE, Noya F. Phillips B, Harris A, Scott K, Hooker C, Mavaddat N, Ani-Amponsah M, Vuillermin D, Reid S, Brett-Maclean P. Health humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):568.
  5. Ousager J, Johannessen H. Humanities in undergraduate medical education: a literature review. Academic Medicine. 2010;85(6):988-98. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dd226b
  6. Kwon SO. Conception of medical humanities and it's role in medical education. Korean Medical Education. 2005;17(3).
  7. Mehta NB, Hull AL, Young JB, Stoller JK. Just imagine: new paradigms for medical education. Academic Medicine. 2013;88(10):1418-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a36a07
  8. Ramnanan CJ, Pound LD. Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Advances in Medical Education Practice. 2017;8:63-73. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S109037
  9. Ilic D, Nordin RB, Glasziou P, Tilson JK, Villanueva EA. Randomised controlled trial of a blended learning evaluation intervention for teaching evidencebased medicine. BMC Medical Education. 2015;15:39.
  10. Oh HJ. A case study on application of flipped learning in medical humanities: focus on instructional design and learners' perspective. Journal of Science Education. 2020;44(2):240-58. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2020.44.2.240
  11. Choi JB, Kim EG. Developing a teaching-learning model for flipped learning for institutes of technology and a case of operation of a subject. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 2015;18(2):77-88.
  12. Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, Reed VA. The Kirkpatrick model: A useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability. 2009;34(3):266-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250903093125
  13. Kang SI, Medical Odyssey, Yuksabipyoungsa, 1th edition, 2022. p167.
  14. Kang SI, Medical Odyssey, Yuksabipyoungsa, 1th edition, 2022. p193.
  15. Park KH, Lee SY, Im S, Yune SJ. The mediator effect of learning ethics consciousness on the relationship between the personality and patient safety attitude of medical students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2020;20(17):1187-203.
  16. Kim JB. A Study on the aspects of peer evaluation in team-based learning. Korean Journal of General Education. 2014;8(5):157-83.
  17. Yang JW. The effect of flip learning method on self-directed learning ability, Critical thinking Disposition, and Academic Selfefficacy of Nursing Students. Journal of The Korea Convergence Society. 2021;11(112):467-73.
  18. Jong MS, Chen G, Tam V, Chai CS. Adoption of flipped learning in social humanities education: the FIBER experience in secondary schools, Interactive Learning Environments. 2019;27(8):1222-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1561473
  19. Kim MY, Kim MY. An Analysis on perception of the satisfaction with university liberal education and learning outcomes. Korean Journal of General Education. 2020;14(1):193-218.
  20. Jun JS, Kim S. Validating an evaluation model to measure the effectiveness of educational programs of lifelong education centers affiliated with universities. Journal of Educational Studies. 2011;42(1):125-50.