대한조선학회논문집 (Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea)

  • 제61권2호
  • /
  • Pages.88-97
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1225-1143(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7355(eISSN)
대한조선학회 (The Society of Naval Architects of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

FuelEU Maritime 규제 적용에 따른 해양 연료의 영향분석 및 대응방안 연구

A Study on Impact and Countermeasures of Marine Fuels in the FuelEU Maritime Regulation

  • 김진형 (한국해양대학교 대학원 기관시스템공학과) ;
  • 최재혁 (한국해양대학교 기관시스템공학부)
  • Jin-Hyung Kim (Department of Marine Systems Engineering, Graduate School, Korea Maritime & Ocean University) ;
  • Jae-Hyuk Choi (Division of Marine System Engineering, Korea Maritime & Ocean University)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.05
  • 심사 : 2024.02.15
  • 발행 : 2024.04.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study performed the analysis on an economic feasibility of each marine fuel, potential fuel pathways and the relevance of compliance measures to ensure compliance with the FuelEU Maritime regulation. Additionally, it identified certain regulatory gaps to encourage the use of alternative marine fuels. Regarding GHG emissions calculations, the existing GHG regulations for ships applies the Tank-to-Wake (TtW) method, whereas FuelEU Maritime applies the Well-to-Wake (WtW) method. The main results present that important information to establish response strategy for FuelEU Maritime including the costs and benefits of each marine fuel, the minimum blending ratio of alternative fules, and compliance impacts of measures. For the regulatory costs and benefits of marine fuels following the implementation of the FuelEU Maritime from 2025, our findings indicate that while most fossil fuels incur regulatory costs from 2025, most of biofuels and RFNBO fuels do not incur costs until 2050. This will play a role to narrow the price gap between fossil fuels and alternative fuels.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 산업통상자원부 및 산업기술평가관리원(KEIT)의 연구비 지원에 의한 연구임('20016140').

참고문헌

  1. Christodoulou, A. and Cullinane, K., 2022. Potential alternative fuel pathways for compliance with the 'FuelEU Maritime Initiative'. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, pp.103492.
  2. Council of the European Union, 2022. Fit for 55, URL: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/fit-for-55-the-eu-plan-for-a-green-transition/ [Accessed 20 December 2023].
  3. European Parliament and Council, 2015. Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European parliament and of the couoncilof 29 April 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC.
  4. European Parliament and Council, 2018. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European parliament and of the council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast).
  5. European Parliament and Council, 2023. Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 of the European parliament and of the council of 13 September 2023 on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC.
  6. European Commission, 2020. Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1044 of 8 May 2020 supplementing regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European parliament and of the council with regard to values for global warming potentials and the inventory guidelines and with regard to the Union inventory system and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 666/2014.
  7. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014. 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working group I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
  8. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2020. Fourth IMO GHG Study. London: IMO.
  9. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2023a. Revised GHG reduction strategy for global shipping adopted, URL: https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/Revised-GHG-reduction-strategy-for-global-shipping-adopted-.aspx [Accessed 20 December 2023].
  10. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2023b. MEPC.1/Circ.905, Interim Guidance on the use of biofuels under regulations 26, 27 and 28 of MARPOL Annex VI (DCS and CII).
  11. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2022. ISWG-GHG 11/2/3, Updated draft Lifecycle GHG and Carbon Intensity Guidelines for marine fuels.
  12. Kim, J.H., 2022. EU's new GHG regulations for international shipping - latest trends and impacts of EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime. SNAKZINE, 59(6), pp.16-19.
  13. Kramel, D., Muri, H., Kim, Y., Lonka, R., Nielsen, J.B., Ringvold, A.L., Bouman, E.A., Steen, S. and Stromman, A.H., 2021. Global shipping emissions from a well-to-wake perspective: The MariTEAM model. Environmental Science & Technology, 55, pp.15040-15050. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03937
  14. Lindstad, E., Lagemann, B., Rialland, A., Gamlem, G.M. and Valland, A., 2021. Reduction of maritime GHG emissions and the potential role of e-fuels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 101, pp. 103075.
  15. Solakivi, T., Paimander, A. and Ojala, L., 2022. Cost competitiveness of alternative maritime fuels in the new regulatory framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 113, pp.103500.