문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제10권2호
  • /
  • Pages.565-574
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

챗GPT 리터러시가 학업열의에 미치는 영향: 학업자신감과 지각된 학업역량의 이중매개효과를 중심으로

The Influence of ChatGPT Literacy on Academic Engagement: Focusing on the Serial Mediation Effect of Academic Confidence and Perceived Academic Competence

  • 이은성 (성균관대학교 미디어커뮤니케이션학과) ;
  • 전용철 (성균관대학교 미디어커뮤니케이션학과)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.30
  • 심사 : 2024.03.05
  • 발행 : 2024.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

챗GPT는 우리 사회의 모든 분야에 커다란 반향을 일으키고 있으며, 이는 교육 분야에서도 마찬가지이다. 하지만 학교 현장에서의 챗GPT에 관한 학계 및 사회적 논의는 주로 표절과 같은 부정행위에 초점이 맞춰져있으며, 학생들의 인공지능 기술 활용으로 인한 긍정적인 효과에 대해서는 상대적으로 연구가 부족한 실정이다. 그와 더불어, 코로나 시대의 교육 위기 속에서 학업열의를 증진시키는 연구의 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 이러한 문제인식에 따라 우리는 학생들의 챗GPT 리터러시 수준에 따라 학업열의가 어떻게 나타나는지에 대해 알아보고, 그 과정에서 학생들의 학업 자신감 및 지각된 학업역량이 매개효과를 나타내는지를 확인했다. 이를 위해 406명의 대학생을 대상으로 수집한 데이터를 SPSS로 분석했다. 그 결과, 챗GPT 리터러시는 학업열의에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것이 확인되었으며, 학업자신감은 챗GPT 리터러시와 학업열의 사이를 매개했다. 또한 학업자신감과 지각된 학업역량은 이중으로 매개되었을 때 유의한 결과를 도출했다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 우리는 챗GPT 리터러시와 학업열의 사이의 이론적 매커니즘을 명확히 규명할 수 있다는 이론적 함의를 논하였다. 또한 이와 관련하여 챗GPT 리터러시 교육의 중요성에 관한 실용적 함의에 대해도 기술하였다.

ChatGPT is causing significant reverberations across all sectors of our society, and this holds true for the field of education as well. However, scholarly and societal discussions regarding ChatGPT in academic settings have primarily focused on issues such as plagiarism, with relatively limited research on the positive effects of utilizing generative AI. Additionally, amidst the educational crisis of the post-COVID era, there is a growing recognition of the need to enhance academic engagement. In light of these concerns, we investigated how academic engagement varies based on students' levels of ChatGPT literacy and examined whether students' academic confidence and perceived academic competence serve as mediators between ChatGPT literacy and academic engagement. An analysis using SPSS was conducted on the data collected from 406 college students. The results showed that ChatGPT literacy had a positive effect on academic engagement, and academic confidence mediated the relationship between ChatGPT literacy and academic engagement. Also, when the mediating effect of perceived academic competence was significant only when it was serially mediated. Based on these findings, we discussed the theoretical contributions of identifying the theoretical mechanism between ChatGPT literacy and academic engagement. In addition, practical implications regarding the importance of ChatGPT literacy education were described.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. KPMG, "ChatGPT and generative AI-driven big tech platform innovation" https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/kr/pdf/2023/issue-monitor/kpmg-korea-ai-platform-20230921.pdf, 2023. 
  2. M. S. Choi, W. Y. Choi, and M. S. Lee, "Students at domestic international schools ghostwrite assignments using ChatGPT," https://www.donga.com/news/Society/article/all/20230209/117801590/1, 2023.
  3. L. Meckler and P. Verma, "Teachers are on alert for inevitable cheating after release of ChatGPT," https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/12/28/chatbot-cheating-ai-chatbotgpt-teachers/, 2022. 
  4. Stanford, "What do AI chatbots really mean for students and cheating?," https://ed.stanford.edu/news/what-do-ai-chatbots-really-mean-students-and-cheating, 2023. 
  5. W. B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, V. Gonzalez-Roma, and A. B. Bakker, "The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, pp. 71-92, 2002. DOI:10.1023/A:1015630930326 
  6. E. Breso, W. B. Schaufeli, and M. Salanova, "Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A quasi-experimental study," Higher Education, 61(4), pp. 339-355, 2011. DOI:10.1007/s10734-010-9334-6 
  7. R. J. Collie, A. J. Holliman, and A. J. Martin, "Adaptability, engagement and academic achievement at university," Educational Psychology, 37(5), pp. 632-647, 2017. DOI:10.1080/01443410.2016.1231296 
  8. P. Holm, "Impact of digital literacy on academic achievement: Evidence from an online anatomy and physiology course," E-Learning and Digital Media, 20427530241232489, 2024. DOI:10.1177/20427530241232489 
  9. I. M. Martinez, C. M. Youssef-Morgan, M. J. Chambel, and A. Marques-Pinto, "Antecedents of academic performance of university students: Academic engagement and psychological capital resources," Educational Psychology, 39(8), pp. 1047-1067, 2019. DOI:10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382 
  10. J. H. Yeo, "'Generative AI' launched by ChatGPT, but it is too early to cheer" https://www.ezyeconomy.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=122238, 2023. 
  11. C. Song and Y. Song, "Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students," Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843, 2023. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 
  12. S. Lee, and G. Park, "Development and validation of ChatGPT literacy scale," Current Psychology, pp. 1-13, 2024. DOI:10.1007/s12144-024-05723-0 
  13. P. Gilster, "Digital literacy", John Wiley, 1997. 
  14. E. Lee, S. Lee, and H. Keum, "Analysis of the Effects of Privacy Concerns on Restricted Disclosure of SNS: Digital Literacy as a Moderator," Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (JKAIE), 27(5), pp. 521-530, 2023.  https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2023.27.5.521
  15. L. Leung and P. S. Lee, "Impact of internet literacy, internet addiction symptoms, and internet activities on academic performance," Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), pp. 403-418, 2012. DOI:10.1177/0894439311435217 
  16. L. Pagani, G. Argentin, M. Gui, and L. Stanca, "The impact of digital skills on educational outcomes: evidence from performance tests," Educational Studies, 42(2), pp. 137-162, 2016. DOI:10.1080/03055698.2016.1148588 
  17. H. Lei, Y. Xiong, M. M. Chiu, J. Zhang, and Z. Cai, "The relationship between ICT literacy and academic achievement among students: A meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, 127, 106123, 2021. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106123 
  18. M. Hassan, A. S. Malik, G. Sang, M. Rizwan, I. Mushtaque, and S. Naveed, "Examine the parenting style effect on the academic achievement orientation of secondary school students: The moderating role of digital literacy," Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1063682, 2022. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063682 
  19. M. Kara, "Revisiting online learner engagement: exploring the role of learner characteristics in an emergency period," Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54:sup1,S236-S252, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2021.18919 7 
  20. H. J. Han, "A Qualitative Research on Exploring Consideration Factors for Educational Use of ChatGPT" The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT), 9(4), pp. 659-666, 2023. DOI:10.17703/JCCT.2023.9.4.659 
  21. P. H. Kim, J. W. Yoon, and H. Y. Kim, "University Faculty's Perspectives on Implementing ChatGPT in their Teaching," International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology (IJACT), 1 (4), pp. 56-61, 2023. DOI:10.17703/IJACT.2023.11.4.56 
  22. Y. J. Kim, "A Study on the Utilization of Digital Learning Support Tools in the Field of French Studies Education" The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT), 9(5), pp. 685-695, 2023. DOI:10.17703/JCCT.2023.9.5.685 
  23. B. Wang, P. L. P Rau, and T. Yuan, "Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale," Behaviour & Information Technology, pp. 1-14, 2022. DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768 
  24. D. D. Prior, J. Mazanov, D. Meacheam, G. Heaslip, and J. Hanson, "Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior," The Internet and Higher Education, 29, pp. 91-97, 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001 
  25. P. Sander, and L. Sanders, "Understanding academic confidence," Psychology Teaching Review, 12(1), pp. 29-42, 2006. 
  26. A. Bandura, "Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control", New York: Freeman, 1997. 
  27. P. Carroll, P. Brinol, R. E. Petty, and J. Ketcham, "Feeling prepared increases confidence in any accessible thoughts affecting evaluation unrelated to the original domain of preparation," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 89, 103962, 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103962 
  28. R. Banerjee, N. D. Gupta, and M. C. Villeval, "Feedback spillovers across tasks, self-confidence and competitiveness," Games and Economic Behavior 123, pp. 127-170, 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.geb.2020.07.002 
  29. L. Nicholson, D. Putwain, L. Connors, and P. Hornby-Atkinson, "The key to successful achievement as an undergraduate student: confidence and realistic expectations?," Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), pp. 285-298, 2013. DOI:10.1080/03075079.2011.585710 
  30. Y. Zhao, Z. Zheng, C. Pan, and L. Zhou, "Self-esteem and academic engagement among adolescents: A moderated mediation model," Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 690828, 2021. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690828 
  31. A. Kaplan, and C. Midgley, "The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference?," Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2 (4), pp. 415-435, 1997. DOI:10.1006/ceps.1997.0943 
  32. J. Ferla, M. Valcke, and G. Schuyten, "Judgments of self-perceived academic competence and their differential impact on students' achievement motivation, learning approach, and academic performance," European Journal of Psychology of Education 25, pp. 519-536, 2010. DOI:10.1007/s10212-010-0030-9 
  33. J. M. Froiland and E. Oros, "Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement," Educational Psychology, 34(2), pp. 119-132, 2014. DOI:10.1080/01443410.2013.822964 
  34. B. A. Greene, R. B. Miller, M. Crowson, B. L. Duke, and K. L. Akey, "Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation," Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, pp. 462-482, 2004. DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006 
  35. G. Ceylan, M. O. Eken, S. Yuruk, and F. Emir, "Examining the Influence of Self-Esteemand Digital Literacy on Professional Competence Factors in Dental Education: A Cross-Sectional Study," Applied Sciences, 13(16), 9411, 2023. DOI:10.3390/app13169411 
  36. P. Lindemann-Matthies, C. Constantinou, H. J. Lehnert, U. Nagel, G. Raper, and C. Kadji-Beltran, "Confidence and perceived competence of preservice teachers to implement biodiversity education in primary schools-Four comparative case studies from Europe," International Journal of Science Education, 3 (16), pp. 2247-2273, 2011. DOI:10.1080/09500693.2010.547534 
  37. F. Pajares, "Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings," Review of Educational Research, 6 (4), pp. 543-578, 1996. DOI:10.3102/00346543066004543 
  38. C. Furrer and E. Skinner, "Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance," Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148, 2003. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148 
  39. A. F. Hayes, "Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis," Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, 1, 20, 2013. 
  40. K. J. Preacher and A. F. Hayes, "Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models," Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), pp. 879-891, 2008. DOI:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879