DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

개인과 미디어의 선택성이 강화된 디지털 뉴스 유통 환경에서 선택적 노출과 의견변화, 정치참여의 관계 연구

A study on the relationship between selective exposure, opinion change, and political participation in a digital news distribution environment

  • 신지희 (숙명여자대학교 미디어학과) ;
  • 양승찬 (숙명여자대학교 미디어학부)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.25
  • 심사 : 2024.02.25
  • 발행 : 2024.03.31

초록

본 연구는 현재 디지털 뉴스 유통 과정이 개인의 선택, 이에 기반한 미디어의 선택으로 인해 이용자들에게 정치적으로 편향된 정보를 제공할 수 있다는 점에 초점을 맞추고 개인의 뉴스 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인과 이용자의 정파적 선호에 맞춤화된 뉴스가 추천됐을 때 발생할 수 있는 의견변화와 정치참여의 효과를 탐색적으로 분석했다. 자신의 정파적 선호에 부합하는 뉴스를 선택하는 선택적 노출의 현상은 개인이 한정적 정보처리를 많이 이용하고, 정치적 신념이 같은 집단 간의 높은 토론 효능감을 경험할수록 그 정도가 높은 것으로 니타났다. 선택적 노출의 정도가 높은 개인에게 정파적 성향과 일치하는 일방향 메시지의 뉴스를 무작위로 제공했을 때 기존 의견이 강화되는 방향으로 의견 공고화와 의견보강 정보처리가 일어나면서 온라인 정치참여가 높아지는 경향성이 발견되었다. 반면 이들에게 미디어가 경쟁하는 두 정파적 입장을 균형있게 다룬 양방향 메시지 뉴스를 무작위로 제공했을 경우 상대편의 견해와 논지를 이해하고 더 나은 의견이 있다면 기존 의견을 조정해보려는 의향이 함께 발견되었다. 이 연구는 숙의민주주의 과정에서 다양한 의견을 균형있게 이용하는 것의 중요성을 지적하고 이와 관련한 미디어 리터러시의 필요성을 제안했다.

The current distribution of digital news has the potential to produce politically biased information for users as a result of individual choices and media selection based on those choices. Consequently, this research explored the factors affecting individual news selection and the effects of opinion changes and political participation that can occur when news tailored to users' partisan preferences is recommended. The phenomenon of selective exposure has been shown to be stronger when individuals utilize more limited information processing, experience higher discussion efficacy among groups with similar political beliefs. Furthermore, When a selective exposure group was randomly provided with a one-way message news that matched their partisan leanings, it was found that opinion consolidation, opinion-reinforcing information processing, and online political participation. On the other hand, when they were randomly presented with two-way messaging news in which the media balanced two competing partisan positions, they were found to be more likely to understand the other side's views and arguments, and more willing to adjust their existing opinions. We are confirmed that the balanced use of various opinions is very important in deliberative democratic process.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. H. Lim. "40% of people say, I don't want to eat if my political leanings are different," Chosun Media, January 2023. 
  2. Bruns, A. "Gatekeeping, gatewatching, real-time feedback: New challenges for journalism," Brazilian journalism research, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 117-136, December 2011.  https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v7n2.2011.355
  3. Sunstein, C. R. "The polarization of extremes," The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 54, No. 16, pp. 9, December 2007. 
  4. K. H. Kim. "Agenda Setting by Portal News Sites: Comparison of Portal News and Print News," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS), Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 28-52, June 2008. 
  5. K. H. Kim. "Gatekeeping of Mobile Portal News' Influence on Using News in the Perspective of Journalism," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS), Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 117-144, June 2016.  https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2016.60.3.005
  6. J. H. Choi and H.W. Lee, "Digital news report in Korea 2023," Korea Press Foundation, pp. 12-57, September 2023. 
  7. A. R. Park and S. E. Lee. "Digital news report in Korea 2020," Korea Press Foundation, pp. 14-103, October 2020. 
  8. Klapper, J. T. "The Effects of mass Communication," New York: Free Press. 1960. 
  9. Lowery, S. A and DeFleur, M. L. "Milestones in mass communication research: Media effects," White Plains, NY: Longman. January 1995. 
  10. Y. S. Hwang. "Political Divide of Twitter Space: The Verification of Selective Disclosure," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS), Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 58-79, April 2013. 
  11. Dylko, I., Dolgov. I., Igor. I., Hoffman. W., Eckhart. N., Molina. M and Aaziz, O. "The dark side of technology: An experimental investigation of the influence of customizability technology on online political selective exposure," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 73, pp. 181-190. March 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.031
  12. Nickerson, R. S. "Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises," Review of general psychology, Vol. 2, No.2, pp. 175-220. June 1998.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  13. Pariser, E. "The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think." Penguin, UK: London. April 2011. 
  14. I.S. Kim. and J.M. Kim. "Youtube Algorithm and Confirmation Bias," Poster session presented at the Korean Association of Computer Education, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 71-74, January 2021. 
  15. Lazarsfeld, P, F., Berelson, B and Gaudet, H. "The People's Choice-How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign," NY: Columbia University Press. 1944. 
  16. Thurman, N and Schifferes, S. "The future of personalization at news websites: Lessons from a longitudinal study," Journalism studies, Vol. 13. No. 5-6, pp. 775-790, March 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664341
  17. Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Trilling, D., Moller, J and Bodo, B., de Vreese, C. H. and Helberger, N. "Should we worry about filter bubbles?," Internet Policy Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2016. 
  18. Iyengar, S and McGrady, J. "Media Politics: A Citizen's Guide," NY: W. W. Norton & Company, January 2015. 
  19. Y. S. Hwang. "Political Divide of Twitter Space: The Verification of Selective Disclosure," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS), Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 58-79, April 2013. 
  20. S. Y. Lee. "Party, Media, and Issue Preferences : Media Choice and Political Attitude in the 2014 Seoul Mayoral Election," 21st centry Political Science Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 217-245, December 2014.  https://doi.org/10.17937/topsr.24.3.201412.217
  21. Dylko, I., Dolgov. I., Igor. I., Hoffman. W., Eckhart. N., Molina. M and Aaziz, O. "The dark side of technology: An experimental investigation of the influence of customizability technology on online political selective exposure," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 73, pp. 181-190. August 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.031
  22. W. Y. Jang. "Information/Media Selection and Bias Mobilization: the Case of Taegeuk-gi rally," Korean Political Science Review. Vol. 52, No. 5, pp.87-113, December 2018.  https://doi.org/10.18854/KPSR.2018.52.5.004004
  23. Pariser, E. "The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think," Penguin, UK: London. April 2012. 
  24. J. H. Choi. "The Effects of Cross-cutting Exposure in Online Social Network Sites on Political Participation: Focusing on the Cross-cutting Observation, Cross-cutting Involvement, and Strength of Partisanship," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS). Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 152-177, October 2015. 
  25. Sunstein, C. R. "The polarization of extremes," The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 54, No. 16, December 2007 
  26. Mutz, D. C. "Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice," American Political Science Review, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 111-126, March 2002.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004264
  27. H. J. Song., S. M. Shin and S. K. Park. "Reading Dissonant Opinions on the Internet and Its Effects on Argument Repertoire and Tolerance," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS). Vol. 50, No. 5, October 2006. 
  28. Festinger, L. "A theory of cognitive dissonance," Stanford University Press. 1957. 
  29. Ju-eun Kim. "An Analysis of the effect of Artificial Intelligence on Human Society," The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT). Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 177-182, May 2019. 
  30. Beasley, R. K., and Joslyn, M. R. "Cognitive dissonance and post-decision attitude change in six presidential elections," Political Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp.521-540, September 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00252
  31. M. J. Ham, and S. W. Lee. "Effects of Selective Exposure to YouTube Political Videos on Attitude Polarization: Verifying Mediating Effects of Political Identification," Journal of Digital Contents Society. Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 157-169. March 2021.
  32. D. H. Shin, and J. H. Lee. "Does Survey Response on The Use of Internet News Sites Reflect Actual Use of The Sites?: An Exploration of Selective Exposure and In-group Bias," Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies. Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 157-197. July 2014. 
  33. C. Y. Jung, and C. S. Kim. "Moderate effects of individual characteristics on selective media exposure: Focusing on the roles of political dispositions, motivation for media use, and voter's cognitive deliberation," The Journal of Political Science & Communication. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 149-183, June 2018.  https://doi.org/10.15617/psc.2018.6.21.2.149
  34. Valentino, N. A., Banks, A. J., Hutchings, V. L., and Davis, A. K. "Selective exposure in the internet age: The interaction between anxiety and information utility," Political Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 591-613, July 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.x
  35. Yang, Z. J., and Kahlor, L. "What, Me Worry? The Role of Affect in Information Seeking and Avoidance," Science Communication, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 189-212. May 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441873
  36. Fischer, P., and Greitemeyer, T. "A New Look at Selective-Exposure Effects: An Integrative Model," Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 384-389, December 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410391246
  37. J. H. Choi. "How do users choose news in online news environment? - Investigating the predictors and consequences of using different news cues on online portal news sites," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS), Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 143-169, April 2018. 
  38. Forte, J. "That's why I deleted you, Aunt Kathy: Political tolerance, online selective exposure, and relational closeness," Undergraduate Honors Thesis. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. March 2019. 
  39. E. M. Kim, and J. W. Lee. "Effects of Online Deliberation on Political Discussion Efficacy," Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 393-423, June 2006. 
  40. Klapper, J. T. "The effects of mass communication," Free Press of Glencoe. 1960. 
  41. Nickerson, R. S. "Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises," Review of General Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 175-220, June 1998.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  42. Prior, M. "Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections," Cambridge University Press. 2007. 
  43. Sunstein, C. R. "Human agency and behavioral economics: Nudging fast and slow," New York: Springer. 2017. 
  44. Wallace, J. "Modelling contemporary gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination," Digital Journalism. Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 274-293. July 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648
  45. M. H. Kang. "Does YouTube Reinforce Confirmation Bias?: A Study on the Political Uses of YouTube and Its Effects," Journal of Speech, Media and Communication Research (JSMCR). Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 261-288, November 2021. https://doi.org/10.51652/ksmca.2021.20.4.8
  46. J. Y. Park, and J. B. Yoon. "How do Party Members Behave on Social Media?: The Case of the 21st General Election in South Korea," JOURNAL OF FUTURE POLITICS. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 5-26, June 2021. https://doi.org/10.20973/JOFP.2021.11.1.5
  47. Butler, J. V., Giuliano, P., and Guiso, L. "Trust, values, and false consensus," International Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 889-915, July 2015. 
  48. M. G. Lee, and J. H. Kim. "The Effect of Selective Exposure of Political Orientation on Online Political Participation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Attitude Polarization," Journal of Digital Contents Society, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 261-272. April 2022. 
  49. Lin, J. S. "Cross-Cutting exposure, perceived realism, and online political engagement in the age of algorithms," Asian Journal of Communication, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 131-151, March 2022.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.2022175
  50. J, H. Yoon, and J. H. Choi. "Investigating the Relationship between Cross-cutting Exposure on Social Media and Opinion Extremity: Focusing on Encountering, Interacting, and Avoiding Disagreement," Journal of Digital Contents Society, Vol. 21, No. 7, July 2020. 
  51. Beasley, R. K., and Joslyn, M. R. "Cognitive dissonance and post-decision attitude change in six presidential elections," Political psychology, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 521-540. January 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00252
  52. M. J. Ham and S. W. Lee. "Effects of Selective Exposure to YouTube Political Videos on Attitude Polarization: Verifying Mediating Effects of Political Identification," Journal of Digital Contents Society. Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 157-169. March 2021.
  53. J. H. Lee., Y. G. Choi and S. G. Cho. "A Desirable Communication Model for Political Efficacy and Tolerance : A Suggestion toward Participatory Democracy and Deliberative Democracy," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS). Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 7-36. April 2015. 
  54. E. M. Kim and J. W. Lee. "Effects of Online Deliberation on Political Discussion Efficacy," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies(KJJCS). Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 393-423, June 2006. 
  55. Y. J. Choi and J. H. Lee. "Cross-Cutting Exposure on the Internet discussion Forums and Its Influence on Political Tolerance: A Mediation Analysis of Opinion Modification and Opinion Polarization," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies(KJJCS). Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 301-330, April 2012. 
  56. S. C. Yang., M. N. Lee and H. J. Seo. "The Effects of Opinion-Seeking Propensity, Prior Knowledge, and Media Uses to Information Processing of News Reading," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies (KJJCS). Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 202-227, June 2014. 
  57. D. H. Lee. "A Study on the Communicative Toleration of Blogsphere as Deliberative Public Sphere," Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies(KJJCS). Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 27-49. August 2009. 
  58. H. Lim., J. G. Lee., J. W. Kim., J. W. Lee and Y. H. Kim. "The Effect of Fact-Checking Behavior on Political Polarization: Focusing on The Mediating Effects of Like-Minded and Cross-Cutting Discussion," The Research Institute of Social Science. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 7-32. September 2021.