Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The impact of overnight lairage on meat quality and storage stability of pork loin

  • Minwoo Choi (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Dongheon Lee (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hyun Jung Lee (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ki-Chang Nam (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Sung-Sil Moon (Sunjin Technology & Research Institute) ;
  • Jong Hyun Jung (Jung P&C Institute, Inc.) ;
  • Cheorun Jo (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2023.09.15
  • Accepted : 2023.12.22
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Lairage, a part of the animal welfare practices, has been known to mitigate pre-slaughter stress in animals. However, research investigating the relationship between lairage and pork meat quality remains scarce. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the physicochemical quality and storage stability of pork from pigs subjected to immediate slaughter (CON) and those provided with a 24 h lairage before slaughter (LRG) over a 7-day storage period. The loins from 20 castrated pigs in each group, respectively, were collected at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days and used for analysis of meat quality and storage stability, including pH, meat color, moisture, water holding capacity, drip loss, cooking loss, shear force, fatty acid composition, lipid oxidation, antioxidant activity, and electrical resistance. Overall, there were no significant differences in physicochemical meat quality parameters between CON and LRG groups. Similarly, no differences were observed in the storage stability of pork including 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity and electrical resistance. However, the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids was significantly higher in LRG compared to CON. In conclusion, 24 h lairage for castrated pigs had limited impact on meat quality and storage stability but led to an increase in the unsaturated fatty acid proportion.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Over the past 20 years, consumer demand for animal welfare has witnessed a substantial increase. Ethical consciousness among consumers has reached a point where they refuse purchasing products failing to meet their animal welfare standards [1]. Font-i-Furnols suggested that meat quality now encompasses socio-ethical values, including consideration like production system, animal welfare, and environmental impacts, with animal welfare emerging as an important factor influencing consumer purchasing decisions [2]. Furthermore, it is widely known that preslaughter stress can exert adverse effects on meat quality parameters, such as ultimate pH and drip loss [3]. Consequently, effective control of preslaughter stress is imperative to ensure optimal meat quality [4]. Previous studies have shown that the implementation of animal welfare practices helps alleviate stress in animal as evidenced by indicators such as blood cortisol levels or heart rates [5,6,7]. As a result, the importance of animal welfare has been consistently emphasized.

Pigs are commonly known to be sensitive to stress [8]. Therefore, various forms of stress can significantly affect the quality of pork [9]. Many previous studies have consistently affirmed that stress experienced during the preslaughter period exerts adverse effects on pork quality. These effects include lower pH levels, reduced water holding capacity (WHC) and moisture content, along with higher drip loss, electrical conductivity, and L* value [10,11,12]. For these reasons, it becomes evident that minimizing stress in domestic animals is significantly important. Accordingly, many studies have focused on developing strategies to alleviate the preslaughter stress [13,14,15].

Lairage, an important preslaughter handling process that provides a rest period for animals before they are slaughtered to reduce stress and fatigue that they may have experienced during transportation and therefore this process ultimately prevents quality deterioration [7]. Extensive research has been conducted on the effects of lairage on animal stress and meat quality, with a specific focus on the duration of lairage. Liste et al. suggested that lamb meat with 12 h lairage showed lower levels of cortisol, lactate, and glucose compared to meat without lairage [16]. Additionally, it exhibited higher WHC and lower b* value. Díaz et al. showed similar results that suckling lamb with 24 h lairage had lower b* value and higher WHC than lamb without lairage [17]. Moreover, they also indicated that, after five days of storage, the differences of meat color and WHC between the groups became reduced. Another previous study proposed that pre-slaughter fasting could be useful for increasing ultimate pH and lowering the possibility of pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) pork [18]. However, the existing literature usually did not consider the above aspects as the main arguments of the paper; instead, it predominantly focused on stress indicators like cortisol [19]. Therefore, there is scarce information regarding the relationship between meat quality and lairage, especially in pork. In addition, as mentioned before, while stress is influence on the composition of the pork, limited research explores the relationship between lairage and storage stability of pork.

In this regard, we hypothesized that lairage may enhance pork quality during storage and improve storage stability. Therefore, we aimed to examine the effects of overnight lairage on quality characteristics and storage stability-related properties during 7 days of storage by comparing samples of pigs without lairage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and experimental design

The experimental design of the present study is described in Fig. 1. A total of 40 castrated pigs were raised in an animal-friendly farm, Cheil breeding stock farm (Incheon, Korea) until their live weight reached 30 kg. A stocking density of the farm was over 0.3 m2 per animal. Then, they were transported to Yuunwoo animal welfare-friendly farm (Hwasung, Korea) and raised in four separate pens ensuring a stocking density of over 1 m2 per animal until they reached the target weight of 110 kg. Each pen accommodated 10 pigs, with 5 of them undergoing an overnight lairage for 24 h without access to food, but with free access to water before being slaughtered (LRG). The pigs assigned to LRG were transported one day prior slaughter, while the other 5 pigs were slaughtered immediately upon arrival at the abattoir (CON). As a result, a total of twenty pigs were allocated to each treatment group. The abattoir (Dodram, Anseong, Korea) was approximately 90 km far from the farm, which took approximately 2 h for pig transportation. During transportation, the temperature was maintained in the enclosed truck at around 15℃–18℃ to minimize stress. The detailed information of carcasses is shown in Table 1. Both groups were slaughtered on the same day, and the loin cuts were collected, vacuum-packed, and transported to the laboratory in a cooler with ice both top and bottom. The loins were stored for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days to investigate the effect of storage on pork loin from CON and LRG. The experiment was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) at Suncheon National University, Suncheon, Korea (SCNU IACUC-2020-12).

DMJGDA_2024_v66n2_412_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. A schematic diagram of the experiment design. On day 1, 20 pigs designated for the lairage (LRG) group were brought from the farm and held in a lairage area for 24 h. On day 2, 20 pigs designated for the control (CON) group were brought from the same farm to the abattoir directly. Both groups were slaughtered on the same day, and carcasses from each group were randomly selected and loin cuts from the carcasses were collected. Each loin cut was divided into four blocks and stored for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days and used for pork quality and storage stability analyses. WHC, water holding capacity; TBARS, 2-thiobarbituric acid; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.

Table 1. The carcass characteristics and fat content of the pigs with no (CON) or 24 h lairage (LRG)

DMJGDA_2024_v66n2_412_t0001.png 이미지

1)Values are presented as n = 40.

a,bDifferent letters within the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

pH

A meat sample (2 g) was mixed with 18 mL of distilled water and homogenized using a homogenizer (Polytron PT10-35 GT, Kinematica AG, Luzern, Switzerland) at 11,000 rpm for 60 s. The homogenates were filtered using a Whatman No. 4 filter paper (Whatman PLC, Kent, UK) and the pH of each filtrate was measured using a pH meter (SevenExcellenceTM, Mettler Toledo International, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). Before measurement, the pH meter was calibrated using standard buffers with pH values of 4.01, 7.00, and 9.21.

Meat color

Meat color was measured using a colorimeter (CM-5, Konica Minolta Sensing, Osaka, Japan). Before measurement, the sample was exposed to air for 30 min to bloom, and the instrument was calibrated using a standard white plate. The illuminant was D65 and the standard observer was set to 10°, and the meat color was measured using a plate with a diameter of 30 mm. The results were expressed as Commission Internationale d’Eclairage (CIE) L*, a*, and b*, which represent lightness, redness and yellowness, respectively. Each sample was measured three times and its average value was used as one replicate.

Moisture content

The moisture content was measured according to the AOAC method with some modification. The weight of a pre-dried aluminum dish was measured and three grams of meat sample was placed on the dish. The sample was then dried in a dry oven at 104℃ until it reached a constant weight, and then transferred to the desiccator. The weight of the dried sample with the dish was measured. The moisture content was calculated as a percentage using the following equation:

\(\begin{align}\operatorname{Moisture}(\%)=\frac{\left(P_{0}+M_{0}\right)-P_{1}}{M_{0}} \times 100\end{align}\)

where M0 represents the weight of the sample. P0 and P1 represent the weight of the dish before drying and the weight of the dish with sample after drying, respectively.

Water holding capacity

Five grams of the sample were centrifuged at 1,000×g for 10 min at 5℃ (Combi-514R, Hanil, Daejeon, Korea). The weight of the meat sample was then measured, and the WHC was calculated using the following equation:

\(\begin{align}W H C(\%)=\frac{M \times S_{1}}{M \times S_{0}} \times 100\end{align}\)

where M represents the value for moisture content, S0 represents the initial sample weight, and S1 represents the weight of the sample after centrifugation.

Drip loss and cooking loss

Drip loss was calculated by measuring the ratio of weight loss before and after storage [20]. Cooking loss was calculated by measuring the weight difference before and after heating a sample (30 mm × 50 mm × 10 mm; width × length × height) until its core temperature reached 75℃ using water bath. The calculation formula is as follows:

\(\begin{align}\text {Cooking loss}(\%)=\frac{C_{0}-C_{1}}{C_{0}} \times 100\end{align}\)

where C0 is the initial weight of the sample and C1 is the weight of the sample after cooking.

Warner-Bratzler shear force

The sample was cut into a size of 40 mm × 50 mm × 10 mm (width × length × height), then cooked until the core temperature of the sample reached 75℃. After that, the sample was re-cut into a size of 10 mm × 20 mm × 10 mm (width × length × height) to make the shape accurate and consistent [21]. The Warner-Bratzler blade was attached to a texture analyzer (TA-XT2, Stable Micro System, Surrey, UK) and the muscle fiber direction of the sample was placed perpendicularly to the blade to measure the shear force. The instrumental condition was set to pre-test speed 2.0 mm/s, test speed 2.0 mm/s, and post-test speed 5.0 mm/s. The shear force was expressed as kgf.

Fatty acid composition

Fatty acid composition of the meat sample was measured according to O’Fallon et al. and Uyen et al. with some modification [22,23]. The sample (1 g) was mixed with 0.7 mL of 10 N KOH and 6.3 mL of methanol and placed in a constant-temperature water bath at 55℃. The mixture was vigorously shaken every 30 min for 1 h and 30 min. After cooling in ice water for 1–2 min, 0.58 mL of 24 N H2SO4 was added to the samples and the mixture was shaken again every 30 min for 1 h and 30 min while being heated in the constant-temperature water bath at 55℃. After cooling in ice water, 3 mL of hexane was added, and the mixture was centrifuged at 3,000×g for 5 min using a Combi-514R centrifuge (Hanil) to separate the fatty acid methyl esters. The upper layer was transferred to a vial using a Pasteur pipette, injected into the gas chromatograph equipped with the HP-88 column (60 m × 0.2 mm × 250 μm) and a flame ionization detector (Agilent 7890 series, Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The injector was set to a split ratio of 25:1 with a temperature of 250℃, and the temperature of the detector was set to 250℃. A high-purity mixture of air, H2, and He was used as a carrier gas with a flow rate of 400 mL/min for air and 40 mL/min for H2.

2-Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances

The sample (5 g) was mixed with 15 mL of distilled water in a 50 mL test tube and homogenized. Then, 1 mL of the homogenate was transferred into a disposable test tube, and 50 μL of 7.2% butylated hydroxytoluene in ethanol (w/v) and 2 mL of 20 mM thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in 15% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution (w/v) were added into the tube. The mixture was thoroughly vortexed and incubated at 95℃ in a water bath for 15 min, and cooled for 10 min. The mixture was mixed again, and centrifuged at 2,265×g at 5℃ for 15 min (Combi-514R, Hanil). The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 531 nm. Distilled water (1 mL) and TBA/TCA solution (2 mL) were mixed together to be used as a blank. The TBARS value was expressed as mg malondialdehyde (MDA) per kg of meat sample.

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity

The meat sample (2 g) was mixed with 18 mL of distilled water and homogenized at 11,000 rpm for 1 min using a homogenizer (Polytron PT10-35 GT, Kinematica AG). The homogenate was then centrifuged at 2,265×g for 10 min (Combi-514R, Hanil). After centrifugation, 0.4 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 1.6 mL of distilled water and 2 mL of 0.2 mM DPPH in methanol solution. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 60 min in the dark, and the absorbance of the sample was measured at 517 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as a reference and distilled water absorbance was also measured for control. Lastly, the DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated using the following formula:

\(\begin{align}\text {DPPH radical scavenging activity}(\%)=\frac{\text {Absorbance of Control - Absorbance of sample}}{\text {Absorbance of Control}} \times 100\end{align}\)

Electrical resistance

Each sample’s electrical resistance was measured using an RCL electric bridge (630A automatic RCL meter with an adaptor PM 9542A, Philips, Hamburg, Germany). The measurement was performed by inserting a probe (YL-69, Jiexing, Guangdong, China), which is a soil moisture sensor, into the center of the sample to obtain the impedance (Z, Ω) value. The measurement was repeated three times to obtain the mean value.

Statistical analysis

The results were analyzed via one- and two-way analysis of variance using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Tukey’s multiple test was used to determine the significant differences between sample groups at p < 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Comparative analysis of the physicochemical characteristics of immediate slaughte and 24 h lairage before slaughter groups

We conducted a comparative analysis of the differences in the physicochemical quality of the CON and LRG groups over a 7-day storage period, including pH, meat color, moisture, WHC, drip loss, cooking loss, and shear force (Table 2).

Table 2. Changes in the physicochemical traits of pork loin from the pigs with no (CON) or 24 h lairage (LRG) during seven days of storage

DMJGDA_2024_v66n2_412_t0002.png 이미지

1)Values are presented as n = 80.

2)Values are presented as n = 40.

3)Values are presented as n = 60.

a,bDifferent letters within the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

X–ZDifferent letters within the same row indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

WHC; water holding capacity.

pH

There were no significant differences in pH between the CON and LRG groups during five days of storage, but on day 7, the LRG group showed significantly higher pH compared to CON (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The overall pH values of pork were within an average pH range of pork loin (from 5.5 to 5.8) which was reported by Warner et al., indicating that lairage did not directly affect the incidence of PSE or Dark Firm Dry (DFD) meat [24]. It was hard to find any research comparing samples that underwent no lairage before slaughter and those with a 24 h lairage (long period lairage). However, the previous study compared short and long period lairage indicated that there was no significant difference observed in the ultimate pH of pork between short (8 min to 2.7 h) and extended period lairage (14 h to 21.5 h) [9]. Furthermore, Fernandez et al. and Śmiecińska et al. reached similar conclusions, finding no significant difference in pH between groups subjected to short lairage and those with an extended lairage period [25,26]. This suggests that the pork production system can accommodate an overnight lairage period as a pre-slaughter method, followed by the findings outlined in the earlier paper by Miranda-de la Lama et al. [27].

The pork samples were stored for days 1-7 to simulate retail condition, and during storage, the meat pH within each group did not differ significantly during seven days of storage. Importantly, meat pH is strongly correlated with other physicochemical quality attributes such as meat color and WHC [28]. Therefore, the similar pH value between both groups might lead to the similar meat color and WHC observed in our study. Meanwhile, as Liste stated, lairage could reduce the levels of cortisol, lactate, and glucose [16]. These are stress metabolites, and if their blood levels are high, it leads to excessive postmortem muscle metabolism and lowers the pH level [29]. However, since there was no difference in this study, further research is needed from a metabolite perspective.

Meat color

There were no significant differences in any of the L*, a*, and b* values between CON and LRG groups at all storage periods (p > 0.05) except for L* value on day 5, where CON showed higher value than LRG (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Within the CON group, the L* value decreased on day 3 but then increased on day 5, while the a* value increased on day 3 and decreased on day 7. The b* value showed no significant changes throughout the storage period in CON. Conversely, in the LRG group, the L* value decreased on day 3, then increased on day 5. Regarding the a* value of LRG, it increased on day 3 but gradually decreased on days 5 and 7. Similar to CON, the b* value in LRG showed no significant changes during the storage period. Furthermore, a two-way ANOVA (Table 3) revealed that the presence of lairage only had a significant effect on L* value, while storage time significantly affected all meat color traits in both in CON and LRG. These findings align with a previous study, which compared the meat qualities of pigs subjected to four different lairage times (0 h, 3 h, 8 h, and 24 h) [30]. Their study found that the initial L* value was higher in 0 h lairage group than in 24 h lairage group, which was in accordance with our results on day 5. However, the initial a* value was lower in 0 h group. Lastly, the b* value did not show significant difference between 0 h and 24 h groups, which corresponds to our result. In another study, the L* value and a* value of pork loin between 2 h and overnight lairage groups were not significantly different [31].

Table 3. Meat color of pork loin in relation to lairage and storage period

DMJGDA_2024_v66n2_412_t0003.png 이미지

1)CON, the pork loin without any lairage process; LRG, the pork loin with 24-hour lairage.

2)Values are presented as n = 160.

X-ZDifferent letters within the same row indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

*p < 0.0001.

Moisture and water holding capacity

The moisture content was not significantly different between CON and LRG groups throughout the whole storage period except for day 5, where CON had a significantly higher value than LRG (p < 0.01) (Table 2). In CON group, the highest moisture content was observed on day 3, with no significant differences noted on the other days. Similarly, in LRG, the highest value was also observed on day 3, with no significant differences on the other days.

Similarly, there were no significant differences in WHC were observed throughout the entire storage period. In CON group, the WHC was the highest at the initial storage day, with no significant differences between days 3, 5, and 7. Conversely, in LRG, the highest value of WHC was observed on day 1 but gradually decreased, showing significant differences on days 5 and 7. The distribution of water within the muscle tissue includes both intra-myofibrillar and extra-myofibrillar spaces of the cells, causing changes in the intracellular structure that directly impact the WHC. Moreover, as postmortem rigor progresses, the space within the myofibrils decreases gradually, leading to the extrusion of water and resulting in a higher drip loss.

Drip loss and cooking loss

Both drip loss and cooking loss did not show significant differences throughout the entire storage period between CON and LRG (Table 2). In CON group, drip loss significantly increased from day 3 to day 5 (p < 0.05), while cooking loss showed a significant increase over the storage period, reaching its highest value on day 5, followed by a significant decrease on day 7. Similar trends in the changes of drip loss and cooking loss were observed in LRG. Drip loss is closely related with pH and WHC [28,32]; higher pH and WHC resulted in less drip loss. Hence, the similar pH and WHC values observed in both CON and LRG groups likely contributed to the absence of significant difference in drip loss and cooking loss.

Warner-Bratzler shear force

Except for day 7 where CON showed a lower value than LRG (p < 0.05), there were no significant difference in the shear force value between CON and LRG (p > 0.05) (Table 2). In CON group, the shear force decreased gradually from 5.70 on the initial day of storage to 3.02 on day 7 (p < 0.05). Similarly, in LRG, the shear force also showed a gradual decrease from 6.01 on day 1 to 3.32 on day 7 during storage (p < 0.05). Both groups exhibited a decrease in shear force values with increasing storage days, which can be attributed to the degradation of Z-disks in myofibrillar structures and the weakening of actin-myosin interactions caused by enzymes which are present in the meat [33,34].

Overall, the effect of lairage on the physicochemical meat quality attributes was not significant in this study.

Differences in fatty acids composition on lairage duration

Overall, there were no significant differences in the fatty acid composition between CON and LRG (Table 4). According to the previous study, differences in fatty acid composition were observed depending on the stress genotype of pigs [35]. In the study, the stress-positive pigs had the lower percentages of the C14 and C16 fatty acids (C14:0, C16:0, and C16:1), but higher proportion of C18:0 acid than in the stress-negative pigs. In present study, although the percentage of an individual fatty acid did not show any significant difference, the sum of unsaturated fatty acids was significantly higher in LRG compared to CON. As a result, LRG showed significantly lower atherogenic index (AI) and thrombogenicity index (TI) compared to CON. It has been known that unsaturated fatty acids have various effects on cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and even on cognitive function [36]. Furthermore, lower values of AI and TI indicate better nutritional lipid quality as these indexes indicate the reduced probability of the incidence of atherosclerotic and thrombus formation, respectively [37]. Therefore, it could be interpreted that overnight lairage might have some positive impact on human health to some extent.

Table 4. Fatty acid composition (%) of pork loins with no (CON) or 24 h lairage (LRG)

DMJGDA_2024_v66n2_412_t0004.png 이미지

1)Values are presented as n = 30.

X,YDifferent letters within the same row indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

SFA, saturated fatty acid; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA; polyunsaturated fatty acid; AI, atherogenic index; TI, thrombogenicity index; P/S, ratio of PUFA to SFA.

Comparative analysis of the storage stability of pork from lairage

Lastly, to examine the differences in storage stability between CON and LRG during storage, we measured parameters including TBARS as an index of the degree of lipid oxidation, DPPH radical scavenging activity, and electrical resistance, which is known to be effective in freshness prediction [38]. For this analysis, it was only measured at day 1 and day 7, representing the initial and final day of whole storage for comparing changes in storage stability.

TBARS values were significantly higher on day 7 compared to day 1 in both the CON and LRG groups, with no significant difference between the two groups (Table 5). On the other hand, DPPH radical scavenging activity showed no significant differences between days 1 and 7 within each group, and similarly, no significant difference observed between the two groups. These findings suggest that a 24 h lairage did not significantly influence on the oxidation of meat.

Table 5. Changes in the TBARS, antioxidant activity, and electrical resistance of pork loin from the pigs with no (CON) or 24 h lairage (LRG) during seven days of storage

DMJGDA_2024_v66n2_412_t0005.png 이미지

1)Values are presented as n = 40.

X,YDifferent letters within the same row indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

TBARS, 2-thiobarbituric reactive substances; MDA, malondialdehyde; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.

According to Zhang et al., the tissue structure or cellular morphology of meat during storage can impact electrical parameters, and therefore electrical resistance holds potential predicting meat freshness like total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) value [38]. In CON group, the electrical resistance decreased significantly from day 1 to 7 (Table 5). Similarly, in LRG, there was a significant decrease in electrical resistance from day 1 to day 7, with no significant difference between the two groups. Therefore, considering the results of TBARS, DPPH, and electrical resistance, it appears that overnight lairage did not show a significant effect on storage stability of pork.

Previous studies have suggested that overnight lairage may lead to more frequent instances of fighting among pigs and increased occurrence of skin blemishes [39]. Additionally, it was proposed that the optimal lairage time for pigs could be between 1 and 3 h [40]. Although significant differences were not observed in most quality indicators between CON and LRG groups in the present study, the results could contribute to the establishment of more strategic conditions for animal welfare in pig production. In addition, it may be advisable to consider exploring the effect of a variety of lairage periods from short to long periods in future studies.

References

  1. Broom DM. Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J. 1986;142:524-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(86)90109-0 
  2. Font-i-Furnols M, Skrlep M, Aluwe M. Attitudes and beliefs of consumers towards pig welfare and pork quality. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2019;333:012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/333/1/012002 
  3. Ferguson DM, Bruce HL, Thompson JM, Egan AF, Perry D, Shorthose WR. Factors affecting beef palatability - farmgate to chilled carcass. Aust J Exp Agric. 2001;41:879-91. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA00022 
  4. Hambrecht E, Eissen JJ, Newman DJ, Smits CHM, den Hartog LA, Verstegen MWA. Negative effects of stress immediately before slaughter on pork quality are aggravated by suboptimal transport and lairage conditions. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:440-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.832440x 
  5. Brundige L, Oleas T, Doumit M, Zanella AJ. Loading techniques and their effect on behavioral and physiological responses of market weight pigs. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:99. 
  6. Correa JA, Torrey S, Devillers N, Laforest JP, Gonyou HW, Faucitano L. Effects of different moving devices at loading on stress response and meat quality in pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:4086-93. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-2833 
  7. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Hofmeyr C, Coleman GJ, Dowling S, Boyce J. The effects of fear of humans and pre-slaughter handling on the meat quality of pigs. Aust J Agric Res. 2002:53;493-501. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01098 
  8. Gregory NG, Lister D. Autonomic responsiveness in stress-sensitive and stress-resistant pigs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1981;4:67-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00712.x 
  9. Dokmanovic M, Velarde A, Tomovic V, Glamoclija N, Markovic R, Janjic J, et al. The effects of lairage time and handling procedure prior to slaughter on stress and meat quality parameters in pigs. Meat Sci. 2014;98:220-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.003 
  10. van der Wal PG, Engel B, Reimert HGM. The effect of stress, applied immediately before stunning, on pork quality. Meat Sci. 1999;53:101-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00039-X 
  11. Hambrecht E, Eissen JJ, Nooijen RIJ, Ducro BJ, Smits CHM, den Hartog LA, et al. Preslaughter stress and muscle energy largely determine pork quality at two commercial processing plants. J Anim Sci. 2004;82:1401-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8251401x 
  12. Gonzalez-Rivas PA, Chauhan SS, Ha M, Fegan N, Dunshea FR, Warner RD. Effects of heat stress on animal physiology, metabolism, and meat quality: a review. Meat Sci. 2020;162:108025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.108025 
  13. Hambrecht E, Eissen JJ, Newman DJ, Smits CHM, Verstegen MWA, den Hartog LA. Preslaughter handling effects on pork quality and glycolytic potential in two muscles differing in fiber type composition. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:900-7. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.834900x 
  14. Driessen B, Freson L, Buyse J. Fasting finisher pigs before slaughter influences pork safety, pork quality and animal welfare. Animals. 2020;10:2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122206 
  15. Delsart M, Pol F, Dufour B, Rose N, Fablet C. Pig farming in alternative systems: strengths and challenges in terms of animal welfare, biosecurity, animal health and pork safety. Agriculture. 2020;10:261. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070261 
  16. Liste G, Miranda-de la Lama GC, Campo MM, Villarroel M, Muela E, Maria GA. Effect of lairage on lamb welfare and meat quality. Anim Prod Sci. 2011;51:952-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10274 
  17. Diaz MT, Vieira C, Perez C, Lauzurica S, Gonzalez de Chavarri E, Sanchez M, et al. Effect of lairage time (0 h, 3 h, 6 h or 12 h) on glycogen content and meat quality parameters in suckling lambs. Meat Sci. 2014;96:653-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.013 
  18. Warriss PD. Loss of carcass weight, liver weight and liver glycogen, and the effects on muscle glycogen and ultimate pH in pigs fasted pre-slaughter. J Sci Food Agric. 1982;33:840-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740330905 
  19. Velarde A, Fabrega E, Blanco-Penedo I, Dalmau A. Animal welfare towards sustainability in pork meat production. Meat Sci. 2015;109:13-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.010 
  20. Kwon JA, Yim DG, Kim HJ, Ismail A, Kim SS, Lee HJ, et al. Effect of temperature abuse on quality and metabolites of frozen/thawed beef loins. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2022;42:341-9. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2022.e9 
  21. Kim SS, Lee YE, Kim CH, Min JS, Yim DG, Jo C. Determining the optimal cooking time for cooking loss, shear force, and off-odor reduction of pork large intestines. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2022;42:332-40. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2022.e6 
  22. O'Fallon JV, Busboom JR, Nelson ML, Gaskins CT. A direct method for fatty acid methyl ester synthesis: application to wet meat tissues, oils, and feedstuffs. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:1511-21. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-491 
  23. Uyen NT, Van Cuong D, Thuy PD, Son LH, Ngan NT, Quang NH, et al. A comparative study on the adipogenic and myogenic capacity of muscle satellite cells, and meat quality characteristics between Hanwoo and Vietnamese Yellow Steers. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2023;43:563-79. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e19 
  24. Warner RD, Kauffman RG, Greaser ML. Muscle protein changes post mortem in relation to pork quality traits. Meat Sci. 1997;45:339-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00116-7 
  25. Fernandez X, Magard M, Tornberg E. The variation in pig muscle glycolytic potential during lairage-an in-vivo study. Meat Sci. 1992;32:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(92)90018-Y 
  26. Smiecinska K, Denaburski J, Sobotka W. Slaughter value, meat quality, creatine kinase activity and cortisol levels in the blood serum of growing-finishing pigs slaughtered immediately after transport and after a rest period. Pol J Vet Sci. 2011;14:47-54. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10181-011-0007-x 
  27. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Villarroel M, Olleta JL, Alierta S, Sanudo C, Maria GA. Effect of the pre-slaughter logistic chain on meat quality of lambs. Meat Sci. 2009;83:604-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.07.009 
  28. Klont R. Influence of ultimate pH on meat quality and consumer purchasing decisions [Internet]. PIC. 2005 [cited 2023 Aug 9]. https://www.thepigsite.com/articles/influence-of-ultimate-ph-on-meat-quality-and-consumer-purchasing-decisions 
  29. Cobanovic N, Stankovic SD, Dimitrijevic M, Suvajdzic B, Grkovic N, Vasilev D, et al. Identifying physiological stress biomarkers for prediction of pork quality variation. Animals. 2020;10:614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040614 
  30. Zhen S, Liu Y, Li X, Ge K, Chen H, Li C, et al. Effects of lairage time on welfare indicators, energy metabolism and meat quality of pigs in Beijing. Meat Sci. 2013;93:287-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.09.008 
  31. Nanni Costa L, Lo Fiego DP, Dall'Olio S, Davoli R, Russo V. Combined effects of preslaughter treatments and lairage time on carcass and meat quality in pigs of different halothane genotype. Meat Sci. 2002;61:41-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00160-7 
  32. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: the role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 2005;71:194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022 
  33. Olson DG, Parrish FC Jr, Dayton WR, Goll DE. Effect of postmortem storage and calcium activated factor on the myofibrillar proteins of bovine skeletal muscle. J Food Sci. 1977;42:117-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1977.tb01233.x 
  34. Bhat ZF, Morton JD, Mason SL, Bekhit AEDA. Role of calpain system in meat tenderness: a review. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2018;7:196-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2018.08.002 
  35. Piedrafita J, Christian LL, Lonergan SM. Fatty acid profiles in three stress genotypes of swine and relationships with performance, carcass and meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 2001;57:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00078-4 
  36. Lunn J, Theobald HE. The health effects of dietary unsaturated fatty acids. Nutr Bull. 2006;31:178-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-3010.2006.00571.x 
  37. Ke Z, Bai Y, Bai Y, Chu Y, Gu S, Xiang X, et al. Cold plasma treated air improves the characteristic flavor of dry-cured black carp through facilitating lipid oxidation. Food Chem. 2022;377:131932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131932 
  38. Zhang Z, Li X, Tian J, Chen J, Gao G. A review: application and research progress of bioimpedance in meat quality inspection. J Food Process Eng. 2022;45:e14153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.14153 
  39. Brown SN, Knowles TG, Edwards JE, Warriss PD. Behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to being transported for up to 24 hours followed by six hours recovery in lairage. Vet Rec. 1999;145:421-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.145.15.421 
  40. Warriss PD, Brown SN, Edwards JE, Knowles TG. Effect of lairage time on levels of stress and meat quality in pigs. Anim Sci. 1998;66:255-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800009036