References
- Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Identifying individual differences in creative problem solving style. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(2), 111-131.
- Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01632.x
- Chun, O., Yang, H., & Kang, S. (2018). Exploration of empathy factors in the science and development of related scales. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1499477.
- Clapp, E. P., Ross, J., Ryan, J. O., & Tishman, S. (2016). Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. John Wiley & Sons.
- Coughlan, P., Suri, J. F., & Canales, K. (2007). Prototypes as (design) tools for behavioral and organizational change: A design-based approach to help organizations change work behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(1), 122-134.
- Cuff, B. M., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466
- Dasgupta, C. (2019). Improvable models as scaffolds for promoting productive disciplinary engagement in an engineering design activity. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(3), 394-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20282
- Dini, V., Jaber, L., & Danahy, E. (2019). Dynamics of scientific engagement in a blended online learning environment. Research in Science Education, 1-29.
- Duckworth, E. (2006). "The having of wonderful ideas" and other essays on teaching and learning (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Engle, R. A. (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: origins, key concepts and developments. In Y. Dai (Ed.), Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: enhancing intellectual growth and functioning (pp. 161-200). New York: Routledge.
- Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
- Feist, G. J. (2006). How development and personality influence scientific thought, interest, and achievement. Review of General Psychology, 10(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.2.163
- Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001001
- Fortus, D. (2014). Attending to affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21155
- Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
- Gruber, H. E. (1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
- Gruber, H. E. (2005). Creativity, psychology, and the history of science (1. Aufl. ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Hafner, R., & Stewart, J. (1995). Revising explanatory models to accommodate anomalous genetic phenomena: Problem solving in the "context of discovery". Science Education, 79(2), 111-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790202
- Han, M., & Oh, P. S. (2023). Empathetic and Disciplinary Utterances: Two Elementary School Teachers' Contrasting Approaches During Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 43(2), 167-180.
- Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 485-529. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1504_2
- Hammer, D. (2004). The variability of student reasoning, lectures 1-3. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI. Bologna: Italian Physical Society.
- Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development, 89, 115.
- Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100(2), 189-220.
- Jaber, L. Z., Robertson, A., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (2015). Attending to students' epistemic affect. In Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (Eds.), Responsive Teaching inScience and Mathematics, pp. 162-188. New York : Routledge.
- Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313401
- Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all Crown Business.
- Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
- Lee, D., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2015). The suggestion of design thinking process and its feasibility study for fostering group creativity of elementary-secondary school students in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0443
- Lee, J., You, S., & Lee, Y.(2014). A study on the development of empathy based learning model. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 151-177. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2014.30.4.151
- Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For Sates, by States. Washington, DC: Achieve Inc.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
- Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
- Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 16(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120118837
- Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2001). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world's most creative people. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Roth, W. M. (2012). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2000). Creative problem solving: Anintroduction (3rd Ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
- Watson, J. D. (1968). The Double Helix: Being a Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New York, Atheneum.
- Yang, H., & Kang, S. (2019). Scientific empathy discovered in scientists' problem-solving process. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 39(2), 249-261.
- Yang, H., & Kang, S. (2020). Exploring the korean adolescent empathy using the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., (21), 339-349.
- Yang, H., Anderson, D., & Kang, S. (2023). An instrument for measuring scientific empathy in students' disciplinary engagement: The Scientific Empathy Index. Manuscript submitted for publication, Frontier in Education.
- Yerrick, R., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Introduction: The role of language in science learning and teaching. Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research, 1-18.
- Yoon, J., Jo, T. J., & Kang, S. J. (2020). A study on the possibility of the relationship among group creativity, empathy, and scientific inquiry ability of elementary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2113-2125.
- Yrjonsuuri, V., Kangas, K., Hakkarainen, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2019). The roles of material prototyping in collaborative design process at an elementary school. Design and Technology Education.
- Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608.
- Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. (2016). Empathy. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (Eds.). Handbook of emotions, pp 871-884. New York : Guilford Press.
- Zeyer, A., & Dillon, J. (2019). The role of empathy for learning in complex science| environment| health contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 297-315.