Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Environmental Impact and Eco-Friendly Development of Logistics Facilities

물류시설의 환경영향 및 친환경적 개발 방안

  • Received : 2023.11.29
  • Accepted : 2024.02.01
  • Published : 2024.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, as e-commerce has been activated and the demand for daily logistics services has increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of small logistics facilities has increased rapidly. Logistics facilities are concentrated in certain areas in Gyeonggi-do, where transportation is convenient, with large hinterland cities, showing a rapid increase. This study analyzed development characteristics such as development scale, development method, floor area ratio, and use area for a total of 259 logistics facilities developed in three local governments: Anseong, Yeoju, and Icheon. Logistics facilities developed in a specific area are developed in the form of undeveloped development in non-urban areas, causing damage to the national land environment and social conflict. This study proposed institutional improvement measures and evaluation guidelines for eco-friendly development that can solve problems such as indiscriminate development, environmental impact, and conflicts with residents caused by logistics facility development.

최근 전자상거래의 활성화와 더불어 코로나19 팬데믹으로 인한 생활물류 서비스 수요가 증가함에 따라 소규모 물류시설의 개발이 급증하고 있다. 물류시설은 거대 배후도시를 가지며 교통이 편리한 경기도 내 특정 지역들을 중심으로 밀집되어 급속하게 증가하는 양상을 보이고 있다. 본 연구는 경기도의 안성시와 여주시, 이천시의 3개 지자체에서 개발된 총 259개의 물류시설을 조사하여 개발규모와 개발방식, 용적률, 용도지역 등의 개발 특성을 분석하였다. 특정지역에 밀집되어 개발되는 물류시설은 비도시지역에서 난개발 형태로 이루어지고 있으며, 국토환경의 훼손과 사회적 갈등을 야기하고 있다. 본 연구는 물류시설 개발로 야기되는 난개발과 환경영향, 주민과의 갈등 등의 문제점을 해결할 수 있는 제도적 개선방안과 친환경적 개발을 위한 평가 가이드라인을 제안하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 한국환경연구원의 2022년도 수시과제 「도시물류시설의 수요 및 환경 입지 적정성 평가 방안(2022-16)」의 지원으로 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. ADLogis. 2022. Anseong Wongok Sanha 6 District Urban Management Plan (district-unit planning zones) SEA report. pp. 155-415. [Korean Literature]
  2. Anseong IlJuk Development. 2015. Anseong Iljuk Neungguk District-unit Planning SEA report. pp. 164-189. [Korean Literature]
  3. Anseong-si. 2015. 2030 Anseong Urban Master Plan, p. 126. [Korean Literature]
  4. Gyeonggi-do Losistics and Ports Division. 2022. Actual demand verification status for logistics complexes in 2020-2022 in Gyeonggi-do. [Korean Literature]
  5. Joo Y-J, Sagong H, Lee SY, Lee H-S, Kang W-J. 2022. A Study on Assessing the Site Selection of Urban Logistics Facilities Focusing on Demand and Environmental Factors, Korea Environment Institute, pp. 12-13. [Korean Literature]
  6. Kim ES, Lee MH. 2021. A Study on the Current Status and Demand Forecast of Logistics Facilities in Incheon, The Incheon Institute, pp. 53-62. [Korean Literature]
  7. Korean Law Information Center, Regulation of Permission for Development Activities; [cited 2023 Nomember 25]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr [Korean Literature]
  8. Korean Law Information Center, National Ladn Planning and Utilization ACT; [cited 2023 Nomember 25]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr [Korean Literature]
  9. Ministry of Environment. 2022. Regulations on the preparation, etc. of environmental impact assessment, etc, p. 35. [Korean Literature]
  10. Ministry of Environment. 2023. Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment Manual, p. 43. [Korean Literature]
  11. National Logistics Information Center, Performance of living logistics by year, [cited 2023 Nomember 25]. Available from: http://www.nlic.go.kr [Korean Literature]
  12. NewOK Development. 2022. Anseong Dukyo Secondly District Urban Management Plan(district-unit planning zones) SEA report. p. 35, p. 556. [Korean Literature]