Food Science and Preservation (한국식품저장유통학회지)

The Korean Society of Food Preservation (한국식품저장유통학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality characteristics of plant-based whipped cream with ultrasonicated pea protein

  • Insun Kim (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwang-Deog Moon (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2023.11.16
  • Accepted : 2024.02.02
  • Published : 2024.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The rise in popularity of vegetarian and plant-based diets has led to extensive research into plant-based whipped creams. Whipped cream is an oil-in-water emulsion that creates foam through whipping, stabilizing the foam with proteins and fats. Pea protein is an excellent emulsifier and foaming agent among plant-based proteins, but its application in whipped cream is currently limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the quality characteristics of plant-based whipped cream made with ultrasonicated pea protein. The whipped creams were evaluated based on their quality characteristics. A commercially available dairy whipped cream (CON) was used as a control. Plant-based creams were evaluated using pea protein solution, cocoa butter, and canola oil to produce un-ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream (PP) and ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream (UPP) at 360 W for 6 min. UPP significantly reduced whipping time and foam drainage compared with CON and PP, resulting in significantly increased overrun, fat destabilization, and hardness. Optical microscopy showed that UPP had smaller fat globules and bubble size than PP. The fat globules of UPP and CON were mostly below 5 ㎛, whereas those of PP were distributed at 5-20 ㎛. Finally, ultrasonication significantly improved the overrun, foam drainage, fat destabilization, and hardness of UPP, which are significant quality characteristics of whipped creams. Therefore, ultrasonicated plant-based pea protein whipped cream is believed to be a viable alternative to dairy whipped cream.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Whipped cream is one of the dairy products commonly used in desserts, cakes, pastries, and ice creams. It has a fat content of approximately 30%-40% and is an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion that produces foam through the whipping process (Li et al., 2020b; Sajedi et al., 2014). The properties and texture of whipped creams are influenced by several factors, including good whipping ability, overrun, stability, and firmness (Rezvani et al., 2020). The quality of whipped creams depends on the destabilization of fats for crystallization, as the foam structure of whipped cream is stabilized by partially coalesced fat globules (Wu et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022). Partial coalescence only occurs when two or more fat globules collide to form crystalline links in a crystalline fat-containing O/W emulsion (Liu et al., 2021). Proteins and fat globules both contribute to the formation and stabilization of foam in whipped cream (Sajedi et al., 2014).

Recombinant plant-based creams have been widely used in the food industry, including dairy products, beverages, and confectionery, to address the issue of dairy products being unsuitable for some individuals, such as those with lactose intolerance and milk protein allergies (Fu et al., 2020). However, it is important to note that recombinant plant-based whipped creams are typically manufactured from hydrogenated vegetable fats, which contain trans fats and may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer (Cao et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2019). In comparison, cocoa butter and canola oil are natural fats obtained from cocoa seeds (Theobroma cacao) and canola from the Brassicaceae family.

Recently, there has been a growing interest in utilizing sustainable plant-based proteins as functional ingredients in foods due to consumer demand for “clean labels” (Moll et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2018). This is in response to concerns about animal welfare and the increased greenhouse emissions associated with animal-based proteins (Kumar et al., 2022). Animal agriculture for animalbased protein is a leading cause of deforestation, freshwater utilization, eutrophication, and direct greenhouse gas emissions (Djekic et al., 2014; Theurl et al., 2020). Peas (Pisum sativum L.) are a good source of bioactive peptides due to their high nutritional value and lysine content. Peas are composed of 25% protein, 55%-68% starch, and 6.5% fiber (Burger and Zhang, 2019). Pea proteins can be classified into the following four groups: globulin, albumin, prolamin, and glutelin (Lu et al., 2020). At neutral pH, pea proteins are superior emulsifiers and foaming agents compared to soy proteins (Aluko et al., 2009). Therefore, they can effectively function as emulsifiers and foaming agents in plant-based whipped creams. The functional attributes of proteins, such as emulsification, foam formation, viscosity, and gelation, are closely related to their structural configurations (Di et al., 2022). Altering the structural framework of proteins can significantly enhance their functional efficacy (Sajedi et al., 2014). Therefore, to modify the structure of proteins, various methods including ultrasound, pH-shifting, alkali, and enzymes have been applied. Previous studies have shown that ultrasonic treatment significantly improves the solubility, water/oil holding capacity, foaming, and emulsifying capacity of pea protein (Zhao et al., 2022). Similarly, pH-shifting treatment at pH 11 has been found to significantly increase the solubility, emulsifying, and foaming properties of faba bean protein isolates (Alavi et al., 2021).

Ultrasound refers to pressure waves with frequencies above 20 kHz and is defined as sound waves with frequencies above the threshold of human hearing (>16 kHz) (Bariya et al., 2023; Muñoz et al., 2021). Ultrasonication of proteins can alter the physicochemical properties of various protein sources, including soy protein, pea protein, and egg white protein (OSullivan et al., 2016). Several recent studies have demonstrated that highintensity ultrasound can improve the solubility, emulsification, foaming, and gelling properties of proteins (Zhu et al., 2018). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the quality characteristics of plant-based whipped creams based on ultrasonicated pea proteins and their potential to replace dairy whipped creams.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Isolated pea protein (PPI) (Almi GmbH, Oftering, Austria), cacao butter (Europe Chocolate Company N.V., Westmalle, Belgium), and canola oil (Ottogi Co. Ltd., Anyang, Korea) were used as ingredients for the plant-based whipped cream. The PPI was contained of 80 g of protein, 3 g of carbohydrate, 8.3 g of fat and 2.2 g of salt per 100 g (Almi GmbH). The control used as a control was dairy whipping cream (Maeil Dairies Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea). The dairy whipping cream was contained of 2 g of protein, 3.5 g of carbohydrate and 38 g of fat (Maeil Dairies Co. Ltd.).

2.2. Plant-based whipped cream preparation

The plant-based whipped cream is prepared using different types of proteins and fats from the control, as shown in Table 1. The samples using pea protein were named ultrasonication (UPP) and no ultrasonication (PP) depending on whether they were ultrasonicated or not.

Table 1. The formulation of plant-based pea protein whipped cream

SPOSBX_2024_v31n1_64_t0001.png 이미지

The protein solution was prepared by hydrating the PPI through magnetic stirring for 1 h at 20- 30℃. After hydration, the UPP samples to be ultrasonicated were treated at an intensity of 360 W at a frequency of 24 kHz for 6 min using an ultrasonic machine (BKUP-900K, Bio Koncision Inc., Gwacheon, Korea) equipped with a 13 mm probe. The ultrasonic time used in this study was chosen based on the difference in protein properties, such as protein solubility, emulsifying activity index, and foam capacity, as well as whipped cream properties, including overrun and foam drainage. These results were obtained from our preliminary studies, as presented in Fig. S1, Fig. S2, and Fig. S3. Ultrasonication was performed with the probe submerged approximately 1.5 cm in the protein solution, and the samples were immersed in an ice water bath to prevent their temperature from rising during the treatment.

Cocoa butter and canola oil were dissolved in a water bath (JSIB-22T, JS Research Inc., Gongju, Korea) at 50℃ for 30 min. The cream was prepared by mixing the hydrated protein solution with the dissolved oil phase using a hand mixer (HR2535/00, Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) at 14,900 rpm for 2 min The temperature was maintained at approximately 50℃. The cream was then aged for 24 h at 4℃.

Sample 100 g was refrigerated at 4℃ for 24 h and then whipped using a digital hand mixer (LW-2003 A, Llantek Electrical Appliances Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China) at stage 13, which provides 360 W.

2.3. Determination of moisture content

The moisture content change was measured by weighing 3 g of the sample according to the normal pressure drying method, spreading it on an aluminum dish, and drying it in a 105℃ dry oven (JSOF-100, JS Research Inc.) for 5 h, and subsequently cooling it in a desiccator for 30 min. Following measurement, the results were expressed as percentages (%) according to the following equation:

\(\begin{align}\text {Moisture content}(\%)=\frac{W_{1}-W_{0}}{W_{0}} \times 100\end{align}\)       (1)

W0: the initial weight of the sample.

W1: the weight of the sample after drying.

2.4. pH measurement

The pH was measured using a pH meter (Orion 3 star, Thermo Electron Co., Waltham, MA, USA).

2.5. Measurement of color value

After whipping, whipped creams were stored in a petri dish (50×15 mm) at 4℃ for 24 h before measuring the L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) values of the surface using a colorimeter (CR-400, Konica Minolta Co., Osaka, Japan) calibrated with a standard white plate (L*=92.83, a* =-1.88, and b*=9.11). Each sample was measured five times, and the average value was shown.

2.6. Determination of whipping time

The whipping time that produces the best results was determined by visually assessing the cream. The optimal whipping time is when the cream holds its shape and does not immediately flow around the wire (Zeng et al., 2021).

2.7. Measurement of overrun

The method of Rezvani et al. (2020) was used to measure the overrun. To compare the masses for the same volume, the masses were compared by filling the same container. Excess cream was removed from the container using a metal scraper, and a constant volume of whipped cream was weighed. The overrun was calculated using the following equation:

\(\begin{align}\text {Overrun}(\%)=\frac{\text {Weight of un whipped ceam - Weight of whipped cream}} {\text {Weight of whipped cream}}{\times} 100\end{align}\)       (2)

2.8. Measurement of foam drainage

Twenty grams of freshly whipped cream were placed in a funnel lined with microfiber paper (WM.1004110, Whatman Inc., Maidstone, UK) and placed in a thermostat (JSRH-150CP, JS Research Inc.) at 25℃ for 4 h. The rate of foam drainage was calculated using the following equation (Rezvani et al., 2020):

\(\begin{align}\text {Foam dreainage}(\%)=\frac{\text {Weight of serum collected}}{\text {Weight of whipped cream}} \times 100\end{align}\)       (3)

2.9. Measurement of fat destabilization

Fat destabilization was measured using the turbidimetric method based on the method of Petrut et al. (2016). Two samples were used, one from unwhipped emulsion and one from whipped cream, diluted at a ratio of 1:300. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 540 nm using a spectrophotometer (Evolution 201, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The amount of light absorbed depended on the size and number of fat globules dispersed in the diluent. The fat destabilization rate was calculated using the following equation:

\(\begin{align}\text {Fat destabilization}(\%)=\frac{A_{uw}-A_{w}}{A_{um}}\times 100\end{align}\)       (4)

Auw: the absorbance of the un whipped emulsion dilution.

Aw: the absorbance of the whipped cream dilution.

2.10. Measurement of optical microscope and fat globule size

The optical microscope (Leica ICC50 HD, Leica Microsystems Ltd., Heerbrugg, Switzerland) was used to observe the bubble distribution and fat globule particle size in the whipped cream. The bubble distribution was observed at 40× and the fat globule particle size was observed at 400× and measured in 200 random samples using ImageJ (Version 1.8.0, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.11. Texture profile analysis

Texture profile analysis was measured using a modified method of Gafour and Aly (2020). Whipped cream samples that were stored at 4℃ for 4 h were placed in a 25 mL beaker and subjected to a two-bite compression test using a texture profile analyzer (Compac-Ⅱ, Sun Scientific Co., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 20 mm diameter cylinder probe. The measurement conditions were as follows: table speed, 60 mm/min; load cell, 2 Kgf; distance, 3 mm; and clearance, 10 mm. The hardness, cohesiveness, springiness and adhesiveness of whipped cream were obtained.

2.12. Measurement of apparent viscosity

The apparent viscosity of the whipped cream was measured at 4℃ using a rheology rheometer (HR 10, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) based on the method of Yang et al. (2022). The samples’ apparent viscosity was measured at 1,000 μm intervals using a 20 mm plate at a constant temperature of 4℃ and a shear rate of 0.1-100 s -1 . Prior to measurement, all samples were equilibrated for 180 s, and 10 points per decade were measured per decade.

2.13. Measurement of viscoelastic properties

The viscoelastic properties of the whipped cream, including storage modulus (G'), loss modulus (G"), and tan δ, were measured using a rheology rheometer (HR 10, TA Instruments) based on the method of Yang et al. (2022). The measurements were taken at a constant temperature of 4℃ and a frequency range of 0.1-100 rad/s (strain rate, 0.1%). Prior to measurement, all samples were equilibrated for 180 s, and 10 points per decade were measured per decade.

2.14. Sensory evaluation

A sensory evaluation was conducted with 20 panelists, trained based on the method of Rezvani et al. (2020). Panelists assessed attributes such as appearance, color, flavor, firmness, and overall acceptability for each sample using a 7-point scale. Subjective indicators (1: very poor to 7: very good) were used for appearance, color, flavor, and overall acceptability, while objective indicators (1: very weak to 7: very strong) were used for firmness. The sensory evaluation was conducted safely and with final exemption from the Kyungpook National University Institutional Review Board (Approval number: KNU-2023-0485).

2.15. Statistical analysis

The results were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Moisture contents, pH, and color value

The moisture contents, pH, and color values of the whipped creams are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Moisture, pH and color value of dairy whipped cream and plant-based pea protein whipped cream

SPOSBX_2024_v31n1_64_t0002.png 이미지

1)CON, commercially available dairy whipped cream; PP, plant-based pea protein whipped cream; UPP, plant-based ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream.

2)Values are mean±SD (n=3).

3)Values are mean±SD (n=5).

4)a-cMeans significantly different between groups of storage period by Duncan’s multiple range test. (p<0.05).

The fat content of CON was 38%, while the plant-based pea protein whipped cream had a fat content of 30%, resulting in an approximate 8% difference in moisture content. No significant difference in the moisture content of the plantbased samples was observed since the same ingredient ratios were used.

No significant differences in pH levels were observed for any of the three samples, despite the CON and plant-based whipped creams having different ingredients. The plant-based samples did not differ, confirming that ultrasonication did not affect the pH level.

Depending on the proteins in the whipped cream, it is possible to change the colorimetry by modifying the size and surface properties of the particles, affecting light scattering, along with parameters that affect the partial coalescence and overrun of fat globules (Milovanovic et al., 2021). L* decreased in the order of CON, UPP, and PP. The volume of UPP increased due to its higher overrun compared to PP, resulting in an increase in L* (Balthazar et al., 2017). The order of decrease for a* was PP, CON, and UPP, which is consistent with the fat destabilization trend shown in Fig. 1. This is because fats, which are yellow in whipped creams, bind to proteins and become slightly green in color, thereby reducing their value (Rezvani et al., 2020). The increase in b* of whipped cream was in the order of CON, PP, and UPP. A significant difference was observed between dairy and plant-based pea protein whipped creams due to the effect of fat. The b* values were affected by carotenoids in milk fat for dairy whipped cream and cocoa butter for plant-based whipped creams (Samakradhamrongthai et al., 2021). Additionally, Table 3 shows that UPP is significantly more yellow than PP because UPP has smaller fat globules than PP (Stinco et al., 2012).

SPOSBX_2024_v31n1_64_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Foam drainage and fat destabilization of dairy whipped cream and plant-based pea protein whipped cream. In the codes listed; CON, commercially available dairy whipped cream; PP, plant-based pea protein whipped cream; UPP, plant-based ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream; Values are mean±SD (n=3); a-cMeans significantly different between groups of samples by Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).

Table 3. Whipping time, overrun, and fat globule size mean diameter of dairy whipped cream and plant-based pea protein whipped cream

SPOSBX_2024_v31n1_64_t0003.png 이미지

1)CON, commercially available dairy whipped cream; PP, plant-based pea protein whipped cream; UPP, plant-based ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream.

2)Values are mean±SD (n=3).

3)Values are mean±SD (n=200).

4)a-cMeans significantly different between groups of samples by Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).

3.2. Whipping time and overrun

The whipping time and overrun of the whipped creams are shown in Table 3.

Whipping time is determined by the extent of partial coalescence of fat globules in whipping cream (Dhungana et al., 2020). Excessive whipping can cause the foam to collapse and form butter granules (Li et al., 2020a). The whipping time of UPP is significantly shorter than that of PP. Li et al. (2020b) reported that ultrasonication resulted in smaller protein particle sizes, leading to a thinner interfacial layer of proteins covering the surface of the fat globules, which facilitated faster partial coalescence and reduced whipping time. This confirmed that ultrasonication had a positive effect on the plant-based pea protein whipped cream.

Overrun is the percentage increase in the volume of whipped cream due to air entrapment during the whipping process and is the ability of the emulsion to trap air bubbles during whipping (Fu et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2022). Nguyen et al. (2022) reported that the overrun depends on the following two factors: surface-mediated partial adhesion, which refers to the connection between fat globules on the surface of the foam, and foam adsorption on the surface of proteins, which reflects the foam-holding capacity of the protein portion in the whipped cream. The overruns shown in Table 3 are significantly lower for UPP, CON, and PP, respectively. The results are consistent with previous studies where ultrasonication increased the overrun due to the improvement of protein foaming properties (Yang et al., 2022).

3.3. Foam drainage

The foam drainage of the whipped cream is shown in Fig. 1. The foam drainage rate was used as an indicator to evaluate whipped cream stability (Dhungana et al., 2020). One of the main challenges in using whipped cream is the partial loss of cream serum during storage (Athari et al., 2021). Therefore, the cream with less drainage is more stable (Fu et al., 2020). According to Peng et al. (2018), the factors that affect foam stability are fat globules and protein. The results showed that PP had the highest drainage rate, which resulted in the worst foam stability. Conversely, UPP had a lower drainage rate than CON, confirming the superior foam stability of the ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream. The ultrasonication process allowed pea proteins to be rapidly adsorbed at the air–water and fat–water interfaces, which reduced fat globule particle size and improved foam stability (Liu et al., 2023).

3.4. Fat destabilization

The fat destabilization of the whipped creams is shown in Fig. 1. Whipped creams require the partial coalescence of fat crystal globules to enable the destabilization process necessary for bubble emulsions to form bubble trapped crystal structures (Petrut et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2022). The partially coalesced fat globules form a network to support the bubbles created during the whipping process, which constitutes the desired texture and stability of the final product (Wang et al., 2022). During the whipping process, fat globules partially destabilize, and high fat coalescence can occur, resulting in a higher overrun of whipped creams (Fu et al., 2020). The degree of fat destabilization decreases in the order of UPP, CON, and PP. This trend is consistent with a previous study (Fu et al., 2020), as shown in Table 2. According to Liu et al. (2021), small fat crystal aggregates have a positive effect on fat globule coalescence. Table 3 shows that the fat destabilization degree of UPP is affected by the small fat globule particle size of UPP. Ultrasonication effectively dissociated protein subunits, which increased the protein adsorption content at the fat interface and promoted partial adhesion (Yang et al., 2022).

3.5. Optical microscope and fat globule size

Fig. 2(A) shows the distribution of bubbles in the whipped cream at 40× magnification, and Fig. 2(B) shows the distribution of fat globules inside the whipped cream after whipping at 400×. The results indicate that CON and UPP have a high distribution of small bubbles, whereas PP retains larger bubbles compared with the other samples. This effect on bubble size is correlated with the fat destabilization and fat globule size (Liu et al., 2021). As shown in Fig. 2(B) and Table 3, fat globules are significantly increased in CON, UPP, and PP. It is noticeable that the fat globule particle size decreased more in UPP than that in PP after ultrasonication. The reduction in fat globules is likely due to the role of ultrasound-modified proteins, as the fat was not directly ultrasonicated in this study. Ultrasound can dissociate proteins into smaller units, which loosens their structure and enhances their interfacial adsorption activity at the fat-water interface, which can increase fat adhesion and affect fat particles (Silva et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2019; Zhong and Xiong, 2020). This study confirms that ultrasonication effectively reduces fat globule particle size, and ultimately, the smaller particle size positively affects foam drainage, making UPP the most stable whipped cream.

SPOSBX_2024_v31n1_64_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Optical micrograph of dairy whipped cream and plant-based pea protein whipped cream of the air cell (A, ×40) and the fat globules (B, ×400). In the codes listed; CON, commercially available dairy whipped cream; PP, plant-based pea protein whipped cream; UPP, plant-based ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream; scale bars indicate 200 μm (A) and 20 μm (B).

3.6. Texture profiles

Table 4 shows the values measured to analyze the texture characteristics of whipped creams, including hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness. Texture profile analysis is a widely used quality control tool in the food industry, and it is an essential for adapting whipped creams to foods affected by texture (Nguyen et al., 2015; Ningtyas et al., 2021). The hardness significantly decreased in the order of UPP, CON, and PP. If the whipped cream is not firm, it will not hold the weight of the topping when used in desserts and will run off and cannot be used for decoration, which is an important factor in the utilization of whipped cream (Goralchuk et al., 2020). Liu et al. (2021) reported that the higher degree of partial adhesion of fat globules, the higher the hardness as it forms a stronger network in the whipped cream, and it is effective in immobilizing air bubbles, so the results of this study showed a similar trend in fat destabilization and hardness. The springiness of whipped cream is a measure of its ability to return to its original condition after a deformation force is removed (Mohammadi et al., 2022). This property is influenced by the presence of proteins and fats. Ultrasonication was effective in reducing the size of protein particles and fat globules, resulting in improved springiness. Cohesiveness refers to the internal binding forces that make up whipped creams (Fu et al., 2020). Cohesiveness decreased significantly in the order of CON, UPP, and PP. Valdez-Hurtado et al. (2019) reported that the ultrasonication of proteins increased the crosslinking of the protein network, thereby resulting in a more cohesive gel. Therefore, ultrasonication increased the network of pea proteins in the whipped cream, resulting in a more cohesive whipped cream. Adhesiveness, a significant property of whipped cream, indicates its flowability or liquid state (Nguyen et al., 2015). The adhesion value decreased significantly in the order of UPP, CON, and PP. This difference may be attributed to variations in protein composition, which affects the overall protein surface properties (Ningtyas et al., 2021). Pea proteins’ surface hydrophobicity and zeta potential were enhanced by ultrasonication, two protein surface properties that positively influence emulsion stability (McCarthy et al., 2016; Qamar et al., 2019). It is worth noting that ultrasonication significantly improved the hardness and adhesiveness of whipped creams, which are essential textural properties.

Table 4. Texture profile analysis of dairy whipped cream and plant-based pea protein whipped cream

SPOSBX_2024_v31n1_64_t0005.png 이미지

1)CON, commercially available dairy whipped cream; PP, plant-based pea protein whipped cream; UPP, plant-based ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream.

2)Values are mean±SD (n=3).

3)a-cMeans significantly different between groups of samples by Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).

3.7. Apparent viscosity

The apparent viscosity of the whipped creams is shown in Fig. 3(A). A high apparent viscosity can prevent the escape of air bubbles and keep them stable. However, an excessively high viscosity cannot trap air during whipping, and a low viscosity cannot retain air bubbles (Wu et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022). Apparent viscosity is an important factor in consumer acceptability and organoleptic properties, and is closely related to consumer preferences, including overall mouthfeel. A high viscosity indicates that the cream moves less in the mouth, and the resistance to movement can cause a sticky feeling on the palate (Fu et al., 2020; Laguna et al., 2021). The apparent viscosity tended to decrease for all whipped creams as the shear rate increased. This is because as the shear rate increases. As the shear rate increases, hydrodynamic forces also increase, causing particles to deform and eventually collapse. This results in a decrease in viscosity (Ningtyas et al., 2021). The viscosity of whipped creams at a low shear rate decreased in the order of CON, UPP, and PP. Yang et al. (2022) reported that ultrasonication can induce dissociation of protein subunits and promote the formation of fat globule networks with enhanced emulsification properties. This results in ultrasonicated pea protein emulsions with higher apparent viscosity. According to Allen et al. (2006), Table 4 shows that higher springiness, one of the results of the texture profile analysis, corresponds to greater resistance to shear force before breakdown. Therefore, springiness and apparent viscosity tend to be similar.

SPOSBX_2024_v31n1_64_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. The rheological properties ((A) Apparent viscosity; (B) storage modulus (G'); (C) loss modulus (G"); (D) tan δ (G"/G')) of dairy whipped cream and plant-based pea protein whipped cream. In the codes listed; CON, commercially available dairy whipped cream; PP, plant-based pea protein whipped cream; UPP, plant-based ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream; n=3.

3.8. Viscoelastic properties (storage modulus, G'; loss modulus, G"; tan δ)

The storage modulus (G') and loss modulus (G") of the whipped creams is shown in Fig. 3 (B) and (C). The storage modulus (G') and loss modulus (G") represent the elastic and viscous behavior of the samples, respectively (Yang et al., 2022). The ratio of the storage modulus (G') to the loss modulus (G") is represented by tan δ (G"/G'). A value of tan δ1 indicates prominent viscous behavior (Farahmandfar et al., 2017). The storage modulus increases as the frequency increases. UPP has the highest results, followed by CON and PP, and then decreases at all frequencies. Emulsions with higher fat contents expectedly exhibit higher storage modulus, which may explain the higher storage modulus of CON, which has a higher fat content than PP (Farahmandfar et al., 2017). However, UPP has the highest storage modulus due to its high fat destabilization, which forms a tight network structure (Wu et al., 2023). The loss modulus, similar to the storage modulus and apparent viscosity, is higher than that of PP because ultrasonication induced protein loosening in the protein solution phase, resulting in a stiffer network structure (Yang et al., 2022). The tan δ values shown in Fig. 3(D) indicate that all samples have tan δ<1, suggesting that both dairy and plant-based pea protein whipped creams exhibit solid-like behavior (Yang et al., 2022). These properties are consistent with the rheological properties of previously investigated whipped creams (Farahmandfar et al., 2017; Long et al., 2016; Seo and Yoo, 2022). Despite the lack of fat content compared with CON, ultrasonication resulted in the formation of a more robust network than CON, indicating that ultrasonication not only had a positive effect on the viscoelastic behavior of whipped creams but also resulted in more robust foam.

3.9. Sensory evaluation

The results of the sensory evaluation are presented in Fig. 4. The results indicate that CON scored highest in appearance, color, and flavor, followed by UPP and PP. The firmness of whipped creams, evaluated as an element to assess the hardness of whipped creams, decreased significantly in the order of UPP, PP and CON. The TPA results in Table 4 show a similar trend to that of hardness. Additionally, UPP with higher fat destabilization indicated higher firmness because higher fat destabilization can increase partial fat adhesion to form a firm fat network. The overall acceptability was significantly lower in the order of CON, UPP, and PP.

SPOSBX_2024_v31n1_64_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Sensory test of dairy whipped cream and plant-based pea protein whipped cream. In the codes listed; CON, commercially available dairy whipped cream; PP, plant-based pea protein whipped cream; UPP, plant-based ultrasonicated pea protein whipped cream; Values are mean±SD (n=20); a-cmeans significantly different between groups of samples by Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).

This is consistent with previous research that has shown that color, flavor, and appearance are influential factors in sensory analysis (Chambers and Koppel, 2013; Santagiuliana et al., 2019; Sipos et al., 2021). The results suggest that ultrasonication is a useful processing method for sensory superior whipped creams, as UPP was significantly higher than PP in terms of color, flavor, and overall acceptability among the plant-based pea protein whipped creams.

4. Conclusions

This study analyzes the quality characteristics of plant-based whipped creams using ultrasonicated pea proteins and their potential as a replacement for dairy whipped creams. The chromaticity of whipped creams was affected by the fat globule size, with UPP having a higher b* value than PP, and UPP showed the best results due to the effect of ultrasonication on overrun, foam drainage and fat destabilization, which are significant factors in whipped creams. Moreover, the fat globule size was reduced in UPP compared with PP. However, CON had the smallest size, confirming the effect of ultrasonication as observed using optical microscopy. With respect to the rheological properties of whipped creams, ultrasonication improved hardness and adhesion and had a positive effect on apparent viscosity and viscoelastic properties. The sensory evaluation indicated that UPP had lower overall acceptability scores than CON but higher scores than PP. This confirms that ultrasonication is a significant treatment method for achieving sensory superiority in whipped creams. The results suggest that plant-based whipped creams made with ultrasonicated pea proteins have potential as an alternative to dairy whipped creams. This study can be used as a source of quality characteristics of plant-based whipped creams and as a method to improve the utilization of pea proteins through ultrasonication as an emulsifier and foaming agent.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials are only available online from: https://doi.org/10.11002/fsp.2024.31.1.64.

Funding

This research was supported by Kyungpook National University Development Project Research Fund, 2021.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Kim I, Moon KD. Methodology: Kim I. Formal analysis: Kim I. Validation: Kim I. Writing - original draft: Kim I. Writing - review & editing: Kim I, Moon KD.

Ethics approval

The sensory evaluation of this research was safely carried out with the approval of exemption (No. KNU-2023-0485) from the IRB of Kyungpook National University.

References

  1. Alavi F, Chen L, Wang Z, Emam-Djomeh Z. Consequences of heating under alkaline pH alone or in the presence of maltodextrin on solubility, emulsifying and foaming properties of faba bean protein. Food Hydrocoll, 112, 106335 (2021)
  2. Allen KE, Dickinson E, Murray B. Acidified sodium caseinate emulsion foams containing liquid fat: A comparison with whipped cream. LWT, 39, 225-234 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.02.004
  3. Aluko RE, Mofolasayo OA, Watts BM. Emulsifying and foaming properties of commercial yellow pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed flours. J Agric Food Chem, 57, 9793-9800 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902199x
  4. Athari B, Nasirpour A, Saeidy S, Esehaghbeygi A. Physicochemical properties of whipped cream stabilized with electrohydrodynamic modified cellulose. J Food Process Preserv, 45, e15688 (2021)
  5. Balthazar CF, Silva HLA, Vieira AH, Neto RPC, Cappato LP, Coimbra PT, Moraes J, Andrade MM, Calado VMA, Granato D, Freitas MQ, Tavares MIB, Raices RSL, Silva MC, Cruz AG. Assessing the effects of different prebiotic dietary oligosaccharides in sheep milk ice cream. Food Res Int, 91, 38-46 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.11.008
  6. Bariya AR, Rathod NB, Patel AS, Nayak JKB, Ranveer RC, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF, Ozogul F, Jambrak AR, Rocha JM. Recent developments in ultrasound approach for preservation of animal origin foods. Ultrason Sonochem, 101, 106676 (2023)
  7. Burger TG, Zhang Y. Recent progress in the utilization of pea protein as an emulsifier for food applications. Trends Food Sci Technol, 86, 25-33 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.007
  8. Cao Z, Liu Z, Zhang H, Wang J, Ren S. Protein particles ameliorate the mechanical properties of highly polyunsaturated oil-based whipped cream: A possible mode of action. Food Hydrocoll, 99, 105350 (2020)
  9. Chambers IV E, Koppel K. Associations of volatile compounds with sensory aroma and flavor: The complex nature of flavor. Molecules, 18, 4887-4905 (2013) https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18054887
  10. Dhungana P, Truong T, Bansal N, Bhandari B. Effect of fat globule size and addition of surfactants on whippability of native and homogenised dairy creams. Int Dairy J, 105, 104671 (2020)
  11. Di Y, Li X, Chang X, Gu R, Duan X, Liu F, Xuebo Liu, Wang Y. Impact of germination on structural, functional properties and in vitro protein digestibility of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) protein. LWT, 154, 112651 (2022)
  12. Djekic I, Miocinovic J, Tomasevic I, Smigic N, Tomic N. Environmental life-cycle assessment of various dairy products. J Clean Prod, 68, 64-72 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.054
  13. Farahmandfar R, Asnaashari M, Salahi MR, Khosravi Rad T. Effects of basil seed gum, cress seed gum and quince seed gum on the physical, textural and rheological properties of whipped cream. Int J Biol Macromol, 98, 820-828 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.046
  14. Fu L, He Z, Zeng M, Qin F, Chen J. Effects of soy protein composition in recombined soy-based cream on the stability and physical properties of whipping cream. J Sci Food Agric, 100, 2732-2741 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10305
  15. Gafour W, Aly E. Organoleptic, textural and whipping properties of whipped cream with different stabilizer blends. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment, 19, 425-433 (2020) https://doi.org/10.17306/J.AFS.0784
  16. Goff HD. Instability and partial coalescence in whippable dairy emulsions. J Dairy Sci, 80, 2620-2630 (1997) https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76219-2
  17. Goralchuk A, Gubsky S, Omel chenko S, Riabets O, Grinchenko O, Fedak N, Kotlyar O, Cheremska T, Skrynnik V. Impact of added food ingredients on foaming and texture of the whipped toppings: A chemometric analysis. Eur Food Res Technol, 246, 1955-1970 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03547-3
  18. Islam MA, Amin MN, Siddiqui SA, Hossain MP, Sultana F, Kabir MR. Trans fatty acids and lipid profile: A serious risk factor to cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr, 13, 1643-1647 (2019)
  19. Kumar, M, Tomar M, Potkule J, Punia S, Dhakane-Lad J, Singh S, Dhumal S, Pradhan PC, Bhushan B, Anitha T, Alajil O, Alhariri A, Amarowicz R, Kennedy JF. Functional characterization of plant-based protein to determine its quality for food applications. Food Hydrocoll, 123, 106986 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106986
  20. Laguna L, Fiszman S, Tarrega A. Saliva matters: Reviewing the role of saliva in the rheology and tribology of liquid and semisolid foods. Relation to in-mouth perception. Food Hydrocoll, 116, 106660 (2021)
  21. Li M, Li Y, Wang R, Wang Y, Li Y, Zhang L. Effects of triglycerol monostearate on physical properties of recombined dairy cream. Int Dairy J, 103, 104622 (2020a)
  22. Li Y, Li Y, Yuan D, Wang Y, Li M, Zhang L. The effect of caseins on the stability and whipping properties of recombined dairy creams. Int Dairy J, 105, 104658 (2020b)
  23. Liu L, Miao Y, Hu C, Gao L, He W, Chu H, Zhang T, Li C, Guo W. Effect of ultrasonic frequency on the structural and functional properties of pea protein isolation. J Sci Food Agric, 104, 1431-1440 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13025
  24. Liu P, Huang L, Liu T, Cai Y, Zeng D, Zhou F, Zhao M, Deng X, Zhao Q. Whipping properties and stability of whipping cream: The impact of fatty acid composition and crystallization properties. Food Chem, 347, 128997 (2021)
  25. Long Z, Zhao M, Sun-Waterhouse D, Lin Q, Zhao Q. Effects of sterilization conditions and milk protein composition on the rheological and whipping properties of whipping cream. Food Hydrocoll, 52, 11-18 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.06.015
  26. Lu ZX, He JF, Zhang YC, Bing DJ. Composition, physicochemical properties of pea protein and its application in functional foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 60, 2593-2605 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1651248
  27. McCarthy NA, Kennedy D, Hogan SA, Kelly PM, Thapa K, Murphy KM, Fenelon MA. Emulsification properties of pea protein isolate using homogenization, microfluidization and ultrasonication. Food Res Int, 89, 415-421 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.07.024
  28. Milovanovic B, Tomovic V, Djekic I, Miocinovic J, Solowiej BG, Lorenzo JM, Barba F, Tomasevic I. Colour assessment of milk and milk products using computer vision system and colorimeter. Int Dairy J, 120, 105084 (2021)
  29. Moll P, Grossmann L, Kutzli I, Weiss J. Influence of energy density and viscosity on foam stability: A study with pea protein (Pisum Sativum L.). J Dispers Sci Technol, 41, 1789-1796 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2019.1635028
  30. Munoz R, Viveros N, Bevilacqua A, Perez MS, Arevalo-Villena M. Effects of ultrasound treatments on wine microorganisms. Ultrason Sonochem, 79, 105775 (2021)
  31. Nguyen V, Duong CTM, Vu V. Effect of thermal treatment on physical properties and stability of whipping and whipped cream. J Food Eng, 163, 32-36 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.04.026
  32. Ningtyas DW, Bhandari B, Prakash S. Modulation fat globules of the plant-based cream emulsion: Influence of the source of plant proteins. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 74, 102852 (2021)
  33. OSullivan J, Murray B, Flynn C, Norton I. The effect of ultrasound treatment on the structural, physical and emulsifying properties of animal and vegetable proteins. Food Hydrocoll, 53, 141-154 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.02.009
  34. Peng F, He S, Yi H, Li Q, Xu W, Wang R, Ma Y. Physical, textural, and rheological properties of whipped cream affected by milk fat globule membrane protein. Int J Food Prop, 21, 1190-1202 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1460755
  35. Petrut RF, Danthine S, Blecker C. Assessment of partial coalescence in whippable oil-in-water food emulsions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 229, 25-33 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2015.12.004
  36. Qamar S, Bhandari B, Prakash S. Effect of different homogenisation methods and UHT processing on the stability of pea protein emulsion. Food Res Int, 116, 1374-1385 (2019)
  37. Rezvani F, Abbasi H, Nourani M. Effects of protein-polysaccharide interactions on the physical and textural characteristics of low-fat whipped cream. J Food Process Preserv, 44, e14743 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14743
  38. Sajedi M, Nasirpour A, Keramat J, Desobry S. Effect of modified whey protein concentrate on physical properties and stability of whipped cream. Food Hydrocoll, 36, 93-101 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.09.007
  39. Samakradhamrongthai RS, Jannu T, Supawan T, Khawsud A, Aumpa P, Renaldi G. Inulin application on the optimization of reduced-fat ice cream using response surface methodology. Food Hydrocoll, 119, 106873 (2021)
  40. Santagiuliana M, Bhaskaran V, Scholten E, Piqueras-Fiszman B, Stieger M. Don't judge new foods by their appearance! How visual and oral sensory cues affect sensory perception and liking of novel, heterogeneous foods. Food Qual Prefer, 77, 64-77 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.005
  41. Seo CW, Yoo B. Effect of milk protein isolate/κ-carrageenan conjugates on rheological and physical properties of whipping cream: A comparative study of maillard conjugates and electrostatic complexes. Food Sci Anim Resour, 42, 889-902 (2022) https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2022.e42
  42. Silva M, Zisu B, Chandrapala J. Interfacial and emulsification properties of sono-emulsified grape seed oil emulsions stabilized with milk proteins. Food Chem, 309, 125758 (2020)
  43. Sipos L, Nyitrai A, Szabo D, Urbin A, Nagy BV. Former and potential developments in sensory color masking: Review. Trends Food Sci Technol, 111, 1-11 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.050
  44. Stinco CM, Fernandez-Vazquez R, Escudero-Gilete ML, Heredia FJ, Melendez-Martinez AJ, Vicario IM. Effect of orange juices processing on the color, particle size, and bioaccessibility of carotenoids. J Agric Food Chem, 60, 1447-1455 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1021/jf2043949
  45. Theurl MC, Lauk C, Kalt G, Mayer A, Kaltenegger K, Morais TG, Teixeira RFM, Domingos T, Winiwarter W, Erb KH, Haberl H. Food systems in a zero-deforestation world: Dietary change is more important than intensification for climate targets in 2050. Sci Total Environ, 735, 139353 (2020)
  46. Valdez-Hurtado S, Lopez-Bermudez LS, Higuera-Barraza OA, Del Toro-Sanchez CL, Ruiz-Cruz S, Suarez-Jimenez MG, Marquez-Rios E. Effect of ultrasonication time on the functional properties of giant squid (Dosidicus gigas) mantle protein concentrate. Food Biosci, 27, 1-5 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2018.11.003
  47. Wang Z, Liang G, Chen W, Qie X, Fu L, Li X, He Z, Zeng M, Goff HD, Chen J. Effects of soy proteins and hydrolysates on fat globule coalescence and whipping properties of recombined low-fat whipped cream. Food Biophys, 17, 324-334 (2022)
  48. Wu S, Zhang Z, Liu C, Ma T. Effect of pH-shifting and sonication-assisted treatment on properties and stability of vegetable oil-based whipped cream stabilized by kidney bean protein aggregates. Food Hydrocoll, 141, 108736 (2023)
  49. Yang K, Lin R, Zhang S, Zhao X, Jiang J, Liu Y. Ultrasound-modified interfacial properties and crystallization behavior of aerated emulsions fabricated with pH-shifting treated pea protein. Food Chem, 367, 130536 (2022)
  50. Yang T, Liu TX, Li XT, Tang CH. Novel nanoparticles from insoluble soybean polysaccharides of Okara as unique Pickering stabilizers for oil-in-water emulsions. Food Hydrocoll, 94, 255-267 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.03.035
  51. Zeng D, Cai Y, Liu T, Huang L, Liu P, Zhao M, Zhao Q. Effect of sucrose ester S370 on interfacial layers and fat crystals network of whipped cream. Food Hydrocoll, 113, 106541 (2021)
  52. Zhao Q, Xie T, Hong X, Zhou Y, Fan L, Liu Y, Li J. Modification of functional properties of perilla protein isolate by high-intensity ultrasonic treatment and the stability of o/w emulsion. Food Chem, 368, 130848 (2022)
  53. Zhong Z, Xiong YL. Thermosonication-induced structural changes and solution properties of mung bean protein. Ultrason Sonochem, 62, 104908 (2020)
  54. Zhu Z, Zhu W, Yi J, Liu N, Cao Y, Lu J, Decker EA, McClements DJ. Effects of sonication on the physicochemical and functional properties of walnut protein isolate. Food Res Int, 106, 853-861 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.060