International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Features of the Discussion Method in the Training of Students in the Context of Distance Learning

  • Received : 2023.11.05
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The article considers online discussion as an interactive learning method in the conditions of distance learning. The essence of discussion and the stages of its organization are described. The main objective of discussion in distance learning is defined as the stimulation of interest in learning and the involvement of various viewpoints in an active discussion of the stated problems. The key role in ensuring the efficiency of a discussion is identified. The article develops a model for organizing asynchronous online discussions on the Moodle platform, highlighting the sequence of stages and their content. An experimental study of the use of the discussion method in the training of students in distance learning conditions is carried out. Based on the results of the methodological experiment, conclusions are drawn about student interest in online discussions. The authors conclude that the interest of students of different specialties in asynchronous online discussions varies, and the greatest interest is demonstrated by linguistics students. Nevertheless, the differences in student interest in online discussions by groups (specialties) are more likely attributable to subjective factors, which do not affect the overall picture in a major way.

Keywords

References

  1. Otrokov, O. Yu., Gasanbekov, S. K., Azmetova, R. F., Vilisova, M. L., Demina, T. Yu., Panova, A. G.: Career choices and young adults: The influence of the autonomy factor on the choice of employment in the IT sector. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 22(9), 569-574 (2022) https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.9.73
  2. Ramazanova, D., Togaibayeva, A., Yessengulova, M., Baiganova, A., Yertleuova, B.: Using Instagram to raise the effectiveness of distance learning in English: The experience of Kazakhstani students. Frontiers in Education 7, 923507 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.923507
  3. Pivneva, S. V., Korotkikh, O. A., Fedorov, A. G., Adygezalova, G. E., Rets, N. I., Sekerin, V. D.: Features of the legal regulation of relations in the provision of educational services via distance learning technologies. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 22(9), 581-586 (2022) https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.9.75
  4. Gladilina, I. P., Pankova, L. N., Sergeeva, S. A., Kolesnik, V., Vorontsov, A.: Use of information and computer-based distance learning technologies during COVID-19 active restrictions. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 13(6), 748-753 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130688
  5. Kamarianos, I., Adamopoulou, A., Lambropoulos, H., Stamelos, G.: Towards and understanding of university students' response in times of pandemic crisis (COVID-19). European Journal of Education Studies 7(7), 20-40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i7.3149
  6. Hernandez de Velazco, J. J., Ravina Ripoll, R., Chumaceiro Hernandez, A. C.: Relevance and social responsibility of sustainable university organizations: Analysis from the perspective of endogenous capacities. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 7(4), 2967-2977 (2020) https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(26)
  7. Titenkova, O. S., Nedosugova, A. B., Afanasieva, A. V., Kolganov, S., Lobanova, V. V., Latysheva, S. Yu.: Influence of the teacher evaluation system on the quality of education in the context of the development of distance learning. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 22(9), 569-574 (2022).
  8. Satkeeva, A. B., Ulanova, K. L., Filistova, N. Y., Galizina, E. G., Fedotkina, E. V.: Tecnologias da informacao e comunicacoes a distancia na avaliacao dos resultados de aprendizagem em estudantes de linguistica [Information and communications technology in distance assessment of learning outcomes in linguistics students]. Revista EntreLinguas 8(esp.1), e022004 (2022) https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v8iesp.1.16914
  9. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J.: COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 3(1), 9-28 (2020).
  10. Yu, S., Frolova, S., Afanasyev, O., Ilinskaya, Y., Fatkullina, A., Rabadanova, R.: Opportunities to improve the professional qualities of teachers to work in the distance mode of teaching. Revista Conrado 18(86), 14-20 (2022).
  11. Togaibayeva, A., Ramazanova, D., Yessengulova, M., Yergazina, A., Nurlin, A., Shokanov, R.: Effect of mobile learning on students' satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and academic performance when learning a foreign language. Frontiers in Education 7, 946102 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.946102
  12. Ermolaeva, E. O., Sekerin, V. D., Gorokhova, A. E., Orlova, I. K., Kokhanovskaya, I. I., Maslennikova, E. G.: The use of open scientific and educational resources as a means of improving the information and research competence and quality of university teaching staff. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science 12(4), 517-234 (2022) https://doi.org/10.31407/ijees12.466
  13. Zeldovich, B. Z., Speranskaia, N. M.: Aktivnye metody obucheniia [Active learning methods]. Iurait, Moscow, 201 pp. (2021).
  14. Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., Alexander, J. F.: Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students' comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 101(3), 740-764 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
  15. Romanova, E. S., Litvinenko, V. I.: Tekhnologii professionalno orientirovannogo obucheniia [Technologies of professionally oriented education]. Knorus, Moscow, 230 pp. (2021).
  16. Billings, L., Fitzgerald, J.: Dialogic discussion and the paideia seminar. American Educational Research Journal 39(4), 907-941 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039004905
  17. Aniskina, L. V.: Diskussiia kak organizatsionnaia forma uchebnogo dialoga [Discussion as an organizational form of educational dialogue]. Bulletin of Penza State University 6(10), 128-131 (2018).
  18. Henning, J. E.: Leading discussion: Opening up the conversation. College Teaching 53(3), 90-94 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.3.90-94
  19. Shemwell, J. T., Furtak, E. M.: Science classroom discussion as scientific argumentation: A study of conceptually rich (and poor) student talk. Educational Assessment 15(3), 222-250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530563
  20. Efimova, S. V.: Uchebnaia diskussiia kak sposob perevoda znanii v umeniia [Classroom discussion as a way to translate knowledge into skills]. Siberian Trade and Economic Journal 1(19), 58-60 (2014).
  21. Gushchin, Iu. V.: Interaktivnye metody obucheniia v vysshei shkole [Interactive teaching methods in higher education]. Dubna Journal of Psychology 2, 1-18 (2012).
  22. Cornelius-White, J.: Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research 77, 113-143 (2007).
  23. Sybing, R.: Considerations for discussion activities for beginner EFL learners. Journal of the Nanzan Academic Society 98, 163-169 (2015).
  24. Abdulbaki, K., Suhaimi, M., Alsaqqaf, A., Jawad, W.: The use of the discussion method at university: Enhancement of teaching and learning. International Journal of Higher Education 7(6), 118-128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p118
  25. Morozova, I. G.: Ispolzovanie diskussii na zaniatiiakh inostrannogo iazyka v ramkakh problemnogo obucheniia pri podgotovke sovremennykh spetsialistov [The use of discussion in foreign language classes as part of problem-based learning in the training of modern specialists]. Inostrannye iazyki. Teoriia i praktika 1, 25-35 (2010).
  26. Mercer, N.: The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 1-14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853
  27. Atwood, S., Turnball, W., Carpendale, J. I. M.: The construction of knowledge in classroom talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences 19(3), 358-402 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481013
  28. Dambueva, A. B., Skokova, L. V.: Rol uchebnykh diskussii v formirovanii kompetentsii [The role of classroom discussions in the formation of competencies]. Scientific Notes: Electronic Scientific Journal of the Kursk State University 3(35), 103-108 (2015).
  29. Murzenko, L. V.: Uchebnaia diskussiia kak sredstvo formirovaniia mezhkulturnoi kompetentsii u studentov iazykovykh vuzov v usloviiakh distantsionnogo obrazovaniia [Classroom discussion as a means to develop intercultural competence among students of language universities in the conditions of distance learning]. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences 121, 197-201 (2010).
  30. Vasilkova, V. V.: Mini-diskussiia kak metod interaktivnogo obucheniia [Mini-discussion as an interactive learning method]. Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Series 12. Sociology 2, 97-103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu12.2016.208
  31. Stengel, M., Nolan, L., Donnick, D., Skym, W., Wright, A.: Best practices for teaching discussion as part of high school common core state standards. Journal of Communication Pedagogy 2, 111-118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31446/JCP.2019.20
  32. Biriyai, A. H., Thomas, E. V.: Online discussion forum: A tool for effective student-teacher interaction. International Journal of Applied Science 1(3), 111-116 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2525047
  33. Vijayavalsalan, B.: Students' impressions on the effectiveness of online discussion forums. Research in Social Sciences and Technology 3(1), 86-108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.03.01.6
  34. Chou, P.-N.: Teaching strategies in online discussion board: A framework in higher education. Education Studies 2(2), 25-30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p25
  35. Borodina, M., Ivashkina, T., Golubeva, T., Afanasiev, O., Pronina, Y., Berlov, K.: Changes in the use of the moodle platform by students at different levels of training depending on the period of restrictions due to Covid-19. Revista Conrado 18(88), 125-132 (2022).
  36. Baglione, S. L., Nastanski, M.: The superiority of online discussion faculty perceptions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 8(2), 139-150 (2007).
  37. Flowers, J., Cotton, S. E.: Impacts of student categorization of their online discussion contributions. The American Journal of Distance Education 21(2), 93-104 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701299058
  38. Hemphill, L. S., Hemphill, H. H.: Evaluating the impact of guest speaker postings in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology 38(2), 287-293 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00622.x