Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Preservation Policy Framework of Data Repository: Focusing on CoreTrustSeal Certification

데이터 리포지토리의 보존 정책 프레임워크에 관한 연구 - CoreTrustSeal 인증을 중심으로 -

  • 이혜림 (한국과학기술정보연구원)
  • Received : 2023.10.25
  • Accepted : 2023.11.08
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study endeavors to delineate the essential components of digital preservation policies requisite for data repositories. Drawing from an examination of digital preservation policies from data repositories accredited by CoreTrustSeal in 2023, this study unveils the pivotal components intrinsic to a digital preservation policy framework, subsequently elucidating the content each component encompasses. The proffered framework is anticipated to serve as a foundational reference for institutions aiming to craft their digital preservation policies, transcending the confines of those solely pursuing CoreTrustSeal certification, to encompass both domestic and international institutions irrespective of their intent to seek CoreTrustSeal certification.

본 연구의 목적은 데이터 리포지토리가 갖추어야 할 디지털 보존 정책의 필수 구성요소를 파악하여 디지털 보존 정책의 프레임워크를 개발하는 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 2023년도에 CoreTrustSeal에서 인증을 받은 데이터 리포지토리들의 디지털 보존 정책을 비교 분석하여 디지털 보존 정책 프레임워크에 필요한 구성요소를 추출하고, 각 구성요소에서 어떠한 내용을 포함하고 있는지를 연구 결과로 제시하였다. 본 연구에서 제시한 디지털 보존 정책 프레임워크는 CoreTrustSeal에서 인증을 받고자 하는 기관들뿐만 아니라 CoreTrustSeal 인증을 신청할 계획이 없는 국내외 기관들에서도 그들의 디지털 보존 정책을 개발할 때 기초자료로 이용할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2023년도 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI)의 기본사업으로 수행된 연구임. (과제번호: (KISTI)K-23-L01-C03, (NTIS)1711198423)

References

  1. Ahn, Young-Hee & Park, Ok-Wha (2010). Development of a framework for digital curation policy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.1.201003.167
  2. Jung, Young-Mi, Yoon, Hwa-Mook, & Kim, Jeong-Taek (2010). A study on the preservation policy for maintaining the integrity of digital contents. Journal of Information Management, 41(4), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2010.41.4.205
  3. Kim, Juseop, Yang, Seongjun, & Kim, Suntae (2022). A study on data repository certificate scheme analysis and certification strategy: focused on CoreTrustSeal. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 56(2), 209-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2022.56.2.209
  4. Kwak, Seung-Jin, Choi, Jae-Hwang, Bae, Kyung-Jae, & Jung, Young-Mi (2011). A study on the policy on digital contents archiving in the field of science and technology. Journal of Korean Information Management, 42(4), 115-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.4.115
  5. Lee, Kyung-Nam & Lee, So-Yeon (2008). Developing agenda for electronic records long-term preservation and management. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 8(1), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2008.8.1.211
  6. Lee, So-Yeon (2013). Trends analysis of digital preservation research in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 13(2), 247-283. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.2.247
  7. Na, Yonwhee & Park, Heejin (2022). A study on the research trends of archival preservation papers in Korea from 2000 to 2021. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 22(4), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.4.175
  8. Park, Hyun-Young & Nam, Tae-Woo (2004). A study on digital archiving policy. Conference of the Korean Society for Information Management, 11, 69-76.
  9. Seo, Eun-Gyoung (2016). An analysis on digital preservation practices in academic libraries. Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 269-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.269
  10. Ahmad, R. & Rafiq, M. (2022). Global perspective on digital preservation policy: a systematic review. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221111572
  11. Beagrie, N. (1998). Developing a policy framework for digital preservation. Proceeding of the Sixth DELOS Workshop on Preservation of Digital Information. Tomar, Portugal.
  12. Beagrie, N., Williams, P., & Rettberg, N. (2008). Digital reservation policy: a subject of no importance?, iPRES, 1-4.
  13. Bode, E. C. (2013). Digital preservation policy of the chamber of deputies: methodology for its development. Proceedings of The Memory of the World in the Digital Age: Digitization and Preservation, 26-28.
  14. Brown, A. (2013). Practical Digital Preservation: A How-to Guide for Organization of Any Size. London: Facet Publishing.
  15. CoreTrsustSeal (2023a). Why certification. Available: https://www.coretrustseal.org/why-certification/
  16. CoreTrsustSeal (2023b). CoreTrustSeal Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements 2023-2025. Available: https://zenodo.org/record/7051012
  17. da Silva Junior, L. P. & Borges, M. M. (2017), Digital preservation policies of the institutional repositories at Brazilian Federal Universities. The Electronic Library, 35(2), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-09-2015-0170
  18. Dressler, V. A. (2017). The state of affairs with digital preservation at ARL member libraries: a survey and analysis of policy. Digital Library Perspectives, 33(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-08-2016-0030
  19. Electronic Resource Preservation and Access Network (ERPANET) (2003). Erpa Guidance: Digital Preservation Policy Tool. Available: https://www.erpanet.org/guidance/docs/ERPANETPolicyTool.pdf
  20. Gbaje, S. E. & Mohammed, Z. (2013). Digital preservation policy in National Information Centres in Nigeria. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2012-0011
  21. Katre, D. (2012). Need of legislation and digital preservation policy framework in Indian context. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 32(4), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.32.4.2526
  22. L'Hours, H., Kleemola, M., & de Leeuw, L. (2019). CoreTrustSeal: From academic collaboration to sustainable services. IASSIST Quarterly, 43(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq936
  23. LeFurgy, B. (2013). Analysis of Current Digital Preservation Policies: Archives, Libraries and Museums [Blog]. Available: https://blogs.loc.gov/thesignal/2013/08/analysis-of-current-digital-preservation-policies-archives-libraries-and-museums/
  24. Library and Archives Canada (2014) Stewardship Policy Framework. Canada: Library and Archives Canada.
  25. Matlala, M. E., Ncube, T. R., & Parbanath, S. (2022). The state of digital records preservation in South Africa's public sector in the 21st century: a literature review. Records Management Journal, 32(2), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-02-2021-0004
  26. McGovern, N. Y. (2004). Cornell University Library Digital Preservation Policy Framework. NY: Cornell University Library. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/1813/11230
  27. National Archives of Australia (2021). Preservation Policy 2021-2025. Available: https://www.naa.gov.au/about-us/our-organisation/accountability-and-reporting/archival-policy-and-planning/preservation-policy-2021-2025
  28. Newhart, M. & Patten, M. L. (2023). Understanding Research Methods (11th ed.). UK: Routledge.
  29. Noonan, D. (2014). Digital preservation policy framework: a case study. EDUCAUSE Review. Available: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/7/digital-preservation-policy-framework-a-case-study
  30. Oliver, G. & Harvey, R. (2016). Digital Curation (2nd ed.). Chicago: Neal-Schuman.
  31. Patten, M. L. (2017). Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials (10th ed). UK: Routledge.
  32. Research Libraries Group (2002). Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities. CA: RLG.
  33. Sheldon, M. (2013). Analysis of Current Digital Preservation Policies: Archives, Libraries, and Museums. Avaliable: https://blogs.loc.gov/thesignal/2013/08/analysis-of-current-digital-preservation-policies-archives-libraries-and-museums/
  34. Xie, S. L. (2008). A foundation for developing digital preservation policy: the InterPARES policy framework. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 24(1), 1-12.