한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도서관협력수업의 통합모형 제안에 관한 연구

A Study on the Proposal of an Integration Model for Library Collaboration Instruction

  • 이병기 (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.22
  • 심사 : 2023.10.30
  • 발행 : 2023.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

도서관협력수업은 사서교사와 교과교사가 공동으로 수업을 계획하고, 공동으로 수업을 전개하며, 공동으로 평가하는 과정이다. 도서관협력수업은 협력의 수준, 정보활동, 시간표 운영 등 다양한 차원에서 연구되고 모델이 개발되어 왔다. 그럼에도 도서관협력수업을 전체적으로 총괄하는 통합모형이 개발되어 있지 않다. 본 연구는 5가지 차원(협력수준, 정보활동, 협력접근, 시간운영, 기술통합)에서 다양한 모형을 비교·분석하여 도서관협력수업의 모형을 도식적으로 제안하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 제안한 도서관협력수업 통합모형의 주요 내용은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 협력수준 차원에서, 통합모형은 도서관활용 교사수업, 범 교과 통합교육과정 등을 반영하였다. 둘째, 정보활동 차원에서, 통합모형에는 정보활용과정과 더불어 사회 및 과학교과 탐구활동을 반영하였다. 셋째, 협력접근 차원에서 통합모형은 주도-관찰수업, 병렬 스테이션 수업 등으로 구분하였다. 넷째, 시간 운영 차원에서는 한국의 국가수준 교육과정과 시간표 편성 방식을 고려하였다. 다섯째, 기술통합의 차원에서, 통합모형은 PICRAT 모형을 도서관협력수업의 관점에서 수정, 반영하였다.

Library collaboration instruction (LCI) is a process in which a classroom teacher and librarian collaborate to co-planning, co-implementation, co-assessment instruction. LCI is being studied and modeled in various dimensions such as the level of collaboration, information activities, and time scheduling. However, there is no integrated model that comprehensively covers teacher and librarian collaboration. The purpose of this study is to propose a schematic integration model for LCI by comparing and analyzing various models in five dimensions (level of collaboration, information activities, collaborative approach, time scheduling, and technological integration). The main results of the integration model for LCI reflected in this study are as follows. First, in terms of the level of collaboration, TLC integration model reflected such as library-based teacher-led instruction, cross-curricular integrated curriculum. Second, in terms of information activities, LCI integration model reflected social and science subjects inquiry activities in addition to the information use process. Third, in terms of collaborative approach, LCI integration model is divided into such as lead-observation instruction and parallel station instruction. Fourth, in terms of time management, LCI integration model took into account the Korean national curriculum and scheduling methods. Fifth, in terms of technology integration, LCI integration model reflected the PICRAT model, modified from the perspective of library collaboration instruction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Han, Soo Hee (2011). Developing an english teaching model using block scheduling. Secondary English Education, 4(1), 141-172.
  2. Heo, Ju (2017). Increase Teacher Professionalism and Help Change Classes. Korea Education Newspaper. Available: https://www.hangyo.com/news/article.html?no=83088
  3. Korean Library Association (2013). Standards for Korean Libraries. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  4. Lee, Byeong Kee (2006). A study on the model of library assisted instruction based on information activities. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(2), 25-46.
  5. Lee, Byeong Kee (2020). Information Literacy Instruction (3rd ed.). daegu: Taeilsa.
  6. Ministry of Education in Korea (2003). Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  7. National Curriculum Information Center (2023). Curriculum Full-Text and Guide Books. Available: https://ncic.re.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do
  8. Noh, Jin-Young, Byun, Woo-Yeol, & Lee, Byeong Kee (2009). A study on the design of inquiry instruction model by information literacy instruction in school library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1), 471-492.
  9. Ok, il-nam (2012). Understanding of inquiry activity in high school social studies textbooks. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 44(1), 51-90. https://doi.org/10.35557/trce.44.1.201203.003
  10. Park, Jong-gu (2013). Extended Technology Acceptance Model; New Media Adoption Theory. Available: https://terms.naver.com/entry.naver?docId=1691791&cid=42171&categoryId=42174
  11. Song, Shin-Cheol & Shim, Kew Cheol (2018). Analysis of inquiry activity types in the integrated science textbooks for high school students. Biology Education, 46(1), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2018.46.1.24
  12. AASL & AECT (1998). Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago: ALA.
  13. AASL & AECT(Association for Educational Communications and Technology) (1988). Information Power: Guidelines for School Library Media Programs. Chicago: ALA.
  14. AASL (2009b). Standards for the 21st-Century Learner in Action. Chicago: ALA.
  15. AASL(American Association of School Librarians) (2009a). Position Statement on Flexible Scheduling. Available: https://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/aaslproftools/positionstatements/aaslpositionstatement.htm
  16. Buzzeo, T. (2002). Collaborating to Meet Standards: Teacher/library Media Specialist Partnerships for K-6. Worthington, OH: Linworth.
  17. Callison, D. (1997). Expanding collaboration for literacy promotion in public and school libraries. Journal of Youth Services 11(3), 37-48.
  18. Cook, L. & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-17.
  19. Deusen, Van, Donham, Jean, & Tallman, Julie I. (1994). The impact of scheduling on curriculum consultation and information skills instruction. School Library Media Quarterly, 23(1), 17-25.
  20. Donham, J. (1999). Collaboration in the media center: building partnerships for learning. NASSP Bulletin, 83(605), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659908360504
  21. Eisenberg, M. B. & Berkowitz, R. E. (1990). Information Problem-Solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library and Information Skills Instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  22. Friend, M. & Bursuck, W. D. (2009). Co-teaching Approaches. From Including Students with Special Needs: A Practical Guide for Classroom Teachers (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  23. Harada, Violet H. & Yoshina, Joan M. (2004). Inquiry Learning Through Librarian-Teacher Partnerships. Worthington, Ohio: Linworth Pub.
  24. Haycock, K. (1998). The impact of scheduling on cooperative program planning and teaching and information skills instruction. School Libraries in Canada, 18(3), 20-23.
  25. Hughes, J. E. (2000). Teaching English with Technology: Exploring Teacher Learning and Practice. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, United States.
  26. IFLA (2015). IFLA School Library Guidelines (2nd revised ed.) Available: https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/school-libraries-resource-centers/publications/ifla-school-library-guidelines.pdf
  27. IFLA, UNESCO (2002). The IFLA/UNESCO School Library Guidelines. Available: https://archive.ifla.org/VII/s11/pubs/sguide02.pdf
  28. Joyce, Marilyn Z. & Tallman, Julie I. (1997). Making the Writing and Research Connection with the I-search Process. New York: Neal-Schuman.
  29. Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176-198.
  30. Loertscher, D. V. (1982). Second revolution: a taxonomy for the 1980s. Wilson Library Bulletin, 56(1), 412-421.
  31. Loertscher, D. V. (1988). Taxonomies of the School Library Media Program. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  32. Loertscher, D. V. (2000). Taxonomies of the School Library Media Program (2nd ed.). San Jos, CA: Hi Willow Research and Publishing.
  33. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation(LoTi): a framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(1), 40-42.
  34. Montiel-Overall, P. (2005a). Toward a theory of collaboration for teachers and librarians. School Library Media Research, 8(1), 1-31.
  35. Montiel-Overall, P. (2005b). A theoretical understanding of teacher and librarian collaboration (TLC). School Libraries Worldwide, 11(2), 24-48. https://doi.org/10.29173/slw6962
  36. Oberg, D. (1990). Cooperative program planning. School Libraries in Canada, 11(1), 7-10.
  37. Pugach, M. & Johnson, L. J. (1995). Collaborative Practitioners Collaborative Schools. Denver, Colo.: Love.
  38. Roblyer, M. D (2006). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  39. S.O.S. for Information Literacy Project Teams (2023). S.O.S. for Information Literacy: A Virtual Idea Factory for Teaching Information Literacy Skills. Available: http://www.informationliteracy.org/
  40. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1996). Leadership for the Schoolhouse. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  41. Shaw, Marie Keen (1999). Block Scheduling and Its Impact on the School Library Media Center. Westport, Connect: Greenwood Press.
  42. Stein, Barbara L & Brown, Risa W. (2002). Running School Library Media Center ( 2nd ed.). New York: Neal-Schuman Pub.
  43. TQEC(Teacher Quality Enhancement Center, St. Cloud State University) (2011). Available: https://louisville.edu/education/field-placement/files/co-teaching-strategies-and-examples.pdf