DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Roles of Digital Exhibition in Enhancing Immersive Experience and Purchase Intention

  • Sojung Yoon (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota) ;
  • Nam Ji Eum (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota) ;
  • Jai-Yeol Son (Information Systems at Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2022.07.16
  • Accepted : 2022.12.14
  • Published : 2023.03.31

Abstract

Museums in modern society serve to a broader public than their early predecessors. In response to such transition, many art museums now open digital exhibitions to provide immersive experience and maximize user interaction. This study aims to find facilitators of mass popularity in the field of art by identifying the effect of specific features of digital exhibitions - animated image and storytelling description - on museum visitors' immersive experience and willingness-to-pay price premium (WTP). By performing an online-based two (art types: still image vs. animated image) by two (description types: informative description vs. storytelling description) experiment, we find that animated images and storytelling description enhance experiential value and imagery vividness, the two aspects of immersion, and WTP. Furthermore, the impact of digital exhibition on visitors' immersive experience and WTP is stronger when animated images and storytelling description are adopted together. This paper contributes to both IS literature and museum industry by identifying specific features and mechanism of digital exhibition that could enhance visitors' immersive art experience. By studying digital exhibition, which is not bound by physicality of artwork and exhibition space, this study also offers an empirical insight that advocate timely adoption of a "contactless" museum experience.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Yonsei University Research Fund of 2022 (2022-22-0051).

References

  1. Greene, J. P., Kisida, B., and Bowen, D. H. (2014). The educational value of field trips: Taking students to an art museum improves critical thinking skills, and more. Education Next, 14(1), 78-87. 
  2. Newsom, B. Y., and Silver, A. Z. (1978). The art museum as educator: A collection of studies as guides to practice and policy. Univ of California Press. 
  3. Stephen, A. (2001). The contemporary museum and leisure: Recreation as a museum function. Museum Management and Curatorship, 19(3), 297-308. 
  4. Schonfeld, R. C., and Sweeney, L. (2019). Organizing the work of the art museum. Ithaka S+ R. 
  5. Navarrete, T. (2019). Digital heritage tourism: innovations in museums. World Leisure Journal, 61(3), 200-214. 
  6. Rodney, S., Gouimenou, A., Mathey, A., and Mathey, A. (2015). How Museum Visitors Became Consumers. Retrieved from https://culture-communication.fr/en/how-museum-visitors-became-consumers/ 
  7. Pallud, J., and Monod, E. (2010). User experience of museum technologies: the phenomenological scales. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(5), 562-580. 
  8. Serravalle, F., Ferraris, A., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., and Christofi, M. (2019). Augmented reality in the tourism industry: A multi-stakeholder analysis of museums. Tourism Management Perspectives, 32, 100549. 
  9. Shehade, M., and Stylianou-Lambert, T. (2020). Virtual reality in museums: Exploring the experiences of museum professionals. Applied Sciences, 10(11), 4031. 
  10. Tim, Y., Pan, S. L., and Ouyang, T. (2018). Museum in the age of digital transformation. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 
  11. Sansom, A. (2019). Paris digital art venue Atelier des Lumieres is a hit, and expanding abroad. The Art Newspaper online. 
  12. Wang, A., Thompson, M., Uz-Bilgin, C., and Klopfer, E. (2021). Authenticity, interactivity, and collaboration in virtual reality games: Best practices and lessons learned. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 130. 
  13. Elgammal, I., Ferretti, M., Risitano, M., and Sorrentino, A. (2020). Does digital technology improve the visitor experience? A comparative study in the museum context. International Journal of Tourism Policy, 10(1), 47-67. 
  14. Zollo, L., Rialti, R., Marrucci, A., and Ciappei, C. (2022). How do museums foster loyalty in tech-savvy visitors? The role of social media and digital experience. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(18), 2991-3008. 
  15. Anderson, M. L. (1999). Museums of the future: The impact of technology on museum practices. Daedalus, 128(3), 129-162. 
  16. McPherson, G. (2006). Public memories and private tastes: The shifting definitions of museums and their visitors in the UK. Museum Management and Curatorship, 21(1), 44-57. 
  17. Rottenberg, B. L. (2002). Museums, information and the public sphere. Museum International, 54(4), 21-28. 
  18. Liu, X., and Zhang, N. (2022). Interactive display of images in digital exhibition halls under artificial intelligence and mixed reality technology. Computational Intelligence & Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3688797 
  19. Wu, Y., Jiang, Q., Ni, S., and Liang, H. e. (2021). Critical factors for predicting users' acceptance of digital museums for experience-influenced environments. Information, 12(10), 426. 
  20. Jung, T. H., and tom Dieck, M. C. (2017). Augmented reality, virtual reality and 3D printing for the co-creation of value for the visitor experience at cultural heritage places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 10(2), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-07-2016-0045 
  21. Lee, H., Jung, T. H., tom Dieck, M. C., and Chung, N. (2020). Experiencing immersive virtual reality in museums. Information & Management, 57(5), 103229. 
  22. Blumenthal, V. (2020). Consumer immersion in managed visitor attractions: The role of individual responses and antecedent factors. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 20(1), 4-27. 
  23. IBISWorld, I. (2019). IBISWorld-Industry Market Research, Reports, and Statistics. Retrieved from https://Clients1.ibisworld.com 
  24. Witmer, B. G., and Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240. 
  25. Agarwal, R., and Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. 
  26. Cho, N., Wang, Y., Lim, J. H., and Yu, G. (2022). The study of factors influencing the intention of continuous usage using augmented reality games: Comparative analysis of Korean and Chinese users. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 249-274. 
  27. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66-69. 
  28. Murray, J. H. (2017). Hamlet on the Holodeck, updated edition: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. MA: MIT Press. 
  29. Vi, C. T., Ablart, D., Gatti, E., Velasco, C., and Obrist, M. (2017). Not just seeing, but also feeling art: Mid-air haptic experiences integrated in a multisensory art exhibition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 108, 1-14. 
  30. He, Z., Wu, L., and Li, X. R. (2018). When art meets tech: The role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions. Tourism Management, 68, 127-139. 
  31. Holbrook, M. B., and Schindler, R. M. (1994). Age, sex, and attitude toward the past as predictors of consumers' aesthetic tastes for cultural products. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), 412-422. 
  32. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. 
  33. Bone, P. F., and Ellen, P. S. (1992). The generation and consequences of communication-evoked imagery. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 93-104. 
  34. Starr, G. G. (2013). Feeling beauty: The neuroscience of aesthetic experience, MIT Press. 
  35. Belfi, A. M., Vessel, E. A., and Starr, G. G. (2018). Individual ratings of vividness predict aesthetic appeal in poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 341. 
  36. Manthiou, A., Lee, S. A., Tang, L. R., and Chiang, L. (2014). The experience economy approach to festival marketing: Vivid memory and attendee loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-06- 2012-0105 
  37. Elmezeny, A., Edenhofer, N., and Wimmer, J. (2018). Immersive storytelling in 360-degree videos: An analysis of interplay between narrative and technical immersion. Journal For Virtual Worlds Research, 11(1), 1-13. 
  38. Ioannidis, Y., El Raheb, K., Toli, E., Katifori, A., Boile, M., and Mazura, M. (2013). One object many stories: Introducing ICT in museums and collections through digital storytelling. 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage), 421-424: IEEE. 
  39. Wyman, B., Smith, S., Meyers, D., and Godfrey, M. (2011). Digital storytelling in museums: observations and best practices. Curator: The Museum Journal, 54(4), 461-468. 
  40. Weng, V. M. (2014). From 'Stillness Becoming' to 'Making Time' digital surface within my new media-art practice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 82-91. 
  41. Cubitt, S. (2002). Visual and audiovisual: From image to moving image. Journal of Visual Culture, 1(3), 359-368. 
  42. Boris, V. (2017). What makes storytelling so effective for learning. Leading the way: Ideas and insights from Harvard Business Publishing Corporate Learning (Blog). 
  43. Pressgrove, G., and Bowman, N. D. (2021). From immersion to intention? Exploring advances in prosocial storytelling. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 26(2), e1689. 
  44. He, A. Z., Cai, Y., Cai, L., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Conversation, storytelling, or consumer interaction and participation? The impact of brand-owned social media content marketing on consumers' brand perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 419-440. 
  45. Ernst, M. O., and Bulthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 162-169. 
  46. Covaci, A., Ghinea, G., Lin, C. H., Huang, S. H., and Shih, J. L. (2018). Multisensory games-based learning-lessons learnt from olfactory enhancement of a digital board game. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(16), 21245-21263. 
  47. Terrenghi, L., and Zimmermann, A. (2004). Tailored audio augmented environments for museums. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 334-336. 
  48. Klein, B., and Leffler, K. B. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615-641. 
  49. Clarkson, J. J., Janiszewski, C., and Cinelli, M. D. (2013). The desire for consumption knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1313-1329. 
  50. TM, A., Singh, S., Khan, S. J., Ul Akram, M., and Chauhan, C. (2021). Just one more episode: Exploring consumer motivations for adoption of streaming services. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 3(1), 17-42. 
  51. Nicolao, L., Irwin, J. R., and Goodman, J. K. (2009). Happiness for sale: Do experiential purchases make consumers happier than material purchases? Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 188-198. 
  52. Mackiewicz, L., and Melendez, F. (2016). Loving vincent: Guiding painters through 64.000 frames. ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Talks, 1-2. 
  53. Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., and Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment☆. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39-56. 
  54. Baker, D. A., and Crompton, J. L. (2000). Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 785-804. 
  55. Dwivedi, A., Nayeem, T., and Murshed, F. (2018). Brand experience and consumers' willingness-to-pay (WTP) a price premium: Mediating role of brand credibility and perceived uniqueness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 100-107. 
  56. Yi, C., Jiang, Z., and Benbasat, I. (2017). Designing for diagnosticity and serendipity: An investigation of social product-search mechanisms. Information Systems Research, 28(2), 413-429. 
  57. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Uppersaddle River. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed) Upper Saddle River, 5(3), 207-219. 
  58. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption ans use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, 2. 
  59. Bell, A., Ensslin, A., Van Der Bom, I., and Smith, J. (2018). Immersion in digital fiction. International Journal of Literary Linguistics, 7(1). 
  60. Mathias, N. (2022). Meta-artistic immersion in digital exhibitions. History-mobilization-spectatorship. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 14(1), 2129160. 
  61. Zhou, Y., Chen, J., and Wang, M. (2022). A meta-analytic review on incorporating virtual and augmented reality in museum learning. Educational Research Review, 36, 100454. 
  62. Lupascu, A. G., Ciupe, A., Meza, S., and Orza, B. (2021). ARThings-enhancing the visitors' experience in museums through collaborative AR. 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW), 669-670. IEEE. 
  63. Cardenas Gasca, A. M., Jacobs, J. M., Monroy-Hernandez, A., and Nebeling, M. (2022). AR exhibitions for sensitive narratives: Designing an immersive exhibition for the museum of memory in Colombia. Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 1698-1714. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533549 
  64. Carter, R. W., and Sanford, J. C. (2012). A new look at an old virus: patterns of mutation accumulation in the human H1N1 influenza virus since 1918. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 9(1), 1-19.