DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Future hydrological changes in Jeju Island based on CMIP6 climate change scenarios

CMIP6 기후변화 시나리오에 따른 제주도 지역의 미래 수문변화 전망

  • Kim, Chul-Gyum (Department of Hydro Science and Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Cho, Jaepil (Integrated Watershed Management Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Eun (Department of Hydro Science and Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Chang, Sunwoo (Department of Hydro Science and Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
  • 김철겸 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원하천연구본부) ;
  • 조재필 (유역통합관리연구원 유역관리융합연구소) ;
  • 이정은 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원하천연구본부) ;
  • 장선우 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원하천연구본부)
  • Received : 2023.09.18
  • Accepted : 2023.10.23
  • Published : 2023.11.30

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the hydrological impacts of future climate change on Jeju Island using SSP-based climate change scenarios from 18 climate models and watershed modeling (SWAT-K). Despite discrepancies among climate models, we generally observed an increase in evapotranspiration due to rising future temperatures. Furthermore, a significant increase in runoff and recharge was noted due to increased precipitation. These increasing trends were particularly pronounced in the SSP5-8.5 scenario, and differences among GCM models became more significant in the late 21 century. When compared to the historical period (1981-2010), the projected changes for the far-future period (2071-2100) in the SSP5-8.5 scenario showed a 21.4% increase in precipitation, a 19.2% increase in evapotranspiration, a 40.9% increase in runoff, and a 16.6% increase in recharge on an annual average basis. On a monthly basis in the SSP5-8.5 scenario, precipitation was expected to increase by 24.5% in September, evapotranspiration by 34.1% in April, runoff by 58.1% in October, and recharge by 33.8% in September. To further assess projections based on extreme climate scenarios, we selected two models, CanESM5 and ACCESS-ESM1-5, which represented the maximum and minimum future precipitation forecasts, and compared the hydrological changes in the future scenarios. The results indicated that runoff and recharge rates were relatively higher in the CanESM5 model with the highest precipitation forecast, while evapotranspiration rates were higher in the ACCESS-ESM1-5 model with the lowest precipitation forecast. Based on the climate change scenarios used in this study, the overall available water resources on Jeju Island are more likely to increase. However, since results vary by season and region depending on the climate model and scenario, it is considered necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis and develop response measures using various scenarios.

본 연구에서는 18개 기후모형으로부터 도출된 SSP 기반의 미래 기후변화 시나리오와 유역모델링(SWAT-K)을 연계하여 제주도 지역의 미래 기후변화에 따른 수문학적 영향을 분석하였다. 기후모형에 따른 편차가 있으나 대체로 미래 기온의 증가에 따라 증발산량이 증가하고, 강수량의 증가로 인해 유출량과 함양량 또한 크게 증가할 것으로 전망되었다. 특히 SSP5-8.5 시나리오에서 이러한 증가가 더욱 뚜렷하게 나타났으며, 미래 후반기로 갈수록 GCM 모형 간의 차이가 크게 나타났다. 연평균 값에 대한 과거기간(1981~2010년) 대비 증감률로는 미래 후반기(2071~2100년)에 SSP5-8.5 시나리오에서 강수량 +21.4%, 증발산량 +19.2%, 유출량 +40.9%, 함양량 +16.6%의 전망을 나타내었다. 월별로 변화율을 보면 SSP5-8.5 시나리오에서 강수량은 9월에 24.5%, 증발산량은 4월에 34.1%, 유출량은 10월에 58.1%, 함양량은 9월에 33.8%까지 증가할 것으로 전망되었다. 또한 극한 기후 시나리오에 따른 전망을 위해, 미래에 최다 강수량을 예측한 CanESM5 모형과 최소 강수량을 예측한 ACCESS-ESM1-5 모형의 미래 기후자료를 사용하여 연평균 수문학적 변화를 비교하였다. 그 결과 강수량이 최대로 나타난 CanESM5 모형에서는 유출률과 함양률이 상대적으로 높게 나타난 반면, 강수량이 최저로 전망된 ACCESS-ESM1-5의 경우에는 증발산 비율이 높게 나타났다. 본 연구에서 적용한 기후변화 시나리오 기준으로 제주도 전체의 가용수자원은 증가한다고 전망할 수 있으나, 기후모형에 따라 계절별 지역별로 상이한 결과를 도출할 수 있기 때문에 가능한 다양한 시나리오를 활용한 종합적 분석과 대응방안이 필요하다고 생각된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한국건설기술연구원 주요사업 "신기준수위 기반 해안지역 지하수 관리 솔루션 개발" 과제의 연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Ahn, S.R., Park, M.J., Park, G.A, and Kim, S.J. (2009). "Assessing future climate change impact on hydrologic components of Gyeongancheon watershed." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 33-50.  https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.1.33
  2. Arnold, J.G., Allen, P.M., and Bernhardt, G. (1993). "A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 142, pp. 47-69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S
  3. Cho, J., Jung, I., Cho, W., Lee, E.-J., Kang, D., and Lee, J. (2018). "Suggestion of user-centered climate service framework and development of user interface platform for climate change adaptation." Journal of Climate Change Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-12. 
  4. Cho, J.-P., Kim, J.-U., Choi, S.-K., Hwang, S.-W., and Jung, H.-C. (2020). "Variability analysis of climate extreme index using downscaled multi-models and grid-based CMIP5 climate change scenario data." Journal of Climate Change Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 123-132.  https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2020.11.2.123
  5. Chung, I.M., Lee, J., Kim, J.T., Na, H., and Kim, N.W. (2011). "Development of threshold runoff simulation method for runoff analysis of Jeju Island." Journal of the Environmental Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 10, pp. 1347-1355.  https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2011.20.10.1347
  6. Han, W.-K. and Yang, S.-K. (2009). "A runoff simulation using SWAT model depending on changes to land use in Jeju Island." Journal of the Environmental Sciences, Vol.. 18, No. 9, pp. 1057-1063.  https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2009.18.9.1057
  7. Jeju Province and Korea Water Resources Corporation (KOWACO) (2003). Comprehensive investigation of hydrology and groundwater resources in Jeju Island (III). 
  8. Jeju Regional Office of Meteorology (Jeju KMA) (2019). Analysis of climate change characteristics in Jeju Island.
  9. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (JSSGP) (2013). The water management comprehensive plan for Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (2013-2022). 
  10. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (JSSGP) (2018). The water management comprehensive plan for Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (Supplement) (2018-2022). 
  11. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (JSSGP) (2022). Jeju Special Self-Governing Province integrated water management master plan (2023-2032). 
  12. Jung, W.-Y., and Yang, S.-K. (2008). "Application of SWAT model on rivers in Jeju Island." Journal of the Environmental Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 1039-1052.  https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2008.17.9.1039
  13. Kang, J.-Y., Jung, H.-C., and Kim, B.-S. (2014). An evaluation of vulnerability of Jeju Island following the RCP 8.5 climate change scenario. Basic Research 2014-14, Jeju Development Institute. 
  14. Kay, A.L., Davies, H.N., Bell, V.A., and Jones, R.G. (2009). "Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: Flood frequency in England." Climatic Change, Vol. 92, No. 1-2, pp. 41-63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9471-4
  15. Kim, C.G., and Kim, N.W. (2016). "Evaluation and complementation of observed flow in the Hancheon watershed in Jeju Island using a physically-based watershed model." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 49, No. 11, pp. 951-959. 
  16. Kim, C.-G., Cho, J., and Kim, H. (2020). "Assessment of climate change impacts on water resources in the Gyeongan-cheon watershed using multiple GCMs." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 119-126. 
  17. Kim, C.G., Cho, J., and Kim, N.W. (2018). "Assessing hydrologic impact of climate change in Jeju Isalnd using multiple GCMs and watershed modeling." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 11-18. 
  18. Kim, D.-H., Jang, T., Hwang, S., and Cho, J. (2019a). "Assessing hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Mankyung watershed with different GCM spatial downscaling methods." Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 81-92.  https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2019.61.6.081
  19. Kim, G.-B., Hwang, C.-I., Shin, H.-J., and Choi, M.-R. (2019b). "Application of groundwater recharge rate estimation method based on artificial neural networks in unmeasured areas." Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 693-701.  https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.6.693
  20. Kim, J.-H., and Yun, J.I. (2016). "The use and abuse of climate scenarios in agriculture." Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 170-178.  https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2016.18.3.170
  21. Kim, J.H., and Yun, S.-J. (2020). "Limiting factors in establishing and implementing climate change adaptation plans of Jeju province." The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 225-251.  https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.24.3.11
  22. Kim, N.W., Chung, I.M., and Na, H. (2013). "A method of simulating ephemeral stream runoff characteristics in cheonmicheon watershed, Jeju Island." Journal of Environmental Science International, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 523-531.  https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2013.22.5.523
  23. Koh, G.W., Park, W.B., and Moon, S.H. (2014). "The direction of managing the water resources of Jeju Island in response to climate change." Jeju Development Research, Vol. 12, pp. 27-55. 
  24. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (KICT) (2007). Development of analysing system for sustainable water hydrological components. Sustainable Water Resources Research Program of 21st Century Frontier R&D Program, Ministry of Science and Technology. 
  25. Korea Water Resources Corporation (KOWACO) (1993). Establishment of comprehensive development plan for water resources in Jeju Province. 
  26. Lee. J.-H., Yang, S.-K., and Kim, M.-C. (2015). "Runoff analysis of climate change scenario in Gangjung basin." Journal of Environmental Science International, Vol. 24, No. 12, pp. 1649-1656.  https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2015.24.12.1649
  27. Lee, J.H., Yang, S.K., Yang, W.S., and Lee, G.B. (2016). "Runoff analysis of climate change scenario in Gangjung basin." In Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference, pp. 539-543. 
  28. Lee, J.K. (2014). Scenario selection and uncertainty quantification for climate change impact assessments in water resource. Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University. 
  29. Lee, M.J., Lee, J.H., Jeon, S.W., and Houng, H.J. (2010). "Review of policy direction and coupled model development between groundwater recharge quantity and climate change." Journal of Environmental Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 157-184.  https://doi.org/10.17330/joep.9.2.201006.157
  30. Lim Kam Sian, K.T.C., Wang, J., Ayugi, B.O, Nooni, J.K, and Ongoma, V. (2021). "Multi-decadal variability and future changes in precipitation over Southern Africa." Atmosphere, Vol. 12, 742. doi: 10.3390/atmos12060742. 
  31. National Institute of Meteorological Sciences (NIMS) (2018). Climate change over 100 years in the Korean Peninsula. 
  32. National Institute of Meteorological Sciences (NIMS) (2020a). Global climate change outlook report in response to the IPCC sixth assessment report (Revised edition). 
  33. National Institute of Meteorological Sciences (NIMS) (2020b). Korean Peninsula outlook report 2020: Climate projections according to SSP1-2.6/SSP5-8.5. 
  34. Park, J.-C., Choi, K.-J., and Song, S.-H. (2014). "Prediction of regional drought considering aspect and elevation in Jeju Island under future climate change." Journal of Environmental Science International, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 649-660.  https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2014.4.649
  35. Rural Development Administration (RDA) (2021). Technical guide for the production of downscaled SSP climate change scenario data for agricultural applications. National Institute of Agricultural Sciences. 
  36. Shin, E., Koh, E.-H., Ha, K., Lee, E., and Lee, K.-K. (2016). "Impact of climate change on the groundwater recharge and groudwater level variations in Pyoseon watershed of Jeju Island, Korea." Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 22-35.  https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2016.21.6.022
  37. Song, S.-H., Lee, G.-S., Myoung, W.-H., An, J.-G., Baek, J.-H., and Jung, C.-Y. (2019). "Estimation of regional future agricultural available groundwater supply in Jeju Island using water balance method." Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 23-37.  https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2019.24.2.023
  38. Wilby, R.L., and Harris, I. (2006). "A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK." Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, No. 2, W02419, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004065.