Korea Trade Review (무역학회지)

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exchange Rate Volatility and Bilateral Trade Flow: Evidence from China

환율 변동성과 양자 무역 흐름: 중국을 중심으로

  • 이청 (경희대학교 무역학과) ;
  • 이상휘 (경희대학교 무역학과 )
  • Received : 2023.07.25
  • Accepted : 2023.08.15
  • Published : 2023.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Our study aims to explore the impact of China's foreign trade policy measures on the real exchange rate movement. We seek to provide specific references for the formulation of exchange rate and trade-related strategies. Our results indicate that China's bilateral trade is significantly influenced by movements in the Real Effective Exchange Rate (RER). When analyzing the relationship between aggregated trade flow and exchange rate movements, this paper finds that the depreciation of the real exchange rate leads to an increase in China's export volume and a slight decrease in its import volume. Moreover, China's export volume exhibits higher sensitivity to exchange rate volatility compared to the exchange rate level. Furthermore, the empirical findings regarding disaggregated trade flow suggest that different goods are affected differently by exchange rate movements. Capital goods and consumer goods, being in different stages of processing, show no negative impact on their import and export due to exchange rate depreciation. Consequently, we recommend deepening the industry's reform by improving production efficiency and transitioning the industrial structure to a higher processing stage. This approach can effectively reduce the negative impact of exchange rate depreciation.

본 연구는 중국의 대외무역정책 조치가 중국에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고자 하며 중국의 양자 무역이 실질실효환율의 움직임에 크게 영향을 받는다는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 총무역흐름과 환율변동의 관계를 분석한 결과 실질환율의 하락이 중국의 수출량을 증가시키고 수입량을 소폭 감소시키는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 중국의 수출량은 환율수준에 비해 환율변동성에 대한 민감도가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 나아가 세분화된 무역흐름에 대한 실증결과는 상품마다 환율변동에 따라 상이한 영향을 받고 있음을 시사하고 있다. 자본재와 소비재는 서로 다른 가공 단계에 있으므로 환율 하락으로 인해 수출입에 부정적인 영향을 미치지 않은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aftab, M., Ahmad, R., Ismail, I., and Ahmed, M.(2016). "Does exchange-rate uncertainty matter in the Malaysia-EU bilateral trade? An industry level investigation," Empirica, Vol.43 No.1, pp. 461-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9302-6
  2. Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2003). "Gravity With Gravitas: a Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review Vol.93 No.1, pp. 170-192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
  3. Arize, A. C., Osang, T., & Slottje, D. J. (2000). "Exchange-rate volatility and foreign trade: evidence from thirteen LDC's," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol.18 No.1, pp. 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2000.10524843
  4. Aziz, N. (2008). "The role of exchange rate in trade balance: Empirics from Bangladesh," University of Birmingham, UK, pp. 1-25.
  5. Bacchetta, P., & Van Wincoop, E. (2003). "Why do consumer prices react less than import prices to exchange rates?" Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol.1 No.2-3, pp. 662-670.
  6. Baek, J. (2012). "Exchange rate sensitivity of Korea-US bilateral trade: Evidence from industrial trade data," Journal of Korea Trade, Vol.16 No.3, pp. 1-21.
  7. Baek, J. (2014). "Exchange rate effects on Korea-US bilateral trade: A new look," Research in Economics, Vol.68 No.3, pp. 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2014.05.002
  8. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Harvey, H. (2014). "US-Indonesia trade at commodity level and the role of the exchange rate," Applied Economics, Vol.46 No.18, pp. 2154-2166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.896985
  9. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Karamelikli, H. (2019). "Exchange rate volatility and Japan-US commodity trade: An asymmetry analysis," The World Economy, Vol.42 No.11, pp. 3287-3318. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12856
  10. Blaum, J. (2017). "Importing, Exporting and Aggregate Productivity in Large Devaluations," Unpublished Manuscript, Brown University.
  11. Caglayan, M., & Demir, F. (2019). "Exchange rate movements, export sophistication and direction of trade: the development channel and North- South trade flows," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.43 No.6, pp. 1623-1652. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez005
  12. Caglayan, M., & Di, J. (2010). "Does real exchange rate volatility affect sectoral trade flows?" Southern Economic Journal, Vol.77 No.2, pp. 313-335. https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2010.77.2.313
  13. Chit, M. M., Rizov, M., & Willenbockel, D. (2010). "Exchange rate volatility and exports: New empirical evidence from the emerging East Asian economies," World Economy, Vol.33 No.2, pp. 239-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01230.x
  14. Cimoli M., Fleitas S., Porcile G. (2011), "Real Exchange Rate and the Structure of Exports," MPRA Paper No. 37846, pp. 1-24
  15. Halicioglu, F. (2008). "The bilateral J-curve: Turkey versus her 13 trading partners," Journal of Asian Economics, Vol.19 No.3, pp. 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2008.02.006
  16. Huchet-Bourdon, M., & Korinek, J. (2011). "To what extent do exchange rates and their volatility affect trade."
  17. Irandoust, M., Ekblad, K., & Parmler, J. (2006). "Bilateral trade flows and exchange rate sensitivity: Evidence from likelihood-based panel cointegration," Economic Systems, Vol.30 No.2, pp. 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2005.12.001
  18. Martinez-Zarzoso, I., & Nowak-Lehmann, F. (2003). "Augmented Gravity Model: An Empirical Application to Mercosur-European Union trade flows," Journal of Applied Economics, Vol.6 No.2, pp. 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2003.12040596
  19. Moslares, C., & Ekanayake, E. M. (2018). "The effect of real exchange rate volatility on exports in the baltic region," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, Vol.12 No.1, pp. 23-38.
  20. Qiu, B., Das, K. K., & Reed, W. R. (2019). "The Effect of Exchange Rates on Chinese Trade: A Dual Margin Approach," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, pp. 1-23.
  21. Romelli, D., Terra, C., & Vasconcelos, E. (2018). "Current account and real exchange rate changes: The impact of trade openness," European Economic Review, Vol.105, pp. 135-158.
  22. Ros, J. (2013). "Latin America's trade and growth patterns, the China factor, and Prebisch's nightmare," Journal of Globalization and Development, Vol.3 No.2, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2012-0031
  23. Sauer, C., & Bohara, A. K. (2001). "Exchange rate volatility and exports: regional differences between developing and industrialized countries," Review of International Economics, Vol.9 No.1, pp. 133-152.
  24. Serenis, D. (2013). Does exchange rate volatility hinder export flows for South American countries?. Applied Economics Letters, 20(5), 436-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.709593
  25. Silva, J. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). "The log of gravity," The Review of Economics and statistics, Vol.88 No.4, pp. 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641
  26. Soleymani, A., & Chua, S. Y. (2014). "How responsive are trade flows between Malaysia and China to the exchange rate? Evidence from industry data," International Review of Applied Economics, Vol.28 No.2, pp. 191-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2013.858666
  27. Truong, H. Q., Dong, C. V., & Nguyen, H. H. (2019). "Determinants of trade flows and trade structure between Korea and ASEAN," East Asian Economic Review, Vol.23 No.1, pp. 55-88. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2019.23.1.356
  28. Zhang, Z., and Sato, K. (2012). "Should Chinese Renminbi be blamed for its trade surplus? A structural VAR approach", The World Economy, Vol.35 No.5, pp. 632-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01438.x