DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Trend Mapping: A Bibliometric Analysis of Management Accounting and Distribution

  • Elsie NGA (Faculty of Business and Communications, Inti International University) ;
  • Affiza Mohamad TALLAHA (Faculty of Business and Communications, Inti International University) ;
  • Ridzwana Mohd SAID (School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Ching Wen KOK (Faculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, Inti International University)
  • Received : 2023.02.21
  • Accepted : 2023.11.05
  • Published : 2023.11.30

Abstract

Purpose: Management accounting knowledge has been researched and disseminated through various channels, particularly academic journals. This paper examines the journals that publish research on management accounting. Research design, data, and methodology: The bibliometric method was applied using Scopus citation data. The limits of management accounting are quantitatively investigated by analysing 1,554 articles from 2016 to 2022 from each database. Results: The findings indicate a rapid increase in management accounting publications in recent years, with the highest number of articles published in 2021. The articles appeared in various scholarly journals, including those devoted to psychology, agriculture and biological sciences, and computer science. Keyword analysis reveals that management accounting is the most commonly used term in the field. In addition, the findings indicate that most scholarly authors are from Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Conclusion: This paper contributes to the current body of knowledge in management accounting research by providing an overview of the mapping of management accounting research in the world of research publications and potential future management accounting research from the lens of costs, expenses and competitive prices, which can benefit marketing and distribution efforts.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Management accounting research has grown steadily over the past four decades and has evolved from cost and control-related research to encompass performance measurement and evaluation-related topics.

In particular, the emergence of hierarchical organisations as a result of the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century necessitated the development of techniques for measuring conversion costs using management accounting.

The process generated summary measures, including cost per hour or pound produced for each process and employee (Johnson & Kaplan, 1987). The research scope has shifted from cost estimation to customer value creation (Ahmed Mohamed Ghandour, 2021). The dynamic growth of organisations adopting management accounting practices is crucial for addressing the overwhelming challenges and competition in the business environment. Beyond numbers, management accounting research is also concerned with how people make decisions (Shields, 2018).

Management accounting is defined as "processes and techniques that focus on the effective and efficient use of organisational resources to assist managers in their tasks of increasing both customer and shareholder value" (adapted from the International Federation of Accountants, 2002, cited in Langfield-Smith et al. (2019). The definition emphasises the significance of management accounting information and the use of sophisticated information systems for decision-making by managers of various divisions within an organisation.

Managers use various management accounting techniques to make decisions regarding a business's day-to-day operations and future planning. Innovators of management accounting techniques face numerous obstacles when developing viable and effective methods.

Effective cost management using management accounting practices can give businesses a competitive advantage by enabling them to offer their products at competitive prices. It is a crucial aspect of business operations as it directly impacts the business's financial performance (Malmi & Brown, 2008). Management accounting practices enhance management’s understanding of the costs and identify areas to reduce expenses without compromising product or service quality.

For example, managers can use cost accounting techniques to analyse production processes, identify inefficiencies, and optimise them to reduce costs (Shank et al., 1993). This has also garnered the interest of management accounting researchers who have spent decades studying management accounting and control practices globally.

Additionally, businesses can implement effective cost-management practices to offer competitive prices and improve marketing and distribution efforts. Competitive pricing can help businesses attract price-sensitive customers looking for value for money.

It can also help businesses retain existing customers by providing the best possible product price. (Kim et al., 2004)

Furthermore, effective cost management can enable businesses to invest in other supply chain aspects, such as marketing and distribution. Businesses can reduce costs to free up resources that can be invested in marketing campaigns or distribution channels that can help them reach their target markets more effectively. (Datar & Rajan, 2018)

Accordingly, businesses that effectively manage their costs using management accounting practices can improve overall financial performance and achieve sustainable growth (Hilton et al., 2006; Anthony et al., 2012; Cokins, 2009).

As a sub-discipline of accounting's broad body of knowledge (Merigo & Yang, 2017), management accounting has been studied and disseminated through various channels, particularly academic journals. Moreover, management accounting research articles are published in journals from various disciplines, including the social and natural sciences. Thus, it is intriguing to examine how management accounting is mapped in the world of academic publications.

This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of management accounting research published in journals indexed by Scopus. It provides an overview of the most significant research findings and trends in management accounting. This study describes the characteristics of the management accounting literature, including the number of articles and citations, research subject categories, highly cited articles, active authors, and institutions. Nonetheless, this study aims to suggest future research directions concerning management accounting and control. This study contributes to the current body of knowledge because it provides potential insights into the evolution of management accounting research publications over the past six years. In addition, it offers management accounting scholars a foundational understanding of this research profile.

To fulfil the aforementioned research goals, this paper is organised as follows: This section describes the context and justification for conducting the bibliometric analysis. The second section provides an overview of research and bibliometric analysis in management accounting. The third section describes the study methodology. The penultimate section discusses the study findings. The conclusion and limitations of the analysis are presented in the final section.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Management Accounting

The CIMA defines management accounting as "the process of identifying, measuring, accumulating, analysing, preparing, interpreting, and communicating information used by management to plan, evaluate, and control an entity and ensure the appropriate use of its resources". Academics have shown increased interest in management accounting over the past two decades. Due to the unpredictability of the business environment and the rapid evolution of technology, management accounting practices must adapt to the changes that have influenced their evolution and the expansion of management accounting research. The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) framework describes the four stages of management accounting development: cost determination and financial control (stage 1), information generation for planning and control (stage 2), cost reduction (stage 3) and value creation (stage 4). Since the early 1980s, management accounting research has expanded due to the emergence of new research topics (Kaplan, 1993; Young & Selto, 1991), the introduction of new journals devoted solely to publishing management accounting research, and the calls to examine management accounting phenomena from multidisciplinary perspectives (Baiman, 1990; Covaleski et al., 1996; Macintosh & Scapens, 1990). Although previous studies provide evidence of the trend and development of management accounting research, studies such as Nain et al. (2022) are restricted to quantitative management accounting research utilising a summary graphic of presentation (maps). Consequently, a bibliometric analysis of management accounting research can enhance the information provided by domain-specific articles.

2.2. Bibliometric Analysis

There are numerous definitions of bibliometrics. Ye et al. (2012) assert that bibliometrics investigates research outcomes, such as topics, methodologies, and samples. Zupic and Cater (2015) define bibliometrics as a method for analysing disciplines' intellectual, social, and conceptual evolution. According to Merigó and Yang (2017), bibliometric analysis quantitatively studies and categorises bibliographic content. In a nutshell, bibliometric analysis analyses books, articles, and other publications using statistical methods. It uses quantitative techniques such as content analysis, citation, and co-citation analysis to cluster and map particular scientific publications (Renaud & Maucuer, 2018).

Scholars use bibliometric analysis for various purposes, such as discovering emerging trends in article and journal performance, collaboration patterns, and research constituents, and investigating the intellectual structure of a specific domain in the existing literature (Donthu et al., 2021a, 2021b; Verma & Gustafsson, 2020). Bibliometric analysis typically uses massive (hundreds or thousands) objective data points (e.g., the number of citations and publications, occurrences of keywords and topics), but its interpretations frequently rely on objective (e.g., performance analysis) and subjective (e.g., thematic analysis) evaluations established through informed techniques and procedures. In other words, bibliometric analysis helps decipher and map the accumulated scientific knowledge and evolutionary nuances of well-established fields by systematically condensing useful information from large volumes of unstructured data.

Therefore, well-executed bibliometric studies can provide the groundwork for advancing a field in novel and significant ways. For instance, it enables and empowers scholars to (1) obtain a comprehensive overview, (2) identify knowledge gaps, (3) generate novel research ideas, and (4) position their intended contributions to the research area (Donthu et al., 2021a).

3. Methodology

This research uses the Scopus database to collect data, which aligns with previous bibliometric studies such as Nain et al. (2022). Scopus is the largest multidisciplinary database of peer-reviewed literature in social science research, and it provides a variety of data formats compatible with bibliometric software for further processing.

The database provides publication-specific details, such as access type, year, author name, subject area, text type, source title, keyword, affiliation, country, source type, and language (Nain et al., 2022). The keyword management accounting appears in the abstract, the title, and the list of keywords. The evaluation period was set as articles published between 2016 and July 1, 2021. As a result, 1,706 articles were gathered. They were filtered based on the two dominant subject areas of management accounting and English, leaving 1,554 articles as the final sample. The final set consists of empirical and theoretical research on conceptual discussions. The sample was analysed using Microsoft® Excel, Harzing® Publish or Perish, and VOSviewer software.

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1: Diagram of the research flow.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Subject Area

There are a variety of research fields in management accounting, and numerous research groups around the world are involved in various areas. The subject area analysis demonstrated that Management Accounting studies primarily concern business, management, and accounting (1,090 articles). Other subject areas consist of economics, econometrics, and finance (539 articles), social sciences (294 articles), decision sciences (214 articles), and computer science (204 articles). Nonetheless, management accounting is a multidisciplinary field having arts and humanities (24 articles) as a subfield.

Table 1: Subject Area

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_t0001.png 이미지

4.2. Year of Publication

Table 4.8 and Figure 2 shows that the publication years of the collected articles on management accounting ranged from 2016 to 2022. At 296, 2021 had the maximum number of publications, followed by 274 in 2020. The remaining years have fewer than 250 publications. Even though most countries worldwide were on lockdown in 2020 and 2021, most articles were published during these two years. It could be attributed to increased research opportunities and concentration during the lockdown period. The global lockdown likely reduced collaboration, leading to research conducted by many individual contributors.

Table 2: Year of Publication

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_t0008.png 이미지

Notes: TP=total number of publications; NCP=number of cited publications; TC=total citations; C/P=average citations per publication; C/CP=average citations per cited publication; h=h-index; and g=g-index

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2: Publication trends.

4.3. The 10 Most Active Journals

This study also analysed the most active management accounting publications in journals. The findings revealed that four publishers control the ten most popular journals (Table 3). Emerald Group Publishing has published the top two most active journals. The Journal of Accounting and Organisational Change (48) had the most articles, followed by the Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal (38), The Journal of Management Accounting Research (35), Management Accounting Research (34), and Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management (34).

Table 3: The 10 Most Active Journals

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_t0002.png 이미지

Note: *Cite score, SJR, SNI is up until 2021.

According to the 2021 CiteScore report, three journals had a CiteScore of 5 or higher. Even though the Journal of Cleaner Production is ranked ninth in Scopus with 23 papers, its Cite Score of 15.8 is significantly higher than the other journals. The study acknowledged that the selection process of CiteScore in matching authors' most innovative and influential work would influence the choice of journal for publication by some authors. CiteScore, the Elsevier-Scopus alternative to the Clarivate Analytics Impact Factor, is a journal evaluation metric based on Scopus database citation results. However, the researchers disagree that CiteScore should be the only metric. In addition to CiteScore, authors should consider whether the journal can reach the intended audience and contribute to advancing the field.

4.4. The 15 Most Active Authors

The 15 most prominent authors in Management Accounting Research are listed in Table 4. Australia, the United Kingdom, and Germany had three authors each, followed by two authors from Indonesia and one each from Finland, the United States, Italy, and Malaysia.

Table 4: The 15 Most Active Authors

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_t0003.png 이미지

Notes: TP=total number of publications; NCP=number of cited publications; TC=total citations; C/P=average citations per publication; C/CP=average citations per cited publication; h=h-index; and g=g-index

From 2016 to 2022, Schaltegger authored a record number of 15 articles, achieved an h-index of 7, and received 377 citations. The authors in second and third place, Quinn and Hiebl, are affiliated with the Queen's Management School and the University of Siegen, respectively. It is interesting to note that although Quinn is listed as the second most active author, he has only 51 citations. Schaltegger's research primarily focuses on corporate sustainability, whereas Hiebl's research focuses on management accounting and control, strategic management, risk management, and small and family-owned businesses.

4.5. The Most Active Institutions

As shown in Table 5, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia, with 22 publications, is the most active institution among those with 15 or more publications in management accounting. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia, is second with 18 publications during the studied years. In comparison, The Leuphana University in Germany, The Tampere University in Finland, and The Prague University of Economics and Business in the Czech Republic produced 16 to 17 publications.

Table 5: The Most Active Institutions with 15 or More Publications.

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_t0004.png 이미지

4.6. Authorship and Citation Analysis

Table 6 shows the 20 most-cited articles on management accounting from the 1,554 papers collected for this study. The most cited article received 233 citations, while the least cited article received 56 citations. Eight of these 20 articles were published in 2016, with another eight published in 2017, representing the highest number of publications in any year during this study’s timeline.

Table 6: The 20 Most Cited Articles

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_t0005.png 이미지

An article on Contingency Theory received the most citations. This theory is one of the foundational theories in management accounting research. The top two papers are concept papers discussing related theories and methodologies. Papers relating to the Digital Era, which is defined by technology that increases the speed and breadth of knowledge turnover within the economy and society, are also among the most cited. In 2016 and 2017, researchers identified studies on management accounting and its relationship with digitalisation, big data, business intelligence & analytics, sustainability, and climate change.

4.7. Keywords Analysis

The keyword co-occurrence analysis is commonly used in bibliometric studies (Grueso-Gala & Zornoza, 2022). Table 7 shows the most frequently used keywords in management accounting research, including management accounting (494 publications), information management (87 publications), environmental management accounting (84 publications), and environmental management (70 publications). The authors' keywords were also mapped using the VOS viewer, a software tool for creating and visualising bibliometric networks. Figure 3 reflects these findings. It displays a network visualisation of the authors' keywords, with larger fonts indicating the words used most frequently in previous studies.

Table 7: The 20 Most Used Keywords

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_t0006.png 이미지

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3: Network visualisation map of keywords most frequently used by authors.

Meanwhile, the lines represent the connections between different keywords. It is interesting to see the emergence of the environmental element in management accounting research, given that the 2030 Agenda concerning sustainable development outlined by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) is currently a hot topic being researched and discussed by many authors.

Based on keyword co-occurrence in the Figure 3 VOSviewer map file, the following clusters can be identified:

Cluster 1: Management Accounting, Strategic Management Accounting, and Management Accounting Systems and Management Accounting Practices. This cluster represents the core focus of the analysis, with management accounting being the most frequently occurring keyword. The other keywords in this cluster represent different aspects of management accounting, such as strategic management and accounting practices.

Cluster 2: Environmental Management Accounting, Environmental Management, Sustainable Development, Sustainability and Environmental Performance. This cluster represents the environmental aspect of management accounting, focusing on sustainable development and environmental performance. Environmental Management Accounting is the most frequently occurring keyword in this cluster, indicating that it is a significant concern in management accounting research.

Cluster 3: Information Management and Information Systems. This cluster represents the role of information management and information systems in management accounting. Information management is the most frequently occurring keyword in this cluster, indicating that it is a crucial aspect of management accounting research.

Cluster 4: Accounting, Cost Accounting, Financial Accounting and Costs. This cluster represents the basic accounting principles, focusing on cost and financial accounting. Accounting is the most frequently occurring keyword in this cluster, indicating that it is a fundamental aspect of management accounting research.

Cluster 5: Decision Making. This cluster represents the decision-making aspect of Management Accounting. Decision-making is the most frequently occurring keyword in this cluster, indicating that it is an essential concern in management accounting research.

Cluster 6: Big Data. This cluster represents the growing interest in using big data in management accounting research. Big data is the most frequently occurring keyword in this cluster, showing that it is an emerging area of research.

Cluster 7: Finance, Economics and Management. This cluster represents the broader context of management accounting, focusing on finance, economics, and management. Finance is the most frequently occurring keyword in this cluster, indicating that it is a crucial aspect of management accounting research.

Overall, the VOS viewer map file suggests that management accounting research covers various topics, including environmental management, information management, decision-making, and big data. The most frequently occurring keywords in each cluster reflect the researchers’ primary concerns in each area.

Based on the identified clusters and corresponding keywords, the following potential future research directions are suggested:

1. Management Accounting and Sustainability: Cluster analysis indicates a growing interest in integrating sustainability into management accounting practices. Future research could focus on exploring the impact of environmental management accounting on sustainability performance, the role of management accounting systems in promoting sustainability, and adopting sustainable development practices in management accounting.

2. Information Management: It is identified as a critical aspect of management accounting research. Future research could explore the use of information systems in decision-making, the role of information management in promoting organisational efficiency, and the impact of information management on organisational performance.

3. Big Data and Management Accounting: Cluster analysis suggests that big data is an emerging area of research in management accounting. Future research could focus on the potential of big data in predicting financial performance, the use of big data in cost accounting and management control, and the impact of big data on decision-making.

4. Management Accounting and Finance: Cluster analysis indicates that finance is crucial to management accounting research. Future research could focus on exploring the role of management accounting in financial analysis and forecasting, the impact of financial performance on decision-making, and the integration of financial and non-financial performance measures in management accounting.

5. Decision-Making in Management Accounting: Decision-making is essential in management accounting research. Future research could focus on exploring the factors that influence decision-making in management accounting, the role of decision-making frameworks in management control, and the impact of decision-making biases on organisational performance.

Overall, the identified clusters suggest that management accounting research is diverse and covers various topics. Future research could explore the interactions among these domains and their impact on organisational performance.

The clusters identified in the VOSviewer map file indicated no direct relationship between management accounting and marketing, specifically distribution. The clusters primarily focus on different aspects of management accounting research, including environmental management, information management, decision-making, big data, finance, and economics.

However, management accounting is essential for businesses to manage their costs, profits, and financial performance, which can impact marketing and distribution. For instance, effective cost management through management accounting can help businesses offer competitive product prices, improving marketing and distribution effectiveness.

Similarly, management accounting systems can provide businesses real-time sales and inventory data, enabling informed decisions concerning distribution channels and supply chain management. Businesses can use this data to optimise their distribution strategies to improve their overall marketing efforts and reach their target markets more effectively.

Therefore, despite no direct relationship between the identified clusters and marketing, management accounting is critical in managing business costs, financial performance, and supply chain management, which can significantly impact marketing and distribution.

4.8. Co-Authorship Network Visualisation Map

The visualisation map depicts the collaboration between researchers from various countries (Figure 4). It shows clusters of researchers working together in different regions. The stronger and more significant the connection between the two countries, the closer they are in the visualisation map. Higher collaboration frequency corresponds to larger nodes.

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4: Network visualisation map of the most frequent co-authorships.

Based on the total link strength, Germany most frequently co-authors management accounting-related research with researchers from Sweden, Italy, and the Netherlands. There were papers where German researchers collaborated with Asian researchers. It is worth noting, however, that researchers from Asian countries tend to collaborate with researchers from the same region. Malaysian researchers, for example, frequently collaborate with researchers from Indonesia and Australia.

South Korean researchers, on the other hand, frequently collaborate with US researchers. These findings provide insights into future research collaborations; for example, Malaysian researchers may consider co-authoring with their counterparts from Japan, Thailand, Korea, and Europe.

4.9. Geographical Distribution of Publications

The analysis continues with the nations that have contributed most to management accounting research. The retrieved documents were published with the assistance of researchers from 86 nations. A country relates to an institution that publishes a paper rather than considering the authors' nationality. The top 15 countries contributing to management accounting publications are listed in Table 8 and Figure 5. With 136 documents, Germany ranks the highest, followed by the United Kingdom (119 documents) and the United States (112 documents). China (105 documents) and Russia (103 documents) are ranked fourth and fifth, respectively. Several developing nations, including Indonesia (99 documents) and Malaysia (81 documents), are among the top 10 countries actively contributing to management accounting research. The purpose of examining this information is to determine the number of publications in the most influential journals, which indicates a nation's standing in the field.

Table 8: The 15 Countries with the Highest Number of Publications.

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_t0007.png 이미지

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5: Network visualisation map of citations by countries.

4.10. Potential Future Research Areas

This research also demonstrates the co-occurrence of words. A term is a word or expression with a specific meaning in certain contexts. Figure 6 depicts the terms used in article titles, abstracts, and citations.

OTGHB7_2023_v21n11_1_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 6: Network visualisation of co-occurring term in titles and abstracts.

Figure 6 shows various nodes, each representing a term. There are different sizes and colours. The size of a node determines the importance of a term used in articles; a larger size indicates that the term is used frequently. Blue colours represent older and dominant studies. There are two significant term clusters. The first cluster is the term "accounting," which appears in the majority of studies, followed by "performance" as the second cluster. Financial terms such as "cost," "profit," and "budget" are related to studies in the "Accounting" cluster. Our research on management accounting articles can also be considered part of the "accounting" cluster. The green colour represents recent and less significant studies. We see terms like "enterprise," "technology," and "environmental management accounting."

Yellow nodes represent current or trending terms that researchers are currently investigating. These yellow nodes can also be used to suggest directions for future research. The terms in this category allude to more profound technological concepts, such as "artificial intelligence," "algorithm," "big data," and "digital technology," all of which appear related to the accounting cluster. These terms are used in articles by Jasim and Raewf (2020), Qasim and Kharbat (2020), and Lohapan (2021). One of the research lines in the "performance" cluster is "management accounting system," depicted by a yellow node. It demonstrates that some articles, such as those by Kesumawati, Putri and Dwirandra (2019) and Fuadah et al. (2020), are about management accounting systems and their relationship with managerial performance. The terms "technology", "digital technology", and "agriculture enterprise” are also connected. It suggests potential future research contexts, such as studies by Farooq et al. (2020) and Groher et al. (2020), which used agriculture enterprises as their research context.

5. Conclusion

Management accounting practices significantly contribute to business operations and processes, improving organisational performance. Most previous studies focused on traditional management accounting and control methods. However, organisations have recognised the importance of adopting strategic management accounting practices and effectively managing costs considering rapid changes in the business environment, intense business competition, survival, and diverse business contexts. Management accounting practices enable decision-makers to make informed decisions on distribution channels and supply chain management. Therefore, despite a direct relationship between the identified clusters and product/service distributions, management accounting is critical for managing business costs, financial performance, and supply chain management, which can significantly impact product and service distributions.

Consequently, increasing research trends in management accounting have drawn the researchers' attention to the present study topic. Management accounting manuscripts have been published in a variety of journals with varying contexts and contributions. The Scopus database gathered all relevant literature on management accounting, yielding 1,554 documents based on keyword search results.

This study used bibliometric analysis to map and structure management accounting literature. Management accounting research's ongoing relevance must not be denied. It is reflected in the increase in the articles published in the last two years despite ongoing research for over four decades. It highlights researchers' interest and the growing importance of the research area.

Management accounting studies dominated research in business, management, and accounting. According to several published articles, the top journals in this field are the Journal of Accounting and Organisational Change. Given the current trend in environmental research, management accounting research has also been published in the Journal of Cleaner Production with a cite score of 15.8. Schaltegger is the most active author with 15 management accounting publications; however, Otley’s management accounting article has been cited most frequently.

Regarding country co-authorship relationships, the findings show that Germany is the leading contributor, followed by the United Kingdom and the United States of America. While author collaboration across borders is common in many developed countries, two ASEAN countries, Malaysia and Indonesia, collaborate with other European countries, such as Canada and Australia. The disparity in research patterns between developed and developing countries could be attributed to differences in resource availability. Nonetheless, the emerging research patterns in developing countries should be recognised. It is also worth noting that many international collaborations occur within the same cultural cluster (Gupta Hanges & Dorfman, 2002). According to Hofstede (1994), avoiding cultural bias requires a single dominant researcher's culture. Another point worth mentioning in this study is China, where the total number of management accounting publications is enormous. Future research can be suggested based on the findings of the bibliometric analysis. New studies in management accounting may incorporate technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, and digital technology in tandem with current technological development. Surprisingly, a new research context was discovered: agricultural enterprise accounting practices.

The findings and conclusions of bibliometric analysis can be helpful in various ways. Through bibliometric data, the findings provide an insightful overview of management accounting research. Hence, some key indicators, such as the number of papers, citations, and the h-index, are highlighted. Furthermore, the findings can be used to identify potential future research projects: research concepts, contexts, and global collaborative research.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. There are inherent database concerns considering that the study uses only the Scopus database. As a result, despite Scopus being one of the largest databases, it is important to note several journals remain unindexed; hence, publications in such journals might not have been reported. Furthermore, based on the paper title, this analysis was limited to management accounting.

As a result, other articles about accounting methods in management that did not include the term explicitly were ignored. A perfect search query is unlikely, leading to positive and negative results. Future research could broaden the search query to include other available databases, such as Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Dimensions. In the long run, integrating these databases will result in more intriguing and valuable outcomes (Nain et al., 2022).

References

  1. Ahmed Mohamed Ghandour, D. (2021). Analytical review of the current and future directions of management accounting and control systems. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 9(3), 43-73. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3819654
  2. Anthony A. Atkinson, Kaplan, R. S., & Matsumura, E. M. (2012). Management accounting: Information for decision making and strategy execution. Pearson Education.
  3. Baiman, S. (1990). Agency research in managerial accounting: A second look. Accounting Organizations and Society, 15(4), 341-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90023-N
  4. Cokins, G. (2009). Performance management: Integrating strategy execution, methodologies, risk, and analytics. John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W. & Samuel, S. (1996). Managerial accounting research: The contributions of organizational and sociological theories. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 8, 1-35.
  6. Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2018). Horngren's cost accounting: a managerial emphasis. Pearson.
  7. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021a). Research constituents, intellectual structure, and collaboration patterns in Journal of International Marketing: An analytical retrospective. Journal of International Marketing, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X211004234
  8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pattnaik, D., & Lim, W. M. (2021b). A bibliometric retrospection of marketing from the lens of psychology: Insights from psychology & marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 38(5), 834-865. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21472
  9. Farooq, M. S., Riaz, S., Abid, A., Umer, T., & Zikria, Y. B. (2020). Role of IoT technology in agriculture: A systematic literature review. Electronics, 9(2), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9020319
  10. Fuadah, L. L., Safitri, R. H., Yuliani, Y., & Arisman, A. (2020). Determinant factors' impact on managerial performance through management accounting systems in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO10.109
  11. Groher, T., Heitkamper, K., & Umstatter, C. (2020). Digital technology adoption in livestock production with a special focus on ruminant farming. Animal, 14(11), 2404-2413. doi:10.1017/S1751731120001391
  12. Grueso-Gala, M., & Zornoza, C. C. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the literature on no-financial accounting information reporting: Review of the research and network visualization. Management Letters, 22(1), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211545mg
  13. Gupta, V., Hanges, P. J., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Cultural clusters: Methodology and findings. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00070-0
  14. Hilton, R. W., Maher, M. W., & Selto, F. H. (2006). Cost management: Strategies for business decisions. McGraw-Hill.
  15. Hofstede, G. (1994). Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40(1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.1.4
  16. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (1998). Management Accounting Concepts: International Management Accounting Practice Statement (Rev. Ed.). New York.
  17. Jasim, Y. A., & Raewf, M. B. (2020). Information technology's impact on the accounting system. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.24086/cuejhss.v4n1y2020.pp50-57
  18. Johnson, T. H., & Kaplan R. S. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  19. Kaplan, R. S. (1993). Research opportunities in management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 5(Fall), 1-14.
  20. Kesumawati, N., Putri, I. & Dwirandra, A. (2019). The role of business strategies, environmental uncertainty and decentralization as moderating the effect of management accounting systems on managerial performance. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(3), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.21744/IRJMIS.V6N3.627
  21. Kim, M. K., Park, M. C., & Jeong, D. H. (2004). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications policy, 28(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2003.12.003
  22. Langfield-Smith, K., Smith, D., Andon, P., Hilton, R., & Thorne, H. (2019). Management Accounting. (8th ed.). Australia: McGraw-Hill Australia.
  23. Lohapan, N. (2021). Digital accounting implementation and audit performance: An Empirical research of tax auditors in Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(11), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO11.0121
  24. Macintosh, N. B., & Scapens, R. W. (1990). Structuration theory in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(5), 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90028-S
  25. Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package-Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management accounting research, 19(4), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
  26. Merigo, J. M. & Yang, J-B. (2017). Accounting research: A bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12109
  27. Nain, S., Lajuni, N., & Mail, R. (2022). Management accounting practices: A bibliometric analysis. Management & Accounting Review, 21(1), 1-22.
  28. Renaud, A., & Maucuer, R. (2018). 20 years of academic publishing in management: A bibliometric analysis. Management, 21(4), 1186-1212.
  29. Qasim, A., & Kharbat F. F. (2020). Blockchain technology, business data analytics, and artificial intelligence: Use in the accounting profession and ideas for inclusion into the accounting curriculum. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 17(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta52649
  30. Shields, M. D. (2018). A Perspective on management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-10618
  31. Shank, J. K., Shank, J. H., Govindarajan, V., & Govindarajan, S. (1993). Strategic cost management: the new tool for competitive advantage. Simon and Schuster.
  32. Verma, S., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118(Sept.), 253-261.
  33. Ye, Q., Song, H., & Li, T. (2012). Cross-institutional collaboration networks in tourism and hospitality research. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2-3(April - July), 55-64.
  34. Young, S. M., & Selto, F. H. (1991). New manufacturing practices and cost management: a review of the literature and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 10, 265-298.
  35. Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629